Is It Important to Question the Ideas and Decisions of People in Position of Authority?
Essay Preview: Is It Important to Question the Ideas and Decisions of People in Position of Authority?
Report this essay
Assignment: Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in position of authority?
Inquiry, especially to authorities, with its very nature, has always directed human beings to innovation, revolution and even metamorphosis. Admittedly, questioning the authority, to some extent, is regarded as defiance and may trigger such unfortunate outcomes as forfeiting properties or rights, undergoing physical torture and even dying. However, in sacrifice of personal advantages, these peoples queries do have positive impacts, from correcting the seemingly “right” opinions to promoting the progress of humans evolution. Accordingly, I consider questioning authority as necessary and indispensable.
History, as the impeccable testimony of truth, repeatedly confirms the importance of questioning authority. Generally recognized as a multifaceted figure, Oliver Cromwell, a military and political leader, testified, at very least, the correctness of this behavior. Its by no means exaggeration that inquiry to authority existed throughout his success. As a puritan, Cromwell explicitly scorned royalists protection of Catholic and required benefits for Puritan in the second Parliament, immediately before it was dismissed. Through this Parliament, Cromwell owned his position to the patronage of others, which might explain why later he managed to recruit senators, eradicating Charles Is tyrannies. In 1642, when insurgence was bursted out in Scotland, obliging Charles I to reunion the Parliament, Cromwell proposed the reform of England among 18 committees and became the irreplaceable leader opponent of the England Royal. Soon after his proposal, in 1642 August, the English First Civil War began.
Though the Parliaments mainstream was to oppose Charles I, after several insignificant wars, occupied most by Presbyterian, it halted, trying to reconcile with Charles. Despite majoritys rejection, Cromwell did not compromise. Instead, triumphs in crucial wars, which are Marston Moor War, Battle of Naseby and Battle of Newbury alike, settled his imperative status in the Parliament, meanwhile contributing to his later position as Lord Protector.
Oliver Cromwells predilection of questioning authority resulted in not only the democracy of England, but also the prevalence of such social system internationally, including United States of America, Canada, France, Australia. Commensurate as a pioneer, who first supplant monarchism with bourgeois, Cromwell testified the power of democracy as well as the essentiality of questioning authority.
Well, provided that Cromwells experience didnt convince people as adequately as others did, there are more examples, ranging for philosophy to science, proving so. If everybody had been obeying ordinance from the Church, Europe would have never been an alias