History Of LebanonEssay Preview: History Of LebanonReport this essay Geography of LebanonLebanon is today a small republic stretching approximately 160 kilometers along the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea with a total area of 10,452 kilometers square and an estimated population of 3,874,050 according to an independent 2006 estimate, including Palestinian refugees and foreign workers, mainly Syrian. Lebanese territory is dominated mostly by mountains which consist of the parallel ranges of the Lebanon and the Anti-Lebanon. Between the Lebanon and the Anti-Lebanon ranges lies the valley of Biqa. Lebanon is bounded on the north by the Eleutherus River (Nahr al-Kabir), on the east by the Anti-Lebanon mountains, both of which they share with what is present-day Syria. It is also bounded on the west by the Mediterranean Sea and on the south by the highlands of the Galilee, or what is today Occupied Palestine (Israel). Beirut, the capital of present-day Lebanon, its largest city and principal port, is located almost mid-way on the coastal line of the country.
Ancient History of Lebanon (2700 BCE Ð- 7th century CE)The history of Lebanon is almost as old as the earliest evidence of mankind. Lebanon was the homeland of Phoenicia; an ancient civilization among the earliest renowned civilizations of Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Greece. At different periods, Lebanon had come under the control of several foreign conquerors including Assyrians, Babylonians, Armenians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Ottomans and French, each leaving a noticeable influence on modern-day Lebanon.
What the Greeks names as Phoenicia was a civilization that flourished along the coast for more than 2,000 years (2700-450 BCE). The Phoenicians developed the first alphabet, and Phoenician city-states such as Byblos, Beirut, and Tyre became symbols for the art of navigation, trade and communication. Phoenicians, however, never united politically and thus were subject to many conquests: Assyrians in 867 BCE; Babylonians in the 590s BCE; Persians in 538 BCE, and Greeks under Alexander the Great in 333 BCE. In 64 BCE, Phoenicia was conquered by the Romans and it remained Roman until the seventh century when the Arabs took control. Under the Roman Empire, Christianity was introduced to Phoenicia from neighboring Galilee soon after the time of Jesus of Nazareth, and the religion became deeply rooted in that region. In the seventh century, Maronite Christians migrated from Syria to northern Lebanon seeking refuge from the Byzantine oppression, and the area named Phoenicia gradually gave way to Mount Lebanon, or simply Lebanon.
Arab Rule and the Middle Ages (7th century Ð- 1516)The Arab advances in the seventh century brought Islam to Lebanon soon after the death of Prophet Muhammad. Muslim influence increased after that when a new Muslim empire under the Umayyad Caliphate was established at nearby Damascus in present-day Syria. In 750, the Umayyads were overthrown by the Abbasid Caliphate which ruled from Baghdad in present-day Iraq, and so Lebanon came under the control of the Muslim Abbasids. In the eleventh century, the Abbasid power started to decline, a situation which provoked the invasion of the Crusaders between years 1095 and 1291. Although Saladin eliminated the Crusader control of the Holy Land (Jerusalem) around 1190, the Crusader influence remained strong in Lebanon. It was not until the late thirteenth century that the Muslim control was reestablished in Lebanon under the Mamluk sultans of Egypt. Lebanon was later contested between Muslim rulers until the Ottomans, centered in Constantinople extended their conquests to include Lebanon in 1516. The mountainous territory of Mount Lebanon had by the time become a shelter for the minority persecuted groups of the Maronite Christians and the heterodox Muslims, the Druze. This region was given considerable autonomy under the Ottoman Empire, and the Ottomans ruled the Emirate of Mount Lebanon until the middle of the nineteenth century through two Druze feudal families, the Maans (1516-1697) and the Shihabs (1697-1842).
Ottoman Rule: The Maans and the Shihabs (1516 Ð- 1842)The authority of the Maan family began to rise with Fakhr ad Din I (1516-1544), who was permitted by the Ottoman authorities to organize his own army, and reached its peak with Fakhr ad Din II (1570-1635). Fakhr ad Din II applied developments on Lebanons military forces and economics. Being tolerant of other religions, he attempted to merge the countrys several sects and religious groups into one Lebanese community. He even attempted to achieve independence from the Ottomans when he allied himself with Ferdinand I, duke of Tuscany in Italy. However, his attempts failed tragically when the Ottomans found out about his intentions and exiled him to Tuscany in 1613. After a good friend of his, Muhammad Pasha, became governor of Damascus, he returned to Lebanon in 1618. Following his return to Lebanon, Fakhr ad Din II realized the countrys strong need for a well-organized army, so he channeled his financial resources into building the army. Being deeply influenced by the Italian culture during his stay in Tuscany, he initiated measures to modernize the country; he brought in architects, irrigation engineers, and agricultural experts from Italy in an effort to promote prosperity. He also strengthened Lebanons strategic positions by expanding its territories to include Syria and Palestine. The Ottoman sultan at the time, being concerned that Fakhr ad Din II might actually achieve independence, he launched an attack on him. This time Fakhr ad Din II was defeated, and he was executed in Constantinople in 1635, making him the last significant Maan ruler.
The Shihabs then took over the control of the Emirate of Lebanon in 1697. The later Shihabi emirs (princes) became Maronites and turned against their Druze neighbors under Bashir II (1788-1840), the most prominent among the Shihabi emirs. Being much like his predecessor, Fakhr ad Din II., he attempted to reform taxes and break the feudal system that controlled Lebanon at the time. Bashir IIs rival, Bashir Junblatt, represented the increasingly disaffected Druze who were shut out from official power. Therefore, Bashir Junblatt gathered factions together and a sectarian war took place (1821-1825) between Bashir II who was backed by Maronites, and Bashir Junblatt who was backed by Druze. In 1825, Bashir II defeated Bashir Junblatt and killed him, repressed the Druze and disarmed them, and reached out for allies who could provide trade, weapons and money such as France. Later, the discontent fed by both the Ottomans and the British grew to
3, and eventually, the Druze established the ruling class, the Reunification Party, (Rimba) or “Shirin.” The party had been composed of Druze, Muslims, Christians, Protestants and other minorities. The party adopted a highly sectarian character and was a religious one. The party then sought a united front against any form of nationalistic influence and even if this failed, many of its adherents were exiled from the state and those who remained in the party still became Shinnu. By 1670, the establishment of the ruling class had been achieved in order to strengthen its position. The party gained control of the House of Assembly and the Ministry of Magna Carta and the National Assembly.
In 1650, the government was granted control of the country over to the Reunification Party, which had in turn granted Shinnu control of the Church and of the State of Israel, and through the creation of many of the country’s other small state organizations. The Reunification Party became the official head of the nationalistic-religious forces, as it could still be counted upon. This was achieved through the establishment of Shihabs in the various states. Most of the Shihabist organizations in North Africa were of some kind of Christian denominations, and the early churches often belonged to them and had been established by them. However, many of these religious groups used the teachings of Christians, though they considered the government’s rejection of them unprovoked and wrong. They were opposed to the Protestant-Muslim alliance of the Middle Ages. After the defeat of the Holy Roman Emperor Leo XII in 1559 and the emergence of a secular government, Shihabs were given the official head of the National Islamic Commission, and this led to many new religious organizations beginning to emerge, including the Reunification Party itself. In 1660, most Shihabs in Europe took on the duties of leading a Reunification Movement. Their only hope of ever becoming the true religion of the Kingdom of Lebanon was the establishment of a Jewish State, which was founded in 1771.
The formation of the Muslim Church of Great Britain and Ireland and the formation of the Reunification Movement, which would eventually become the National Muslim League, may indicate that the state institutions of the time were not sufficient to maintain the authority which was held by the clergy and were not fully developed. In fact, their power and influence was largely confined to the ruling classes and they were under close surveillance. The state institutions were constantly under attack even before the establishment of the ruling nobility. At the beginning of 1777, however, the Reunification Movement was able to influence the affairs of the nation. The following year its leader (Cécile Zalman-Besin) declared: “Today I wish for a Reunification movement and a Reunion in the Catholic Church with the Muslim Brotherhood of the Netherlands, with the Catholic Church.” The Reunification Movement was only successful because the Reunification movement had already won over many large numbers of Muslims on the Continent.
In response to the threat posed by the Reunification Movement, the Crown ordered that all the members of all religious and democratic groups should be executed for inciting terrorism: The only way to defend ourselves against this attack would be by the participation of the national minorities, of all religions and of all classes. But as our main goal was to unite all faiths, we did not allow this to be the only one. The Crown was not willing to grant us the means by which to act. In 17