Essay About Particular Attention And Currency Problems

Marina Case
Essay Preview: Marina Case
Report this essay
In his review of the years trading the company chairman, Sir Richard
Greenbury, recognized 1999as a major reversal to company fortunes drawing
particular attention to flat sales in the peak trading Christmas period, the need
for heavy price reductions to shift large quantities of fashion merchandise, a
cyclical downturn in housewares, overseas economic turmoil (e.g. riots in
Indonesia and currency problems in Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia),
adverse trading conditions in the Far East, together with the strength of the ₤
sterling and difficulties in the supply chain sourcing from relatively high-cost UK-
based manufacturers.
When asking the almost polemical question what went wrong? the company
chief executive, Peter Salsbury, went on to say the answer is simplewe have
not kept pace with tremendous changes taking place in the retail market.
Anecdotal evidence
To some extent the fall in the share price, dramatic though it was, was not as
great as it might have been as the anticipated bad news had already been built
into the share price as the stock market listened to press, analyst and trade
comment suggesting all was not well. A broad spectrum of comments had been
aired suggesting that M&S was not only increasingly becoming out of touch with
its retail market but also, and more importantly, losing touch with both its more
general macro-and micro-environment.
In no particular order the kinds of comment that were being voiced as possible
explanations for M&Ss demise included the following:
The merchandise, especially ladies outerwear (e.g. trousers, skirts, suits,
jackets and knitwear) was not of modern design and cut. Indeed, the offering
was of staid fashion with little category breadth or depth. The colours too, it
was often said, were dreary an monotonous.
The attempt to satisfy in one store a broad array of age groups from say
teenage daughter via mother and aunt to grandmother was proving difficult.
Resistance, especially by the younger age group, to shop in a store selling
M&S labelled merchandise. Clearly for such a group there were brand
perception problems with ego-intensive fashion clothing items.
A lack of flair, cut, style and colour for the older female age group.
Famously, one 50-something female shareholder berated the board at the
1999 AGM. She explained she had visited a major M&S store to buy a
series of items for her wardrobe prior to going on a summer holiday. Failing
to find anything at M&S she had bought all her requirements from
competitive outlets. She challenged the mainly male board to understand the
physiological and psychological needs of the older woman!
Problems of being out of stock of the more popular selling clothing items.
The non-performance of the home delivery/shopping service even
sometimes involving wedding lists. Customers were told items were out of
stock, no longer available (although still listed in the home shopping
catalogue) and the china patterns had been withdrawn meaning it was not
possible to replace breakages.
A refusal to accept credit cards. The company would only accept three forms
of payments – cash/direct debit; cheque or the M&S Chargecard.
Increasingly the company was offering poor value of money – full prices
being combined with deteriorating quality, i.e. wear, wash and care. This
comment was often made of lingerie, a product class in which M&S was
once pre-eminent.
High prices of food especially the convenience value-added items.
Political and planning constraints on out-of-town shopping developments
and the encouragement of the use of brown-as compared to green-field
sites. Brown-filed sites though often have significant preparation costs
(clearance and possibly pollution) and more importantly are rarely in
preferred