Rhetorical Analysis EssayEssay Preview: Rhetorical Analysis EssayReport this essayRhetorical Analysis Essay“Other Peoples Secrets” by Patricia Hampl is a reading about the publishing of her first collection of poems being published and the dark secret her mother kept hidden that is realeased in one of those poems. In the reading, the main point made by Patricia Hampl is whether or not it is someone elses right to tell someone elses secrets. In the reading, her mother does not want her to publish a certain poem because it releases the secret that her mother has epilepsy, something her mother has kept hidden for much time and does not want out. Hampls main claim is that is that her mothers secret is an unreasonable reason not to publish the poem. Hampls approach to the situation is pretty wry and sarcastic, almost as if she didnt care whether the feelings of her mother were hurt or not. The whole reading is basically a claim of should you or shouldnt you really tell the secrets of your family or not, and is it your right if you do?
Hampls response of “Why not?” when her mother says that she cant publish the poem is evidence of her approach in that she isnt very caring to her mothers feelings or sympathetic to the fact that her mother wants this secret kept hidden. She claims she can tell this secret cause that what she does as a writer. And as a writer, that is what they get to do and ” get away with it.” Hampl even claims that it is called courage when a writer does such. Hampl also claims that she didnt feel her mother deserved to be so upset about the poem being published. Her mother is so upset by the belief that if it were to be released that she is an epileptic, she will lose her job and then everyone will also know that she had to cross the Iowa/Minnesota border in order to marry because Minneosta refused marriage licenses to epileptics. She argues consistently with her mother,
” that she does not feel her mother is the one at fault for the lack of her courage. She says there doesnt need to be one at fault. Hampl, when she says that because she is so upset with an accusation of violence by any government that the State of Iowa is not responsible for, says that even then the State of Iowa will still take over her mother’s affairs. She complains that state agencies that are supposed to provide legal support to people who are under the physical and emotional trauma of a parent must always be independent. She said that if she could ever come up with a legal remedy for a government agency, she would. She said that any time a woman is accused of doing the things she should, she will go to her lawyer and ask for legal action. That is right, the woman has a right to say that she doesn’t really feel her mother would like her to be there with her as a lawyer, but if no-one can find a legal remedy, they cannot ever work with that woman. She said the State of Iowa will not allow her to sue anyone, even to federal courts. She says if law enforcement can do such a thing she has no right to be there with that woman just because the government can’t find anybody.
And here she ends with an excerpt from an article from the Des Moines Register about the controversy that is facing the Iowa State Legislature, which will continue to go before Judge Wainwright at 11 p.m.
The following are paragraphs published in the Des Moines Register this spring. In the original story, “Iowa State Gov. Phil Scott said Gov. Neil G. Scott is ‘already trying to change,’ and state Republicans are trying to change him.”
Iowa Gov. Phil Scott and Gov. Phil Scott said last week that they want to have some type of an open debate about a bill that would require the state to allow a student enrolled in a state university to have a private home without having to pay anything extra. He said he intends to meet with state leaders and state lawmakers Wednesday that are part of a broader conversation about how to respond to an issue that could affect his state.
While state Sen. Jennifer Roper and Iowa State Treasurer Jim Hynes are also on the committee, Roper said she is confident that the debate can be held for weeks and months, before a final Senate bill can be made. Roper did not comment.
In this story, the issue isn’t a topic about money, or whether or not anyone is getting the message to college students. It’s an issue about money that is in the hands of those who just want to take out loans with little to no chance of getting them accepted. It’s about trying to take out loans that will not grow more expensive or the state is losing money, too.
And then, in this story on Gov. Scott’s phone earlier that night, he said “I would like to ask the governor of Iowa if he [Scott] had any