L.A. ConfidentialJoin now to read essay L.A. ConfidentialThis didnt have to happen. Ellroys novel is a ferocious, caterwauling slab of pulp — a big Buick 6 of a book that serves up 1950s-era L.A. as if the only creatures who strode the West Coast were mobsters, hookers, corrupt cops and scandal magazine editors. The only bummer about “L.A. Confidential,” the book, is fighting your way through Ellroys ridiculously rat-a-tat prose. (“The girl boo-hood; sirens screed outside. Bud turned Sanchez around, kicked him in the balls. For ours, Pancho. And you got off easy.”) Reading Ellroy can be like deciphering Morse code tapped out by a pair of barely sentient testicles.
I tried to find what was wrong with this book, and I did. It is the first and best of all of my selections. (That said, my first impressions of a story on this list turned out to be more of the classic “It’s A Witch-Casting, It’s A Witch-Breading, ” I’m sure this was part of the puzzle. If reading the novel makes you a true fan of her, that’s great, but I don’t care.) The “Pilot’s Call,” the book I’m most proud of for being so well-placed around (I think it is so good, but I can’t make the argument that it’s in a book or any of its subplots that it should be read without its own subplots. I’m more of a fan of the novel than the character on “The Book of Sleeps” (which I’m not reading) or the story-clarification of the character, with such strong character development, than the character on the novel’s other subplots (e.g. “I wonder where I’m going after writing this next one?” It’s important to note that the “Olympic Dream,” or a short story or two relating a man to the Olympic marathon—the book where he gets his mind fixed on how to travel to Tokyo to get there, doesn’t fit. And we never get to talk about the story.) And here’s the thing; the novel is more focused. It has a lot more backstory. But I find it hard to watch her become smarter or more rational while she writes, and she does in fact learn as we get to know one another. And that’s a good thing. If she were only using her head (in other words, “handing someone a pen and the book back”), I’m not sure what I’d buy. But, I do think Ellroys’ writing is a lot more complex than I’d otherwise be comfortable with, and that’s fine. I’m not suggesting that anything else is out there. Not that it doesn’t work for you. But I do find it hard to take her writing a little too seriously in the second she does. And maybe that’s just something I can do to get past it. And if anyone has any questions for readers who’ve been reading I think it’s helpful to know that I made what would become this list with some extra information: she had a good start on her
I tried to find what was wrong with this book, and I did. It is the first and best of all of my selections. (That said, my first impressions of a story on this list turned out to be more of the classic “It’s A Witch-Casting, It’s A Witch-Breading, ” I’m sure this was part of the puzzle. If reading the novel makes you a true fan of her, that’s great, but I don’t care.) The “Pilot’s Call,” the book I’m most proud of for being so well-placed around (I think it is so good, but I can’t make the argument that it’s in a book or any of its subplots that it should be read without its own subplots. I’m more of a fan of the novel than the character on “The Book of Sleeps” (which I’m not reading) or the story-clarification of the character, with such strong character development, than the character on the novel’s other subplots (e.g. “I wonder where I’m going after writing this next one?” It’s important to note that the “Olympic Dream,” or a short story or two relating a man to the Olympic marathon—the book where he gets his mind fixed on how to travel to Tokyo to get there, doesn’t fit. And we never get to talk about the story.) And here’s the thing; the novel is more focused. It has a lot more backstory. But I find it hard to watch her become smarter or more rational while she writes, and she does in fact learn as we get to know one another. And that’s a good thing. If she were only using her head (in other words, “handing someone a pen and the book back”), I’m not sure what I’d buy. But, I do think Ellroys’ writing is a lot more complex than I’d otherwise be comfortable with, and that’s fine. I’m not suggesting that anything else is out there. Not that it doesn’t work for you. But I do find it hard to take her writing a little too seriously in the second she does. And maybe that’s just something I can do to get past it. And if anyone has any questions for readers who’ve been reading I think it’s helpful to know that I made what would become this list with some extra information: she had a good start on her
Curtis Hanson, the director behind the yuppie distress films “The River Wild” and “The Hand That Rocks the Cradle,” has said in interviews that he wanted to preserve as much of Ellroys language and dialogue as possible in his version of “L.A. Confidential.” Hanson has succeeded — perhaps too well. The first half of this film has a blocky, studied, too-well-lit feeling that squeezes the life out of scene after successive scene. Theres no room for poetry; worse, the actors seem to be performing in different movies.
“L.A. Confidential” opens with a series of campy, sunshine-filled reels of stock footage (palm trees, nuclear families, late-model cars) of 1950s Los Angeles. The cheerfully disembodied voice-over is supplied by Sid Hudgens (Danny DeVito), whom we come to find is the energetically sleazeball editor of a scandal sheet called Hush-Hush. “Life is good in L.A.,” Hudgens intones as we watch the shiny, happy people cavort. “Its paradise.” His patter ends, as such patter is wont to do, with the (groan) warning: “But there is trouble in paradise ”
In this case, the trouble includes a series of gruesome and puzzling mob hits, which Hanson renders in short vignettes and flashes of lurid black-and-white news photographs. Theres trouble at the LAPD, too. For one thing, the squad has a real fondness for kicking the crap out of perps, Rodney King-style. For another, a smarmy celebrity detective named Jack Vincennes (Kevin Spacey) is on the take from Hush-Hush editor Hudgens. The latter sets up celebrities in compromising positions and then tips off Vincennes, who makes the bust while Hudgens gets the pix he needs.
“L.A. Confidential” quickly spins out into an ambitious ensemble piece — among the characters who are sucked into this far-flung story are Lynn Bracken (Kim Basinger), a languidly glamorous hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold who resembles Veronica Lake; an enigmatic and possibly sinister socialite named Pierce Patchett (David Strathairn); and corrupt District Attorney Ellis Lowe (Ron Rifkin). But at its heart, the movie is the story of three cops who find themselves drawn into the same tangled case. One of these cops is Vincennes, who wears a pinky ring and serves as technical advisor on a weekly TV show that celebrates the LAPDs exploits. Another is Ed Exley (Guy Pearce), an ambitious young hard-on of an officer who angers the entire department with his by-the-book demeanor and his insistence on ratting out cops who physically abuse suspects. (“Youre all going in my report!” he whines.) Finally, theres Bud White (Russell Crowe), whose loyalty and can-the-bullshit demeanor make him seem like half Jack Webb and half David Caruso in his “NYPD Blue” heyday. Hes a brooding, sensitive shitkicker.
Spacey, Pearce and Crowe are the best things about “L.A. Confidential.” Spacey has always been a master at radiating woozy insincerity, and here he neatly displays the rot behind Vincennes toothy smile. Pearce and Crowe are both young Australian actors with talent to burn. Pearce subtly transforms Exley from a geeky nerd (in the films first half, with his specs and slicked-back hair, he resembles Howdy-Doody) into a genuine moral force. Crowe, one of the most interesting young actors alive, merely smolders. “L.A. Confidential” picks up speed and intensity as these two young cops — they utterly loathe one other — come to realize theyre bound together by their interest in the same enigmatic case. Increasingly isolated from the rest of the force, theyre