Effects of DownloadingEssay Preview: Effects of DownloadingReport this essayThe amount of people using the Internet is virtually everyone. Many homes have personal computers that their children and families use to serf the Internet, check e-mail, and chat with friends. Millions of Internet users nationwide take part in downloading content off of peer-to-peer programs such as Kazaa, Grokster, and WinMX. Peer-to-peer programs enable users all over the world to share files off of their computers, no matter what it is. All the person needs to do is put the desired file or folder into the піÐMy SharedпіЅ folder and millions of people can download it onto their computers free of charge, whether it is copyrighted or not. This act is highly favored by people since they can get practically anything they want for absolutely nothing. Many people download music, videos, programs, and images because they do not have to go out and buy the fifteen-dollar CD, twenty-dollar DVD, or three hundred dollar plus programs. Downloading can be examined in three areas: the amount downloaded, the amount of money involved, and the actual damage to the entertainment industry.
The amount of music that is being downloaded is slowly dropping because of the lawsuits that the industries have filed against hundreds of people relating to copyright infringement.
. . .Record labels have been blaming the fall of their profits on illegal distribution of music. Nearly 75 percent of college students have downloaded music from the Internet, 58 percent of them using Napster, according to a study by Greenfield Online, a Connecticut research firm, and YouthStream Media Networks. 6 billion in lost wages and more than $1. It is impossible to accurately estimate how many files are downloaded using peer-to-peer systems, but claiming that each download represents a loss is irrational. Many people download out of curiosity, to check out an artist, which often leads to a sale.
The other side of the story is that sharing music online does not kill CD sales. Although the record labels can legally demand around $150,000 per song, people well known with the cases have said most settlements have been for $2,500 to $7,500.
In conclusion, the topic of whether downloading hurts the industry or not is a very touchy and indefinite one. піЅOur issues are financial, not operational,піЅ E. Researchers at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina tracked music downloads over 17 weeks in 2002, matching data on file transfers with actual market performance of the songs and albums that were downloaded. The loss to the economy has significant impact, including more than 111,000 jobs lost, $5. 67% of all the music downloaded is actually saved and listened to illegally.
Since illegally downloading files has become more common, there has been much controversy about whether infringement of copyrighted music has either hurt or helped CD sales.
Some economic studies have found that file sharing has a negative impact on record sales. For example, three papers published in the April 2006 issue of the Journal of Law and Economics (Liebowitz, Rob and Waldfogel, Zentner) all found harm from filesharing. Alejandro Zentner notes in another paper published in 2005 (Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy), that music sales have globally dropped from approximately $38 billion in 1999 to $32 billion in 2003, and that this downward trend coincides with the advent of Napster in June of 1999. Finally, using aggregate data Stan J. Liebowitz argues in a series of papers (2005, 2006) that file sharing had a significant negative impact on record sales.
The Impact of Public Sharing of Public Goods
The government has largely tried to avoid imposing any policies that will impact the financial, political, or economic lives of working people. However, such policies, especially in relation to the share tax and its associated costs, have contributed drastically to the decline in the prices of all goods and services. In fact, the price of every copy of a newspaper increased from $14.00 to $35.00 by 1999, and there has been a noticeable decline in these prices over the next ten years. These trends might have contributed a substantial part of the decrease in the value of the average price for books and film for example. Such policies also have been associated with the decline in wages for non-federal employees, particularly in the United States, which have been a key source for the decline in the prices of every one of the five commodities for which there were no tax incentives.
The problem as regards the effective tax treatment of the public goods trade, which is the primary responsibility of all governments, is a political one. For most people, such policies are not necessary when they are imposed under the guise of “fiscal responsibility” (a government policy that does not involve any personal financial gain and which imposes substantial fiscal responsibility). All public goods (especially the physical goods, clothing, food, and personal care products), are, and still are, part of who we are. We are not required to make money using our own efforts.
The government is largely unaware of any evidence of a significant decline in the prices of all goods and services; however, the government has often tried to discourage their sale through advertising and with the help of some economic policy or lobbying efforts. The result has been to create incentives for people and businesses to buy and sell at different prices in order to attract public consumption and increase personal spending. Most such incentives are simply unnecessary or not at all likely in these circumstances. There are some incentives that do produce a significant and visible drop in consumption of private goods, such as the sale of certain fruit, vegetables, and seafood (both tangible and intangible purchases of both physical and intangible goods). In some cases, such incentives can be even more lucrative in some local governments than in others. It is the case that the government is willing to spend millions to promote such policies and that is why incentives for people and businesses to buy and sell private goods and services are often not even discussed among citizens; the government, however, has not discussed any such incentives. This is especially concerning since this is precisely the case when the benefits of such incentives, which provide the incentives to consume and use private goods at different prices, are being introduced alongside them by other
The Impact of Public Sharing of Public Goods
The government has largely tried to avoid imposing any policies that will impact the financial, political, or economic lives of working people. However, such policies, especially in relation to the share tax and its associated costs, have contributed drastically to the decline in the prices of all goods and services. In fact, the price of every copy of a newspaper increased from $14.00 to $35.00 by 1999, and there has been a noticeable decline in these prices over the next ten years. These trends might have contributed a substantial part of the decrease in the value of the average price for books and film for example. Such policies also have been associated with the decline in wages for non-federal employees, particularly in the United States, which have been a key source for the decline in the prices of every one of the five commodities for which there were no tax incentives.
The problem as regards the effective tax treatment of the public goods trade, which is the primary responsibility of all governments, is a political one. For most people, such policies are not necessary when they are imposed under the guise of “fiscal responsibility” (a government policy that does not involve any personal financial gain and which imposes substantial fiscal responsibility). All public goods (especially the physical goods, clothing, food, and personal care products), are, and still are, part of who we are. We are not required to make money using our own efforts.
The government is largely unaware of any evidence of a significant decline in the prices of all goods and services; however, the government has often tried to discourage their sale through advertising and with the help of some economic policy or lobbying efforts. The result has been to create incentives for people and businesses to buy and sell at different prices in order to attract public consumption and increase personal spending. Most such incentives are simply unnecessary or not at all likely in these circumstances. There are some incentives that do produce a significant and visible drop in consumption of private goods, such as the sale of certain fruit, vegetables, and seafood (both tangible and intangible purchases of both physical and intangible goods). In some cases, such incentives can be even more lucrative in some local governments than in others. It is the case that the government is willing to spend millions to promote such policies and that is why incentives for people and businesses to buy and sell private goods and services are often not even discussed among citizens; the government, however, has not discussed any such incentives. This is especially concerning since this is precisely the case when the benefits of such incentives, which provide the incentives to consume and use private goods at different prices, are being introduced alongside them by other
However, the most widely cited paper concludes that file sharing has no negative effect on CD sales. This paper by Olberholzer-Gee and Strumpf,[1] was published in the February 2007 issue of the Journal of Political Economy, and is the only paper which analyzes actual downloads on file sharing networks. As staff writer John Borland of CNET News.com reports, “even high levels of file-swapping seemed to translate into an effect on album sales