Performance Management
Essay title: Performance Management
Introduction
University of Phoenix Online is an institution of people. Human resources drive the processes that achieve the teaching, research, and outreach mission of the university. The university depends upon skilled, motivated, and informed employees to achieve the common goal of becoming the best online university. The university has adopted a Strategic Plan and one of its major strategies is to strengthen human resource management as well as professional development. For the university to be successful there must be a shared vision of excellence throughout the university.
The Provost, Vice President, Vice Provosts and Deans are responsible for knowing and approving the performance appraisals plans for their units; and are expected to review the plans in relations to the goals and objectives that have been set by the university. These senior officials are also responsible for ensuring that supervisors are appropriately trained to conduct performance appraisals.
The performance reviews of all supervisory personnel from senior administrators to first-line supervisors include a component focused on the quality, effectiveness, and results of the performance appraisal processes used by the supervisor in assessing the performance of those employees for whom he or she is directly responsible for.
In order to assist administrators carry out their performance appraisals responsibilities, Human Resource Services will provide the following support services:
Opportunities for training supervisors including written materials, video courseware, and on-campus workshops.
Periodic surveys in order to assess the overall effectiveness of performance appraisal processes and to identify opportunities for improvement.
To maintain records of performance evaluations, the University requires annual certification that a performance appraisal was conducted for each employee. The Human Resource Services office will notify the responsible provost, vice president, dean or major administrator of any employees within their operating units who do not have on file an acknowledgment that a performance appraisal was received twice a year.
Framework for Performance Appraisal
Because of the diversity of functional units and jobs within our department and university wide, the university has not adopted a standardized appraisal system. Operating departments are encouraged to develop an on-going process of evaluation and a performance evaluation is given every six months with a review instruments that best fits the department and management culture. The basic components of the performance appraisal process that the University includes goals, objectives and criteria.
It is important that employees have a clear understanding about what part of their performance is appraised and how it will be measured. Performance can be measured according to previously established and mutually understood goals between the employee and the supervisor. These goals should be challenging but attainable. Goals must be related to the core responsibilities defined on the employees Position Information Questionnaire (PIQ).
After the goals and objectives are established, criteria against which the employees job performance can be evaluated are agreed upon. Criteria are the indicators of successful performance on the job. Good performance goals, objectives, and criteria that the university looks for are:
job related
challenging, but achievable
clearly communicated and mutually understood
specific and objective
time-oriented
written
subject to revision, as needed
Communication
It is essential for the supervisor and employee to establish open, two-way communications relative to performance. With continuous communication, the performance review becomes a working tool for performance improvement, not just an exercise in listing good and bad performance. Both the manager and the employee benefit when performance is evaluated and discussed throughout the year. Employees receive the on-going support they need to perform their jobs well. Managers create the opportunity they need to influence their employees performance. Although the University requires two formal reviews each year, more frequent reviews and informal feedback allows the manager to accomplish more effective development with employees in a shorter period of time.
Informal Feedback
Informal