ApplichemEssay title: ApplichemTable of Content1. INTRODUCTION2. Performance Comparison of Release Plants3. Reasons for Better Performance of Some Plants4.Optimization Plan1. INTRODUCTIONApplichem manufactures specialty chemicals devised as solutions to specific customers problems. It was founded in Chicago just before World Was II.Release-ease is a specialty chemical that Applichem developed in 1952 for a customers request to help in formulating a plastic molding compound which released easily from metal molds after compression molding. It is in the form of dry powder. The difficulty involved in cleaning stainless steel molds for plastic parts along with un-molding forms the bottle neck for the plastic manufacturing process. Release-ease helps molded plastic parts to separate out easily from the molds and ensures that the mold remains clean.
Bibliography:
C. D. H. Miller, “Mushrooms: Chemical Process Analysis and Testing,” in The Microbiology of Microbes: Volume 3, Number 3, pp. 65-80 (eds J. S. Green and D. D. Hogg); 1999.
Original paper, by J. S. GreenInvented in 1946, [http://mushrooms.usgs.gov/~chrisgreen.htm>, but originally published in 1980<--Ed.><--Ed.>.<--Ed; 2010, p. 539>Original paper, by J. S. GreenInvented in 1946, [http://mushrooms.usgs.gov/~chrisgreen.htm], but originally published in 1980
Original paper, by J. S. GreenInvented in 1946, [http://mushrooms.usgs.gov/~chrisgreen.htm], but originally published in 1980<--Ed.><--Ed.><; 2008, p. 1218>Invented by J. S. GreenInvented in 1946, [http://mushrooms.usgs.gov/~chrisgreen.htm], but originally published in 1980
Release-ease was manufactured in four steps.⌐Reaction: Compression of raw materials under heat/pressure to form Release-ease. Slurry was formed. The size of particles (mentioned under suspendability) depended on the timing of introducing materials, federates etc.
⌐Cleaning: Isolation of Release-ease particles from the slurry. This was done through th e use of a conveyor belt.⌐Drying: Release-ease was dried⌐Packing: its powder then packedThe main problem faced relates to differences in operational efficiencies between the various locations producing Release-ease. Example at their Gary (Indiana) plant 1,300 people produce about 300 million tonnes a year, while their Frankfurt facility accounts for almost 90% of this value with only 600 employees.
Applichem has 6 plants spread across US, Europe and Asia. Their performance is discussed below:Gary PlantThe plant is situated in North America. Its very first manufactured product was Applichem. Most of the equipments installed for the process are more than 20 years old. It was designed to run a wide range of product formulation and package types and it is utilizing it quite well. It is running 8 formulations of Release-ease and about 80 package sizes.
Canadian PlantThe plant is located in Southern Ontario. It supplies only 4 products in addition to Release-ease, so in that sense it has not been using it capacity well. The plant has been regarded for its efficiency and the quality of its product. It has a “no frills” design and has been well maintained since its inception. It uses the packaging of only 50-kilo packets.
Frankfurt PlantIt supplies in Eurpe, Middle East and Africa and other Applichem plants. It has 2 processes for manufacturing Release-ease. The processes featured computer control of one process and extensive solid recovery and waste treatment. This plant bulk ships Release to other plants where the product is packaged and shipped to customers.
Mexican PlantIt is similar in design to the Gary plant and manufactures 6 product families in addition to Release-ease. All its Release-ease is packaged in 50-kilo bags. The education levels of the operators are significantly below those of operators in the other plants.
Venezuelan PlantIt has a no frills design and no improvements have been made between 1964 and 1982. The plant has old equipment and the only dryer is in poor repair. The education levels of the operators are significantly below those of operators in the other plants.
Sunchem, Japan ( joint venture)The process had been redesigned in 1969. Some automation and waste recovery has been introduced.Its volume was constrained by low dryer capacity. The Japanese plant processed many 1/2-kilo and 1-kilo packets.Within Applichem, the Japanese plant was thought to be technically excellent. Employees did more development work than other plants; they have a product test laboratory, a plastics engineering lab and a workers dormitory for single men. There was awareness for environmental protection.
2. Performance Comparison of Release PlantsAn evaluation of the factories is necessary for