Psy 250 – Personality Theory: Abraham MaslowEssay title: Psy 250 – Personality Theory: Abraham Maslowpsy 250Personality Theory: Abraham MaslowIn the discussion of the theory of personality, it would be ideal to have a brief introduction on what theory is all about. Initially, a theory is a reality model which helps to explain, predict, control and understand reality. In personality study, theories or models are commonly verbal. Ever since, anyone comes up with a graphic model along with symbolic illustrations, or a computer or mathematical model, but simply words can be the simplest forms of theories.
Generally, on the context of the personality of an individual, what is talked about is what makes a specific person different compared with other people, that person can be distinct or unique. Such personality aspect is referred to as individual differences. Stated in some theories, personality is considered as a central issue. All these theories are considerably given attention towards things such as traits, “tests and types which can then be classified or put into comparison with other people” (Engler, 1985). Some may be neurotic while others may not, some are extroverted while others can be introverted and the differences go on.
One of the founding fathers of humanistic psychology is Abraham Maslow on which he formulated an approach to behavioral behavior which had developed during the twentieth century in it’s in the middle part. This humanistic approach is often termed in psychology as the “third force,” for the reason that it developed following the establishment of the behaviorist and psychoanalytic and approaches.
Abraham Maslow was an academic who dedicated most of his entire professional teaching career, in his theories of behavior development and in conducting research. Even though he has written a significant piece on abnormal psychology and he rendered counseling in an “informal setup to a number of his students, he never had the thought of himself being a psychotherapist, contrasting various field of personality” (Engler, 1985). Abraham Maslow is more concentrated on healthy behavior and its holistic understanding rather than mental disorders treatment.
The theory of Abraham Maslow focuses on motivation and its role in personality. He was keenly engrossed in the explanation as to why people do the things which they do and what are the causes of their behavior. With the methods of theory and research from psychology, experimental, psychoanalysis, anthropology and other fields, His theory has integrated several of ideas into an all-inclusive rationalization of the forces which have people motivated. Even though he utilized the behavior of the animal in order to understand the basic forces of motivation, Abraham Maslow was principally involved in human behavior, and predominantly in the high-functioning and healthy people on their behavior.
He was also involved in the psychology of his own body – and in the process of how men, women and children have been raised (or developed) as their body parts (Maehl, 2001). He is one of the leading researchers of this time, who, together with many others, has worked to better understand and overcome our physical and psychological conditioning for success when we work outside of this body, because of its capacity to take care of our bodies with energy, nourish our tissues with energy-rich foods and the way humans need to live independently. His influence on the life of humans and in the development of the brain – that is what made him so special and influential – is evident in the fact that by studying his subjects directly, I felt the connection between those influences. In our own lab, he shows how the same force has led the brain through its evolution, a fact which can only be explained by the human mind, and what the brain has learned when we have been brought out of the dead body. He has been able to see in what way the evolution of the brain has been shaped by what he and others called “sensitivity” – whether that is the biological or human tendency in being sensitive.
As the term ‘sensitivity’ was coined by our late eminent psychologist, Frank D. Fudge (1982), we see ourselves as being the only ones sensitive to the external world, and how a lot of the scientific research into sensory phenomena and the human mind has involved that kind of research from this background as far back as 1955
In other words, if we talk about the natural development within human and animal bodies, we’re talking about an environment. This is all that we’ve ever known about the body, except perhaps for the fact that we humans have been told in this particular period (1955 for those who are now interested in biology) that the physical world is not that different from the natural. We have been the only ones exposed to the outside world, living without any body or the use of any food. For us, natural and human alike, natural environments are the natural environment in which we live, the world. It’s all we are, in other words. We’ve always been told that no matter what we eat, how we live, how we behave we are natural. The fact that animals don’t have the sense of smell and of sight has actually been a key factor in our understanding of how our bodies grow, develop and expand. For example, in the first part of their evolutionary history, humans went through a period in which they developed the sense that animals were no longer useful in life and had simply turned to natural things for the sole reason of reproduction in the wild. Humans were also told they were
A Brief History of Abraham Maslow and the History of Psychoanalysis
What happened to psychoanalysis until the 1960s?
When a sociologist began research into the origin of personality and behavior at the time it was founded in the late 1940s, it was a very controversial topic. In particular, I wasn’t very interested in the development of sociolinguistics as a discipline, but rather sociolinguistics as a field of investigation. That particular research, “Psychology’s ‘Origin,” was carried on by an English professor named John Schlossberg. Schlossberg, who had studied psychology, was a sociologist at Yale University and an expert on the origins of personality. He also believed that psychoses created some sort of “human nature” where the individual was somehow in control of his/her own impulses, causing him/her to act, or not act or have a natural propensity to act. He was, of course, also known as Freud, who was very popular in the 1940s, as he was known by an array of other popular and highly respected names in the field. Schlossberg’s original theories about the origins of personality were not as new as those of sociolinguistics, but there were some changes of thought in his methodology because it was published in the 1950s (he left Yale in 1955). One of the things he called Freud’s “Theories of the Human Soul,” was actually a form of psychotherapy for the soul itself. (These Freudian explanations of the human psyche were not new, however.) What Schlossberg and his followers did, however, was create a series of theories to test and describe the nature of psychology. These theories included the following:
The hypothesis of an innate tendency to ‘do something’ (i.e., feel pain) that is based on the natural tendency to respond in some manner to pain and pain-producing stimuli that are directly harmful and the like,
the theory of “the human psyche” as applied to the “bad” or undesirable behavior of certain people (i.e., people who are socially undesirable, psychopathic), or
these theories were then repeated in various versions to test and explain more precisely what the people are telling us is the truth of the phenomenon.
I’ve written a lot on these claims about psychology, but one of the things I’ve neglected to mention was that these theories were only applied to the human psyche in a way that led them to a large and diverse sample of people who were well known, well-respected people who were on track to be successful in life. This meant a lot of people did not necessarily know that people who appeared to be well-known and reputable had been trying to help them with various social problems before the fact. Indeed,
A Brief History of Abraham Maslow and the History of Psychoanalysis
What happened to psychoanalysis until the 1960s?
When a sociologist began research into the origin of personality and behavior at the time it was founded in the late 1940s, it was a very controversial topic. In particular, I wasn’t very interested in the development of sociolinguistics as a discipline, but rather sociolinguistics as a field of investigation. That particular research, “Psychology’s ‘Origin,” was carried on by an English professor named John Schlossberg. Schlossberg, who had studied psychology, was a sociologist at Yale University and an expert on the origins of personality. He also believed that psychoses created some sort of “human nature” where the individual was somehow in control of his/her own impulses, causing him/her to act, or not act or have a natural propensity to act. He was, of course, also known as Freud, who was very popular in the 1940s, as he was known by an array of other popular and highly respected names in the field. Schlossberg’s original theories about the origins of personality were not as new as those of sociolinguistics, but there were some changes of thought in his methodology because it was published in the 1950s (he left Yale in 1955). One of the things he called Freud’s “Theories of the Human Soul,” was actually a form of psychotherapy for the soul itself. (These Freudian explanations of the human psyche were not new, however.) What Schlossberg and his followers did, however, was create a series of theories to test and describe the nature of psychology. These theories included the following:
The hypothesis of an innate tendency to ‘do something’ (i.e., feel pain) that is based on the natural tendency to respond in some manner to pain and pain-producing stimuli that are directly harmful and the like,
the theory of “the human psyche” as applied to the “bad” or undesirable behavior of certain people (i.e., people who are socially undesirable, psychopathic), or
these theories were then repeated in various versions to test and explain more precisely what the people are telling us is the truth of the phenomenon.
I’ve written a lot on these claims about psychology, but one of the things I’ve neglected to mention was that these theories were only applied to the human psyche in a way that led them to a large and diverse sample of people who were well known, well-respected people who were on track to be successful in life. This meant a lot of people did not necessarily know that people who appeared to be well-known and reputable had been trying to help them with various social problems before the fact. Indeed,
A Brief History of Abraham Maslow and the History of Psychoanalysis
What happened to psychoanalysis until the 1960s?
When a sociologist began research into the origin of personality and behavior at the time it was founded in the late 1940s, it was a very controversial topic. In particular, I wasn’t very interested in the development of sociolinguistics as a discipline, but rather sociolinguistics as a field of investigation. That particular research, “Psychology’s ‘Origin,” was carried on by an English professor named John Schlossberg. Schlossberg, who had studied psychology, was a sociologist at Yale University and an expert on the origins of personality. He also believed that psychoses created some sort of “human nature” where the individual was somehow in control of his/her own impulses, causing him/her to act, or not act or have a natural propensity to act. He was, of course, also known as Freud, who was very popular in the 1940s, as he was known by an array of other popular and highly respected names in the field. Schlossberg’s original theories about the origins of personality were not as new as those of sociolinguistics, but there were some changes of thought in his methodology because it was published in the 1950s (he left Yale in 1955). One of the things he called Freud’s “Theories of the Human Soul,” was actually a form of psychotherapy for the soul itself. (These Freudian explanations of the human psyche were not new, however.) What Schlossberg and his followers did, however, was create a series of theories to test and describe the nature of psychology. These theories included the following:
The hypothesis of an innate tendency to ‘do something’ (i.e., feel pain) that is based on the natural tendency to respond in some manner to pain and pain-producing stimuli that are directly harmful and the like,
the theory of “the human psyche” as applied to the “bad” or undesirable behavior of certain people (i.e., people who are socially undesirable, psychopathic), or
these theories were then repeated in various versions to test and explain more precisely what the people are telling us is the truth of the phenomenon.
I’ve written a lot on these claims about psychology, but one of the things I’ve neglected to mention was that these theories were only applied to the human psyche in a way that led them to a large and diverse sample of people who were well known, well-respected people who were on track to be successful in life. This meant a lot of people did not necessarily know that people who appeared to be well-known and reputable had been trying to help them with various social problems before the fact. Indeed,
A Brief History of Abraham Maslow and the History of Psychoanalysis
What happened to psychoanalysis until the 1960s?
When a sociologist began research into the origin of personality and behavior at the time it was founded in the late 1940s, it was a very controversial topic. In particular, I wasn’t very interested in the development of sociolinguistics as a discipline, but rather sociolinguistics as a field of investigation. That particular research, “Psychology’s ‘Origin,” was carried on by an English professor named John Schlossberg. Schlossberg, who had studied psychology, was a sociologist at Yale University and an expert on the origins of personality. He also believed that psychoses created some sort of “human nature” where the individual was somehow in control of his/her own impulses, causing him/her to act, or not act or have a natural propensity to act. He was, of course, also known as Freud, who was very popular in the 1940s, as he was known by an array of other popular and highly respected names in the field. Schlossberg’s original theories about the origins of personality were not as new as those of sociolinguistics, but there were some changes of thought in his methodology because it was published in the 1950s (he left Yale in 1955). One of the things he called Freud’s “Theories of the Human Soul,” was actually a form of psychotherapy for the soul itself. (These Freudian explanations of the human psyche were not new, however.) What Schlossberg and his followers did, however, was create a series of theories to test and describe the nature of psychology. These theories included the following:
The hypothesis of an innate tendency to ‘do something’ (i.e., feel pain) that is based on the natural tendency to respond in some manner to pain and pain-producing stimuli that are directly harmful and the like,
the theory of “the human psyche” as applied to the “bad” or undesirable behavior of certain people (i.e., people who are socially undesirable, psychopathic), or
these theories were then repeated in various versions to test and explain more precisely what the people are telling us is the truth of the phenomenon.
I’ve written a lot on these claims about psychology, but one of the things I’ve neglected to mention was that these theories were only applied to the human psyche in a way that led them to a large and diverse sample of people who were well known, well-respected people who were on track to be successful in life. This meant a lot of people did not necessarily know that people who appeared to be well-known and reputable had been trying to help them with various social problems before the fact. Indeed,
The hierarchy of needs is one of the key elements of the theory of Abraham Maslow. He acknowledged that there were a variety of diverse forces of motivation or the needs being pertained to, which influence the behavior of humans, and he also fashioned the hierarchy of needs in order to grasp the understanding of how diverse forces of motivation function in association with another (Krapp, 2005). For example, if in a certain point a person were influenced by a need for security and safety and need for food, which among these two groups of needs will have the most influence on the behavior of the person? Abraham Maslow sought to explicate on how a person will act in response in such given situation, and as well as to be aware of how people came to be subjective by further complexity of higher needs.
A further element of significance on the theory of Maslow is the self-actualization concept. This term, is borrowed from Kurt Goldstein, a neuropsychologist, is a term which describes the humans tendency to accomplish their potentials, to be what they can be. Maslow had felt that the self-actualization need will surface after the other needs were satisfied reasonably, and he was chiefly involved in people who were responding to such need. He had felt that it was imperative to be aware and value motivation, for the reason that he saw it as a solution to achieving an ideal society.
During his later years, Abraham Maslow dedicated the majority of his energy to discovering the ways wherein which the principles of human potential in a diversity of fields can be put into application. The theory of Maslow is not a wide-ranging theory of personality; it only states a little regarding the development process or on the mental disorders origins. Regardless of these restrictions, the theory of Maslow, together with its prominence on hale and hearty functioning, was able to achieve a central influence on psychoanalysis and other professions both on business arena and education. (Krapp, 2005)