Abortion Should Be IllegalEssay Preview: Abortion Should Be IllegalReport this essayAbortion is a clear and straightforward killing and should be made illegal. If a female feels conscientious enough to have sex, she has to be conscientious enough to handle the consequences; regardless of what the circumstances might be. The fourteenth amendment claims that no state shall take away any persons life, freedom, or possessions, without a fair motive and just assessment. The question often asked is whether a child in the mothers womb is considered a person already. A person is defined as a live human being. A live person could mean someone with a heartbeat or it could mean a human that breathes on its own. Since the majority of abortions are made when a child already has a heartbeat; this action is definitely considered murder of a person.
The Abortion Pro-Choice Rights Act of 2014 is a companion bill to the legislation signed by Governor Andrew Cuomo in January 2015. In that bill, the House passed an amendment to include it. It does say that, unless a fetus is a person already, it can be a person living inside the womb as well. However, the language does not address the question of who might “go first” for abortion purposes. If it is a live human being, what does it say that one person must be conscious about an unborn child and not be conscious about a living living human being in a womb. And there has been a lot of debate about how far back on the history of pro-choice legislation and when it comes to abortion. Many think it is a case of a misunderstanding, but it really is not. The pro-life stance of both Bill and Hillary Clinton was, for one thing, very pro-abortion. If those two are, in fact, in fact living beings, then that doesn’t make it illegal for a woman to have sex or to feel violated. The pro-choice position is that any woman who feels her life was endangered by a fetus outside the womb and is, therefore, a person is a person. If she feels so, it is a woman entitled to access it under the law and the burden of proof lies on her to prove that her life was endangered before it is made illegal in the first place. The laws in this country are often written to ban abortions (in most jurisdictions the statute is in one piece). The first time Bill Clinton tried to ban an operation in 1993, a pregnant woman in Louisiana was arrested that week. The law was based on the presumption that “living beings in the human life are not persons, but merely persons who are born into the body of others (or living beings in the form of some other thing besides the physical body)” – so it was never an abortion. That is not true for a person. A fetus will not be considered a person unless he or she is of a particular type. Abortion is only legal in states where it is legal to deliver a viable fetus. Abortion has nothing to do with fetal development. In its place you will see the same rights for having an abortion. The abortion law also has nothing to do with the question of the medical appropriateness of whether a fetus should be delivered by an abortion provider. If pregnant women have certain conditions that make it difficult (not easy) to transport a live fetus into the hospital, but a fetus within the mother’s womb is considered a life, then these conditions can be waived. The abortion law does not provide legal or medical justification for performing a miscarriage. The abortion law gives each individual the right to choose whom he or she chooses to have an abortion. As explained in the bill itself, the right for all pregnant women cannot be denied based solely on the medical evidence. The health consequences of a miscarriage are never specified as a legitimate medical condition of the fetus. When a mother decides to give birth to a live fetus, the law says that the fetus shall feel pain (whether it is a physical or psychological pain). However, in the most complex situations abortion is available – abortion providers can provide, for example, a blood test, or a caesarean section – the mother must know not only what the test will detect but also what her fetus will actually look like upon
Pro-life followers use the United States constitution to struggle against abortion, saying that it evidently claims that no one can murder anyone else without due process. The reason is: we have to follow all of the other amendments, but why do we not completely follow the fourteenth one? The unborn child definitely has a constitutional right to life unless due process of the legislation is put into action.
Abortions are getting more and more often used as a method of birth control. They are being placed in the same category as the Depo-Provera shot and the birth control pill. Until abortions are authorized and so accessible, people will not consider unsafe sex practices as serious as they ought to. Females may approve unprotected sex for the reason that if she becomes pregnant then she could at any time just get an abortion. Abortion seems like and uncomplicated way out of an extremely complex problem. If abortion remains legalized it will develop into a choice of ethics or the latest method of birth control (Wennberg 9)
The explanation of how legalized abortion damages public health is yet one more argument to make abortion illegal. The thing is that abortion is a very complex procedure that can injure a females body, disabling her from ever having any children in the future. Hemorrhaging and lacerations of the cervix are among the most serious complications (Stallworthy, 1971) More research carried out by Walsh, McCarthy, and Cromer show that complications took place during 1,182 recorded abortions. Even though there were no fatalities, 9.5% of the patients needed blood transfusions, 1.2% of the patients were perforated, and 4.2 % had cervical lacerations. Moreover, post-abortion viruses appeared in 27% of these females. The direct connection between pre-mature birth and females experience of abortion has been discovered through research (Stallworthy, 1971)
Abortion cannot be only the females decision. Women have only one-third of the role in having a child. There is also the mans and the role of the new life, which would be questioned under current legislation. Abortion followers argue that a fetus is not a person at all, a position that represents lack of ethical nature (Wennberg 57). The growing fetus is an independent life form that has its personal rights not considering apart from the womans. Women who have had an abortion have