Web-Based Vs. Paper-Based PhrWeb-based vs. Paper-based PHR Shawntriece PoindexterRasmussen CollegeWeb-based vs. Paper-based PHRPaper-based PHR’s appear to be a lot more popular than the web-based records. Most likely because the paper has been the standard for quite a while, and it has been effortlessly available without needing the internet. Paper-based PHR’s offer the benefit of having accessible information right away, especially when an internet connection is not readily available. While seeing a specialist, one can ask for a duplicate of their records. In all probability, the customer needs to sign an authorization to release Medical information, before it is released. Paper-based PHR’s, however, are not always the cheapest method and can be useless in circumstances where it is lost or destroyed the information can be are hard to replace. Whereas web-based PHR’s can be kept on a server and are always available, with an internet connection and the right software.
Internet-supported PHR’s allow health information to be accessed and edited within a Web browser. They have the benefit of being accessible from any place with an Internet connection and compatible Web browser. The internet enables the PHR to be interactive, and to be developed and updated with new medical information and history of the patient or family member. While some web-based PHR’s are primarily an accessory to already established medical records on file with providers, others try to become the primary medical resource. Because Web-based PHR’s are kept on a server separate from the consumers personal computer, it is implied that the data is commonly more available and more likely to have sturdy backup procedures to shield it from damage and piracy. With any information kept electronically, unauthorized access is a significant concern for a lot Americans with Web-based PHR’s.
The FDA and the Consumer Product Safety Commission in 2014 said Web-based PHR’s were safer than traditional methods. This is why, in 2015, the FDA added Web-based PHR’s as a qualifying standard. The FDA set an appropriate standard to help providers comply with the PHR and provide data.
A Web-based PHR’ is used to provide patient records and medical records to a patient’s physician. As such, a Web-based PHR should always be viewed with particular care in patients who are considering obtaining medical records from a physician, such as patients with a family history of cancer. Web-based PHR’s should also be read with caution for patients with kidney disease or who are taking medication, especially in young children or for children with serious or unusual medical complications. Web-based PHR’s may also aid in the provision and storage of patient health and/or family history if they meet FDA-registered safety guidelines.
Health professionals, including medical cardiologists, physicians and other health-care professionals, should also understand that Web-based PHR’s provide patient records and medical records, among other things, to a physician. To avoid inadvertently sending personal information to a doctor regarding patient records, physicians should keep Web-based PHR’s up-to-date on health practices.
Many Web-based PHR’s are also used in hospital care by pediatricians, dentists, osteopaths, surgeons and other health-care professionals. Web-based PHR’s help the health care industry provide better quality of life and increase overall quality of practice. More importantly, Web-based PHR’s should assist patient care in helping patients be able to obtain care and benefit from it.
The Medical Information Access (MACA) Privacy Protection Act is one of three pieces of legislation designed to improve the way the public interacts with data in health care. MACA allows physicians, health-care providers, pharmacists and other health employees to access patient data and medical record data without the physician’s obligation to provide records regarding the patient. The law enables doctors, health-care providers and other health-care professionals to access the patient’s information without the physician’s having to provide any health-care history or records. Allowing Health Care Providers to Provide Health Information May Increase Access to Care
While the law does not allow for physician ownership on health-care information, physicians are free to provide health information to health-care providers under their own discretion. The health-care providers can seek a court order to authorize the accessing of their patient information without their consent. This makes it safer for health care providers to access medical records.
The law does prohibit all health-care providers from using medically inappropriate information without patient consent.
The law may prohibit even the most private health facilities from using medically inappropriate data about the patient. If the health care facility uses medically inappropriate information to avoid its own health-care risk and risks of exposure to hazardous chemical or other hazardous substances and other harmful substances to the public, this section applies.
Doctors may also opt-out of using certain medical information. This may be by notifying an insurer, by agreeing to provide insurance coverage, or by refusing to provide insurance coverage because of medical information, unless the physician has expressly informed that the insurer is not aware of the medical information.
Health Care Providers Should Know the Data
The FDA and the CFPB have