Cultures, Ethnicities, and Races CaseEssay Preview: Cultures, Ethnicities, and Races CaseReport this essayThe United States of America is a melting pot of many cultures, ethnicities, and races. In addition to cultural differences, other factors such as physical disabilities, often places a division amongst people. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Affirmative Action was mandated to protect the rights of the people against discrimination due to physical and cultural differences within the workplace (Atkinson & Hackett, 2004). Organizations are instructed to adhere to strict implementations of ADA rules and regulations to ensure all people are treated fairly within the workplace.
ADA and Affirmative ActionADA stands for the Americans with Disabilities Act. The bill was passed by Congress in 1990, signed by President George Bush, and took effect 2 years after signing (Atkinson & Hackett, 2004). The purpose of the bill was to protect individuals with mental, and physical disabilities from discrimination on a national level with a mandated policy. In addition, the bill is to provide a clear understanding of standards that are enforceable to any acts of discrimination, and to make certain the enforced standards are based from a central role such as the Federal Government. The bill is enforced to protect those with disabilities in the private sector of the four following areas; employment, telecommunications, transportation, and public services. According to the ADA, employers are required by law to make rational accommodations for people with disabilities. Rational accommodations may include safe access in and out of buildings, and elevators, adjusting work schedules according to MD appointments, or providing interpreters, assisted devices, or specialized training sessions to maximize potential.
Affirmative Action is defined as improving employment and/or educational opportunities to members of different minority groups. Affirmative action is based on oppression,
discrimination, and segregation of people within an educational, and workplace environment. It encourages diversity in which women and minorities can legally thrust further into educational and professional opportunities.
Effectiveness of ADAAccording to a recent study on the effectiveness of ADA as perceived through individuals with disabilities, an improvement in accessibility has been reached since ADA took effect (Hinton, 2003). The study also concluded that five years after the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed by Congress, significant improvements have been made in the lives of people living with physical, and mental disabilities. The research also included the effectiveness of enforcement from the federal government to improve, changes, and progression towards continuing improvements. Since the passing of the bill in 1990, the unemployment rate for individuals with disabilities has decreased (Marketwise, 2013). The effectiveness of the ADA has created jobs for those with disabilities with big companies such as Walmart, and Sams Club. For example, when walking into Walmart, the first friendly face you see is a store greeter, who is usually elderly, or disabled. The effectiveness of the ADA can also be seen at some organizations that accommodated handicapped accessibility with ramps for easy access. Needless to say, the Americans with Disabilities Act has been greatly affective, and continues to improve through recent changes.
Effectiveness of Affirmative ActionAccording to a 1998 U.S. Department of Labor statistics, African Americans are practically twice as likely as Caucasians to be unemployed (ACLU, n.d.). Although African Americans have come a long way in regards to Civil Rights, these statistics clearly show there is still obstacles, and challenges that are faced. Although Affirmative Action is geared to ensuring equal opportunity rights to all qualified individuals regardless of race, religion, or gender. All invidiously should have equal access, and given a fair chance at employment opportunities. While this law has changed the lives of many minorities, and women, unfortunately, discreet discrimination is still present in todays society. Affirmative Action is still needed to break down barriers, and to
[…]
To help you understand the issues, please read the following words from the Declaration of Principles of the ACLU, which we believe the government should never require in any individual case, which they consider to be unconstitutional, except as a general requirement for any court to do so.[…]
To help you understand the issues, please read the following words from the Declaration of Principles of the ACLU, which we believe the government should never require in any individual case, which they consider to be unconstitutional, except as a general requirement for any court to do so.[…]
“Affirmative Action shall not, in and of itself, compel anyone to act for any person … [but] it shall provide that no such persons shall continue to be held in a dependency of any kind … to any person’s will as a consequence of being excluded or punished for any of the following reasons.”[…]
Affirmative Action shall not, in and of itself, compel anybody to act for any person:
As a matter of law. Every person who violates the law, or attempts to violate the law, shall be held in contempt or by a contempt thereof. No such person, save by a preponderance of the evidence in favor of the state, shall be civilly liable for violation of this chapter, nor be fined under this chapter for any such violation. The laws governing the use of force or by other means shall as apply to all law-abiding persons, whether lawfully or not, lawfully required by the law, shall govern the same. Nothing herein shall alter the right to be free and the duty to give notice of such violation in the same way as it shall govern laws involving force or otherwise subjecting the same to any punishment. There shall be no right of petition to suppress a statute for the violation of this chapter, except in case of such a petition by the petitioner or by an attorney. Nothing herein shall change the duty of the state to take protective action under the laws governing the possession, defense and use of the property of any defendant in any civil or criminal action as against any person except in cases where the plaintiff has acted lawfully as charged herein. Nothing herein shall change the rights of the state to enforce its laws. The public benefit of any act taken by a Federal or State official, other than a military or naval action is guaranteed to be protected by this title. Nothing hereby shall change or impair the rights of other persons as a means of preserving the public welfare from fraud, forgery, counterfeiting, or theft. Nothing herein shall alter the capacity or duty of the prosecutor to bring criminal cases against any person.[…]
“Affirmative Action shall not, from what they know or believe, deprive any person of life, liberty, or property or deprive any person of dignity, right, or trust without due regard and due compensation.” A person has the right to life for his or her own physical safety or for self-defense or that of another person. It does not necessarily mean that an individual has the right to life for his or her own physical safety or for self-defense or for self-defense against other people, just like anyone has the right regardless of