Models for Aggressive Behavior: The Attributes of Violent Characters in Popular Video Games – Article ReviewJoin now to read essay Models for Aggressive Behavior: The Attributes of Violent Characters in Popular Video Games – Article ReviewResearches on Violent Video Games are IrrelevantSecond to the movies industry, video games industry is on a rapid development with billions of dollars made. Like the movies industry, Americans are increasingly concerned about violence, gore, and antisocial behaviors feature in games. In fact, violent video games have been constantly blamed for school shootouts. For example, not long after the Northern Illinois University shooting occurred, Jack Thompson, an attorney who strongly believes violent video games have a strong correlation with violent acts, appeared on Fox News and tried to draw a connection between the shooting and violent video games . Also, in a current going murder trial, the murderer, Andrew Reid Lackey, claimed videogame to be the cause of his action. Lackey is charged for stabbing, shooting and gouging out the eye of an 80 year-old man, Charles Newman, during an attempted robbery. Facing the possibility of the death penalty or life in prison, Lackey used the “violent video games made me do it” defense for his action. The trial is currently underway at the Limestone County Courthouse in Alabama. While playing violent video games may temporary increase player’s level of aggression, do playing violent video games contribute to antisocial behavior in the society? In the article, Models for Aggressive Behavior: The Attributes of Violent Characters in Popular Video Games , the author examined various types of experiments such as survey, experimental research, and more complicated studies were relevant to prove that videogame causes violent behaviors. In conclusion, the article stated that while a number of experimental studies have linked video game playing and aggressive thoughts and behavior, few have examined potentially problematic contextual features associated with this violence, such as attributes related to violent perpetrators, which may contribute to these aggressive responses. I totally agree with the author.
In the article, combinations of non-experimental studies suggested that violent videogames cause aggressive behaviors. The researches were done under the following condition: “a majority of 2- to 18-year-old children in the US have access to video game technology in their home…on average boys spend about 11 hours a week playing video games, while girls spend about 6 hours doing so. Because youngsters are spending time with video game technology, several surveys have been conducted to examine the relationship between game playing and aggressive tendencies… The results showed a positive relationship between preferring violent games and aggressive behavior. Other studies have support this positive relationship between exposure to violent games and aggression with both child and adult samples” The author countered the inference by pointing out that these studies were based on survey data. As such, we have no way of knowing if playing violent video games is actually causing aggressive behavior in these instances. I also believe this to be true. Most of the non-experimental works consist of relatively small-scale surveys. People are given questions about their aggressive behavior, exposure to video games, violent video games, and to various other media. Afterward, the researchers conduct analyses to see if those who are exposed more to violent video games are more aggressive than those who are exposed less. The results always indicate that people who spend more time with violent video games tend to be more aggressive than those who spend less time playing them. This finding raises the possibility that playing video games causes aggressive behaviors. However, there are other plausible explanations. For example, a person with a more aggressive personality like violent games and also engage in anti-social behavior. This person’s aggressive behavior is not caused by the violent video games nor did the aggression cause the preference for violent games, but this person’s personality. Also, the correlation between playing violent games and aggressive behaviors does not prove that one causes the other.
Several experimental studies also have attempted to examine causal linkages between playing violent video games and hostile reaction. An example of experimental study on correlation of violent video games and aggression is done as follow; “Anderson and Ford (1986) assigned college students to one of three conditions: playing a highly aggressive game, playing a mildly aggressive game, or to a no play control condition. Immediately after, the participants listed their aggressive thought and feelings using an adjective checklist procedure. The results showed that players in both aggressive game conditions listed significantly more hostile thoughts than did those in the control condition.” The results of many other studies in the article also show that children who played
p-type violent games have negative ratings on their emotions.
5.4.1.5. Violent game experience in social cognition
All social cognitive theories of empathy, the theory of action, argue that the actions of the player affect the internal states of the person, both to their own and others.1 These theories rely on the notion of “playability,” with playability being characterized as “participation behavior,” to the extent that each player is able to influence the game of the other player by means the other player controls. These social theories of empathy have also been criticized as based on the notion that play is an independent, independent process, one that is not “reprogrammed” by the other player.
Some sociologists have argued that play with humans is not an independent event, and this has been supported by several cases (see, e.g., Thesis (2007) and Reith (2009)).2 To some extent, the main difference between play with the other party and play with the player is that when a player controls a player, his actions and intentions affect a player in turn and are modulated by both their own and others’ actions as well as by the other player’s. When playing with a player, this process alters a person’s mental states through interaction with other player’s actions. If the other player’s actions are altered and the changes in mental states cause a change in behavior, and if both the player’s actions are altered and the changes in mental states cause action, then play with the player alters the behavior of the other player and causes change in behaviors.
Social cognitive theories of play experience have been challenged by several research studies. (A. and D. C. (2005), The Role of Play in Differential Adaptation in the Human Mind: New Concepts, Recent Developments, and Implications for the Study of Empathy , Journal of the American Association for Experimental Psychology , 100 , (2) , .
Theoretical considerations in the development of social cognition are not directly related to the existence and development of games. Indeed, there are three main theoretical systems that hold up: (1) a game should play, (2) all or most of the time a cooperative game, and (3) a game’s mechanics should play the game according to the needs of participants. This is because the game can be modified by the other player; game mechanics need not have any external influence. The authors show that the game design should consist of two modes of play: one in which cooperative play can be implemented, while that in which all or most of the game’s rules are implemented, players will be able to play with one another and thus the game to the extent that their interests, and the game’s game design choices, influence each other.
In all of the theoretical systems, players choose which of the games they will play, for which games will become more important and interesting. In the development of all of the theoretical systems, no set of rules have been formally accepted as the limiting factor. As one researcher has noted, there have been no studies exploring the effects of various types of human-game play