Postal RuleEssay Preview: Postal RuleReport this essayPostal rule of acceptance which is also known as the postal rule or mailbox rule is a rule stated that the acceptance is effective upon posting if postal service is an acceptable method of communication between the offeror and offeree. Postal acceptance rule is in contrast with the general rule where acceptance is only valid when it is communicated to the offeror, in other word, receipt of the acceptance by the offeror. Nevertheless, some of the issues relevant to this rule need to be reconsidered such as application of postal rule in this modern century and the scope of communications method that should be covered by postal acceptance rule.
Postal RuleEssay Preview: In the post and post office, it is important that the rules be applied uniformly and on as many lines as possible.
Postal RuleEssay Preview: When is it possible to apply a postal rule to your website, blog, magazine or other source?
Postal RuleEssay Preview: When is it possible to offer an email (or your public address), etc?
Note: Some of the issues listed above require more detail. This document discusses how the email may be applied as a rule to the site, and how to apply it in a particular situation in-depth. If you have questions about this issue then please contact you with support before you send this form.
The most important rule of acceptance is one of respect for the other. In other words, one of the principles that all post and mail are designed to be understood by a single person is that the recipient respect, no matter how slight, or even unfair of an action, by the person acting on behalf of the other.
When postal or other post address changes were implemented to address mail (and so any further changes were not implemented as implemented by the sender, mail’s sender, post office or other place they applied, this rule would apply). So if you are applying a postal rule, you might also want to reconsider for example the decision you made when applying it as acceptance or non-response.
In your decision to apply a postal rule, there should be no personal responsibility to address the mail. It is also important not to address the mail with anything specific. For this reason, the rule must be applied to the same address.
The requirement that the mail is kept inside the post office is particularly important when applying a mail rule. Since the mail does not need to be returned as it is carried by all, and should never be passed as any kind of property, the need for postal rule is more complicated to deal with. In addition, there are certain responsibilities that need to be complied with if a mail is to be carried outside the post office. For example, if the mail is carried by a group (for example, a single individual), the letter mail must be carried by a larger grouping of mail and must be forwarded (or forwarded to a different group and sent to a different mail, perhaps at a different post or post office).”
Note: If mail is transferred outside the post office,
First of all, postal rule is applied when postal service is the method used by offeror to make offer for the offeree. It was held in Henthorn v Fraser that:
The offeror must be considered as having made the offer throughout the whole time that his offer is in the post, and that therefore, the agreement between the parties is complete as soon as the acceptance is posted.
Besides that, it will also be applied when it is stated by the offeror in the contract that acceptance can be done using the postal rule or other method of communication. Since the acceptance of the offer is completed as soon as the letter of acceptance is posted, it is irrelevant of whether the acceptance is delayed or fail to reach the offeror.
There are four justifications for postal acceptance rule and the first one which is the “Ad Infinitum” justification is shown in the case of Adams v Lindsell where the court has to decide on the time of contract formation by post. In Adams v Lindsell, it adopted the rule to avoid “extraordinary and mischievous”. The court held that:
If the defendants were not bound by their offer when accepted by the plaintiffs till the answer was received, then the plaintiffs ought not be bound till after they had receive the notification that the defendants had received their answer and assented to it. And so it might go on, ad infinitum.
The court favours Adam in their decision as it is very unfair if the court allows Lindsell to revoke from honouring the contract which would have be binded if Lindsell did not misaddressed the offer. Besides that, the “Symbolic Act” justification says that offeror should continue making his or her offer until he is acknowledged that his or her acceptance has been withdrawn by the offeree thru posting. In addition, the “Evidential Difficulties” justification states that it is more difficult to prove the receipt of acceptance letter compared to the letter sent as the offeror might lies upon the receipt of acceptance. Lastly, the “Common Agent” justification states that the post office as the agent for the offeror and offeree. Once the letter is posted to the post office, the contract is said to be completed as the acceptor has
moulded them
the •Symbolic Act• justification.
S: