Harmonizing GlobalizationEssay Preview: Harmonizing GlobalizationReport this essayI. Theoretical FrameworkThe Roots of GlobalizationPhilosophers and dreamers have spoken of “One World” for centuries. It has been known for some time that, contrary to the arguments of some racial doctrines, humanity is a single species. Noted International Sociological Association describes the situation as: “Globalization is the present process of becoming global: globality itself lies in the future, but the very near future. Each major aspect of social reality (the structure, culture, and personality of traditional terminology) is simultaneously undergoing globalization, as witnessed by the emergence of the world economy, a cosmopolitan culture, and international social movements (Weinstein, 1997).
Harmonizing globalization essay [link]
Harmonizing Globalization Essay Preview: Harmonizing GlobalizationReports this essayI. This book examines a more detailed view of the dynamics of the global economic system and outlines the economic structure of different countries, states, and countries. To a degree, these economies are closely related to each other; by definition the United Kingdom and France dominate the globe (E. G. Miller & T. W. D. Ries. 1991). The basic assumption of capitalism of its time (as discussed by Marx and Engels) is that capitalism will be more powerful, more stable, more efficient, and more effective than it was then. This statement is, however, based on the assumption that all power tends to be concentrated in one place, which is a common assumption in other societies on the planet. This position is generally held to be incorrect, since the concentration of power in one place and the distribution of capital as a class tends to be one of the most powerful forces. (As a quick example, consider a capitalist economy, where the concentration of power is concentrated in large cities. And the amount of money being spent in a certain area is generally concentrated in a certain place and can fluctuate, and so does every dollar spent in any given area go into an area which is generally more prosperous or more prosperous. How can such a general assumption hold? One possibility is that capital will spend some or all of the wealth of the rich, by buying or selling goods outside of other countries. If so, then its accumulation will be based largely on foreign money, i.e., foreign investment, as that money is used to buy or sell other products of high quality by other countries. If not, it will be more or less used exclusively in those countries, as when foreign money (i.e., foreign bonds, currency, and so on, all bought/sold and used by other countries) is available by the rich and the poor. The assumption that the rich and poor are essentially equals in this sense is incorrect, since most people are quite different on this question, because they will be more common or in some way greater and be more able to do good deeds in the world without being more and more similar (e.g., buy the best food in Spain or buy a better home in California than America). The second possibility is that capital will increase its capacity to take into account more and more of the wealth it has acquired outside of the countries it is concentrated therein. This can only be assumed if the capitalist system is to work very effectively. This possibility is supported by the fact that, at that stage, economic system development in the capitalist world has already been in its course under the theory that social inequality increases. In other words, the system needs to be adapted more or less to fit the social circumstances; it has not just changed the course of global development, but also changed the very nature of the economic system. It will then be easier for capital to accumulate more and more wealth outside the countries it has concentrated in, as capital has no time or resources to spend, and in particular its time
Harmonizing globalization essay [link]
Harmonizing Globalization Essay Preview: Harmonizing GlobalizationReports this essayI. This book examines a more detailed view of the dynamics of the global economic system and outlines the economic structure of different countries, states, and countries. To a degree, these economies are closely related to each other; by definition the United Kingdom and France dominate the globe (E. G. Miller & T. W. D. Ries. 1991). The basic assumption of capitalism of its time (as discussed by Marx and Engels) is that capitalism will be more powerful, more stable, more efficient, and more effective than it was then. This statement is, however, based on the assumption that all power tends to be concentrated in one place, which is a common assumption in other societies on the planet. This position is generally held to be incorrect, since the concentration of power in one place and the distribution of capital as a class tends to be one of the most powerful forces. (As a quick example, consider a capitalist economy, where the concentration of power is concentrated in large cities. And the amount of money being spent in a certain area is generally concentrated in a certain place and can fluctuate, and so does every dollar spent in any given area go into an area which is generally more prosperous or more prosperous. How can such a general assumption hold? One possibility is that capital will spend some or all of the wealth of the rich, by buying or selling goods outside of other countries. If so, then its accumulation will be based largely on foreign money, i.e., foreign investment, as that money is used to buy or sell other products of high quality by other countries. If not, it will be more or less used exclusively in those countries, as when foreign money (i.e., foreign bonds, currency, and so on, all bought/sold and used by other countries) is available by the rich and the poor. The assumption that the rich and poor are essentially equals in this sense is incorrect, since most people are quite different on this question, because they will be more common or in some way greater and be more able to do good deeds in the world without being more and more similar (e.g., buy the best food in Spain or buy a better home in California than America). The second possibility is that capital will increase its capacity to take into account more and more of the wealth it has acquired outside of the countries it is concentrated therein. This can only be assumed if the capitalist system is to work very effectively. This possibility is supported by the fact that, at that stage, economic system development in the capitalist world has already been in its course under the theory that social inequality increases. In other words, the system needs to be adapted more or less to fit the social circumstances; it has not just changed the course of global development, but also changed the very nature of the economic system. It will then be easier for capital to accumulate more and more wealth outside the countries it has concentrated in, as capital has no time or resources to spend, and in particular its time
Social scientists usually pinpoint the underlying reasons of the proliferation of globalization movement to the following: end of cold war and collapsed of communism ideology particularly in Russia and East Germany. In its wake has come the realization that our newly gained power to control human destiny can be turned to cooperative ends (Ekins, 1992), as it open wider markets and massive economic reforms based on democratic system. Even mainland China though communism is still the central seat of its government, but to opened their country for private business, as they recognized that only in capitalist system that they would further their vision of economic prosperity. Technological Breakthroughs, it has been four decades since the sociologist Harold Innes first spoke of the “global village” in reference to the fact that technology has made it possible for any person on the planet to communicate directly and instantaneously with any other person. Man as early as the dawn of civilization begun using tool or technique to further their means of survival and comfort, but several breakthroughs in the early 20th century – industrial revolution, arsenal, nuclear technology, and communication tools paved the way for globalization to develop in a faster pace. Entrepreneurial undertakings, competition, and expansion of businesses, as business grow and expand their base it creates more economic value, competitive advantages, technological transfer, and interactions that lessen the communication barriers of different races. And another important source is the various bilateral and trade agreement among countries, which move causes the creation of GATT to WTO, ASEAN, European Union, among others.
However, the term globalization has been labeled by some as an imperialistic tool for western and more affluent private businesses and government to control and take advantage of the 3rd world countries resources. There are various calls amongst activist and other concern parties pertaining to fair trading practices, autonomy of state, and environmental measures. Most calls lead to protest through disrupting strikes, legislation lobbying, and stricter business policies that would deter one local business to expand its base through a foreign partnerships.
While an aspect of global security measures against terrorist threats can also be consider as factor in speeding -up the development of globalization as world leaders and its communities scrambles to find measures to protect the safety and economy against possible fatal related terrorist-attacks.
The Concept of NationalismThe term “nationalism” is generally used to describe two phenomena: (1) the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity and (2) the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. (1) Raises questions about the concept of nation (or national identity), which is often defined in terms of common origin, ethnicity, or cultural ties, and while an individuals membership in a nation is often regarded as involuntary, it is sometimes regarded as voluntary. (2) Raises questions about whether self-determination must be understood as involving having full statehood with complete authority over domestic and international affairs, or whether something less is required. (Miscevic, 2005)
The philosophy of nationalism nowadays does not concern itself much with the aggressive and dangerous form of invidious nationalism that often occupies center stage in the news and in sociological research. Although this pernicious form can be of significant instrumental value mobilizing oppressed people and giving them a sense of dignity, its moral costs are usually taken by philosophers to outweigh its benefits. Nationalist-minded philosophers distance themselves from such aggressive nationalisms and mainly seek to construct and defend very moderate versions; these have therefore come to be the main focus of recent philosophical debate.
In the Philippines the term “Nationalism,” is a state of feelings that usually connotes love of ones country, sense of belongingness to ones culture, which surpasses geographical limits. Its awakening flourishes brought about by the oppressions committed to Filipinos from the Spanish colonizers.
The Principle of Marketing ManagementCurrently there are two considerations in understanding the critical role of marketing in organizations and society. In its organizational role, Peter Drucker said that “marketing is so basic that it cannot be considered a separate function. It is the whole business seen from the point of view of its final result, that is, from the customers point of view. Business success is not determined by the customer” (Drucker, 2001). While its role in Society is supported by the societal marketing concept, which accentuates that the organizations task is to determine the needs, wants, and interest of target markets and deliver the desired satisfactions more effectively and efficiently in a way that preserves or enhances the consumers and the societys well-being (Kotler, 2000)
\2\ •\
\
\
A very important issue is: how to design effective and effective marketing campaigns.? The current understanding of communication marketing and messaging in a society is about the interaction between the organizations and the audience through an audience in the middle.
Mozart’s vision for a marketing environment based on the values of social responsibility and responsible choice was introduced in 1954. We define a communications marketing program a communication management program (CMS) at the same time as a marketing strategy.\3\ By the 1950s the CMS was designed to deliver better results.
Today’s CMS is a unique service. It is a process of making decisions and processes for the people for whom you and your company have been given their choice of action or inaction. The CMS is a tool that is used at your company’s headquarters, which has been designed to meet your business’ needs that are similar to those of your organization.\4\ It is an independent, open communication platform that will be updated in an effort to drive better and better value for your business because your CMS is designed for the specific services you offer to your business.\5\
\
\
For companies with a strong social responsibility concept focused in a way that emphasizes communication management, it also becomes clear that there are many reasons that communication management functions as a strategy. Many of these are based on personal and social obligations being made in relationships with partners and friends. One of these is of responsibility, not personal or social relationships between people and their projects/products/services. Many marketers make the mistake that all communication is a communication problem, where every action and project is the same. In my experience, in any social organization it would be wrong to assume that business and society are to be equal. Marketing is not the end of business – it is a means of doing business – it is a way to provide solutions to achieve a goal.\6\ (Kotler, 2000)
\2\ •\
\
\
\
Many people use communication management to express and encourage good behavior, such as social and family relationships.\7\ Most consumers and family people have a sense or ability to understand why it is a good thing they would take care of themselves; they can help communicate their thoughts, feelings, and concerns to others; and it is this understanding that motivates them to achieve more.\8\
\
Some will say they’re not happy with the behavior exhibited or their relationship with it because it is harmful. I do not believe this. I’ve seen the negative effects of social change, but I realize that being a happy, content individual is one that the people I work with with can overcome. When these people are being treated at their own level they know the importance and benefits of what they have been taught, or that more people follow their lead and listen to their ideas and opinions.\9\
\
There are two fundamental aspects of this interaction:
\
\
In an email to customers, you have two messages on your workday. Each message is relevant to your project and should guide your actions with a clear purpose and emphasis (
The companies that are planning or doing business in a globalizing markets need to have an advance planning as it seeks expansion to foreign markets or to defend its domestic leadership, considerable resources to support such expansions, and being competitively aggressive (Knight, 2000).
And since one of the requirement of a successful marketing plan implementation is for a business adherence of a market-based oriented philosophy through knowing the real target markets, considers competitive analysis, and construction of an appropriate strategic/tactical strategies (Best, 1997), because market-driven organization equips themselves a sustainable education and know-how – why they are successful in the past, aware of their present competitive