Essay About Private Schools And Grant Tuition Vouchers

Mary, Where Are U
Essay Preview: Mary, Where Are U
Report this essay
The debate over whether or not the United States government should
grant tuition vouchers to the parents of children who attend private schools has
gone on for many years, and has included many powerful arguments on both
sides of the issue. Those who support the private school vouchers believe that
they are beneficial to everyone because they promote productivity in both public
and private schools alike, and they also give low-income families the chance to
give their children a quality private school education. Those in opposition to the
vouchers say that they will drain money out of the public schools, and that they
only truly help a small population, mainly the wealthy and advantaged.
Opposers also believe that the vouchers interfere with the Separation of Church
and State, since many private schools have a religious affiliation. This issue has
truly been a controversial one, with many people fighting arduously. After
reading through the various arguments for each side, one can not help but come
to their own conclusion about private school vouchers.
There have been many school voucher programs proposed in the past,
but they all seem to share one common theme. This similarity between them is
that they all promote giving households that send their children to private schools
a tax dollar-funded voucher that would cover all or most of the cost of the
schools tuition. Many of the proposals also include the right for parents to chose
which private school their child will attend. The vouchers allows students to use
the money that would be subsidized for them in a public school to go toward a
private school education. This system redirects the flow of educational funding,
bringing it to the individual family instead of the school district.
The idea of school vouchers first became popular after Milton Friedman,
an economist, released two publications, in 1956 and in 1962, that supported the
voucher plan. In his 1962 book, Capitalism and Freedom, when Friedman
discusses education, he turns to public education criticizes it for being
“unresponsive” because it has been free from competition (Lieberman,