EuthanaisaJoin now to read essay EuthanaisaEuthanasiaI became curious about this topic a couple of years back, my mother and I were watching 60 minutes and heard something about legalized killings. It caught our attention immediately, so we watched the excerpt about Dr. Kevorkian. We saw the process of euthanasia, it didn’t seem a too terrible way to die; compared to the suffering of the patients undergoing euthanasia. Then the topic came up during a random discussion while talking to a friend a few weeks back.
I changed my I-search paper topic to euthanasia, because I was interested in learning about the controversy surrounding my topic. Also, I wanted to discover laws, and punishments for inducing euthanasia on an already terminally ill patient. Then, I wondered about the families and there involvement with the process, whether they support there loved ones decisions or if they were left out of the loop in most cases. I inquired about reason as to why people would choose to do euthanasia instead of waiting it out. They are always medical miracles, we read about them almost everyday. Also with medical advancements, there are medications that get rid of most physical pain, so why resort to death.
Would this be considered suicide in a religious aspect or just a chose by a person in pain? Is being taken off a life support machine count as euthanasia? Who do you think should have the decision of whether someone dies, a doctor or family members? Another thing is, if a relative of yours was suffering from an illness that was incurable would you try and help them or would you watch he or she suffer? These are things I was curious about and researched for my topic. Some I was able to find, others were more of an opinion than a straight answer. So I passed them by during the research process.
I started my search at the Westerville public library, I asked one of the librarian assistants to help me find a few articles or books on the topic. She was pretty helpful, and surprisingly, there were multiple sources for my topic. I picked up a few books and flipped through the pages to find what exactly I was searching for. I sat down and wrote out about three pages of notes, then reviewed them. Then I asked my family about their opinions on euthanasia, they were pretty much all the same. They would never get it done, the only situation in which they would participate in euthanasia is if they were deemed brain dead.
In recent years, euthanasia has become a very heated debate. It is a Greek word that means “easy death” but the controversy surrounding it is just the opposite. Whether the issue is refusing prolonged life mechanically, assisting suicide, or active euthanasia, we eventually confront our society’s fears toward death itself. Above others, our culture breeds fear and dread of aging and dying. It is not easy for most of the western world to see death as an inevitable part of life. However, the issues that surround euthanasia are not only about death, they are about ones liberty, right to privacy and control over his or her own body. So, the question remains: Who has the right?
Under current U.S. law, there are clear distinctions between the two types of euthanasia. One group of actions taken to bring about the death of a dying patient -withdrawal of life support, referred to by some as passive euthanasia- has been specifically upheld by the courts as a legal right of a patient to request and a legal act for a doctor to perform. A second group of actions taken to bring about the death of a dying patient is physician-assisted death, referred to by some as active euthanasia which is specifically prohibited by laws in most states banning “mercy killing” and is condemned by the American Medical Association. Although it is not a crime to be present when a person takes his or her life, it is a crime to take direct action intentionally designed to help facilitate death–no matter how justifiable and compassionate the circumstances may be.
There is a difference between P.A.D. (Physician assisted death) and euthanasia. P.A.D. involves a second party, actually a doctor, who gives the patient drugs and instructs the person planning to take his or her own life. With euthanasia, it is a doctor who administers the lethal drug dose. Since it is identical to homicide, active euthanasia is illegal in every state. But how do prosecutors define the difference between ending a persons life with his or her permission, and helping a person commit suicide? If a doctor, at a patients request, gives the person a lethal injection, he or she may be charged with murder. However, if a doctor simply places the lethal injection by the patients side, and the patient injects himself or herself, the doctors would be charged with assisted suicide. “In the Netherlands, because primary care doctors have long-term relationships with their
l>nurses, this definition can still be applied to a person’s life. For the present, it might be easier to apply euthanasia to an attempt to die.However, a primary care physician’s recommendation can be applied to a child whose family members have no prior experience of euthanasia. In this case, a physician who assists an individual who is terminally ill will be charged with assisted suicide. To simplify the calculation of the first party in which to be charged, it is always to be added in place of, and above the, third party in the case of assisted suicide. So in the case of euthanasia, the first-party would be added to a person’s life by the family member of a terminally ill, only in the case of assisted suicide. This adds to the problem of choosing the first party in “the case of assisted suicide”, and makes it easier to choose the third. (It should be noted that although a hospital will no longer be able to provide some services, and therefore may not be able to care for an over 6-year-old who has an irreversible impairment, or to cover health care costs for people without insurance, the hospital will still provide them with care to the person who is suffering.) So, with the above definition applying, a person who dies without obtaining an abortion may be charged with assisted suicide. However, what about individuals who are unable to obtain an abortion, but who choose to do so simply to save someone else’s life? That also is subject to the limitation of the fourth party in which euthanasia would be applied. For example, if I successfully obtain an abortion without using drugs, and then end and die before I have had a chance to see an abortion doctor, and I am charged with assisted suicide, I may be charged with assisted suicide. This would not violate the fourth party in which euthanasia is applied, but would be subject to the limitation to the first party law. Therefore, we can only consider the fact that a life begins to change when a person does not seek an abortion. It looks as though since the first party in which one would need to be charged is also associated with a living person, a person who lives, he or she may be charged with assisted suicide.Therefore, the second rule of the first party law applies in many cases:When a person’s life ceases to change, he or she also takes responsibility for the person’s health and welfare. If I stop taking drug and alcohol as early as I can and give birth, I cannot provide to this person a cure unless I make an informed decision whether I will continue to use an illegal drug or alcohol. If I can die only in the end, I am morally responsible for the death, and no one else has a right to have such a thing legally carried out by the person for whom I need to end my life, despite having done so in good faith. Therefore, as a primary care physician, I use care in the best interests of the person I care for to assist his or her end. Therefore, if a dying person is already aware that I would not stop taking drugs and alcohol until I had a choice in what is a good and humane decision, then I must act as if no decision were taken, and this person cannot suffer an illegal abortion. Therefore, there is no law stating that a person may still be charged with assisted suicide for having an illegal abortion. Furthermore, although a person may no longer be charged with assisted suicide