Essay About Public Administration And Policy Functions Of Government

What Is Public AdministrationEssay Preview: What Is Public AdministrationReport this essayIfeoma AmakomMPA 500What is Public Administration, bureaucrat and public interest and why a career in public Administration.  In an attempt to answer these questions I will draw not only from my knowledge but also from my experience growing up and living in Nigeria.To the best of my understanding public Administration is the study of government, its processes and structure. The ever expanding governmental administration, the policy functions of government and the accompanying demands on practical administration.Public Administration is also the art and science of management as applied to the affairs of state (Waldo, 1955). Woodrow Wilson defined public administration as “detailed systematic execution of public law,” every particular application of general law is an act of public administration.Public Administration is concerned with ‘the what’ and the ‘how’ of government. The ‘what is the subject matter, the technical knowledge of a field which enables an administrator to perform his task. The ‘how’ is the technique of management.A bureaucrat is used to describe a person with an official position in the government, or a person who is in a position of power and is more concerned with procedure or policy than with people’s needs, an official who is rigidly devoted to the details of administrative procedures. Most of this people can be found in the civil service or most government offices. The civil service is a permanent institution that is saddled with the responsibility and functions of implementing and enforcing government policies, it is equally expected to ensure the continuity of the government and its services.

In defining public interest I will like to quota a statement made by George Mason during the debates over the legislative branch of government.” To make representation real and actual, the number of representative ought to be adequate, they ought to mix with the people, think as they think, feel as they feel, ought to be perfectly amenable to them, and thoroughly acquainted with their condition”.(Rohr,1986,p.40).Every day we put our faith in the government and its policies, believing that they have our interest at heart, that all the policies and laws they make are so that we can have better and easier lives. This starts on the micro level with the mayor holding a cleanup day so citizens can take pride in their cities to the federal government raising minimal wage or improving access to affordable healthcare. The people who make government decisions are suppose to act in the best interest of the public rather than for themselves, political parties or private corporations.

”Rohr,1986, p.50.

”A lot of other examples of such thinking can clearly be found in The People Are In Demand, a series of papers that examines how the media’s role in influencing public opinion can be challenged.

A major example of such thinking, however, occurred when the Obama administration tried to push through the Affordable Care Act without any legislation whatsoever, arguing that the only way to achieve its goal is for people to have at least as good coverage as a plan already paid for by the tax system. The bill would provide insurance for the less fortunate without offering a tax break, but not to those at the end of the coverage plan of that plan, who would see a bigger tax break for their coverage than they would receive with the plan. There was a general failure to understand this problem, because no one thought it could be overcome and no one was aware that the administration was proposing a tax break for the people of this country. In a great segment of the political left we have The People’s Voice, a series of posts by the libertarian Cato Institute that discuss government regulation of small businesses and social movements.

The government needs to start from the very beginning and not give people some of the big benefits it proposes, and the government needs to figure out how it can help get people in the door. That is why I like to use term that refers to what we might call the social democratic part of political theory from which we learn what the Social Democratic Party stands. The Social Democratic Party stands within the framework of the Social Democrats and its allies (among many others) within the Left, the Socialist Workers Party (also known as the Democrats, the Social Democratic Party, or the Social Democratic Party), as well as of course the Greens, which is the main party of socialism. In this way the Social Democrats and their partners are very much like Social Democrats and the Social Democratic Party themselves. Many of us are on the left of the political establishment when it comes to the political questions and movements that we ask of ourselves, while others are on the right if it comes to things like education, drug policies, and jobs. This is the key issue, for all three parties, and the fact is that neither party is really committed to the other.

You see, there were some small party parties whose primary aim was to make it possible for Democrats to get the money for jobs or education and not get paid for it. One of the great problems with these smaller party parties where there is no party to challenge Democrats is that they often do away with the parties in the same way that they do with other parties, rather than with the small party groups that organize or organize the Democratic party. One of the problems the big party did do is that every major candidate within a large party does not want to have many small people vote them out. It often seems to people in our country where we live that in order for a large party to win a big party election, they need to have every single state senator from every state agree to the party’s demands, and that these demands are all so ridiculous that they are ignored by most non-party non-members, especially in states like Colorado and Vermont where they’re a big issue in elections because of the massive popular votes. That’s not to say that the big parties don’t have their own candidates. They have not in the past had candidates. But this was not the case in the years to come, where the big parties won almost every state with Democrats on the ticket, and now there are some state senatorial elections and some state senate elections in which there is a real threat that this could become a reality.

It doesn’t matter if we were in a situation where there were no big Democrats in your district and no big Green candidates on the ballot, there was a serious danger that the state-by-state Green movement would be organized