Essay About Purpose Of This Paper Gender And Different Feminist Perspectives

Agender Comcepts
Join now to read essay Agender Comcepts
INTRODUCTION
DEFINTION OF KEY CONCEPTS
For the purpose of this paper gender will be defined as a social construction that is ever changing on a continuum of masculinity and femininity (CJ 654, 2005). Gender is something that individuals practice by acting certain ways established in gender roles (CJ 654, 2005). An example of these roles would be women as housewives, being dependent on the man, and being seen as helpless and in need of protection and men being out in the workforce, playing sports, and being tough. Discrimination will be defined as an action based on the stereotypes and prejudice of a certain group of people (Barak, 2001). Discrimination may occur at all levels of the criminal justice system including, police practices, court processing, sentencing, and conviction. Paternalism also needs to be defined when speaking to the issue of gender inequality. Paternalism refers to the “females need to be protected from their own good” (McShane and Williams, 1999: 251).

THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
When researchers wish to find out explanations of gender differences, especially when referring to inequality, they most often turn to theories of feminism to aid them in their discovery. For the purpose of this paper I will draw upon two different feminist perspectives: liberal and radical feminism. Throughout this paper, these perspectives should provide helpful insights as to why this inequality between genders exists. Further, they should become particularly relevant for explaining the idea of juvenile justice processing and sentencing.

Liberal Feminism
For liberal feminist the primary problem of gender is discrimination through gender inequality (CJ 654, 2005). Primarily the discrimination happens to females because gender roles are shaped by society and enacted in way to produce females as unequal to men (CJ 654, 2005). When women step outside their “gender boundaries”, sometimes they are criminalized in a way that men are not, specifically when exploring their sexuality. The liberal feminist perspective analyzes the notion of patriarchy, questions gender-based laws, and examines criminal justice processing for discriminatory and harmful practices (McShane and Williams, 1999). When considering the issue of gender differences in criminal justice processing such as sentencing, the liberal feminist perspective may be a way to help explain gender inequality.

Radical Feminism
For radical feminists the primary source of gender inequality is patriarchy through the subordination and sexual exploitation of women (CJ 654, 2005). Patriarchy is a way in which “men learn how to hold other human beings in contempt, to see the as nonhuman, and to control them” (Hurst, 2004: 84). In the criminal justice system, male police officers may hold true to this notion by criminalizing female sexual behavior, especially in regards to juvenile females and status offenses. “Once men dominate in areas outside the family and gain the economic and political resources attendant with those activities, they can use these resources to maintain patriarchy” (Hurst, 2004: 84). As it is common knowledge to the general population, men tend to dominate workplaces such as police departments, giving them the discretion and means to perpetuate the practice of patriarchy.

GENDER
To understand how the issue of gender inequality came to hold such a pivotal role in the criminal justice system, one must be aware of how these classes were created. This will be demonstrated by explaining the structural and institutional processes involved. It is also necessary to provide a brief overview of early gender inequalities in the criminal justice system.

Historical Context
Historically, women have been treated differently then men for as long as anyone can remember. These differences are rarely beneficial and mostly highly detrimental to womankind. Differences in the American criminal justice system are mostly seen during the height of the Progressive Era and perpetuated up until the present.

“The evolution of what might be called the ‘girl-saving’ effort was the direct consequence of a disturbing coalition between some feminists and other Progressive Era movements” (Chesney-Lind and Shelden, 2004: 167). Leaders and prominent women such as Susan B. Anthony led the brigade for conserving social purity among women and young girls (Chesney-Lind and Shelden, 2004). During this time women and girls were held as delinquent due to the nature of their sexuality and were criminalized by people with influential and political clout.

If young girls were deemed as delinquent, instead of