Describe The Motives That Prompted Various European Groups To Migrate To America.Essay Preview: Describe The Motives That Prompted Various European Groups To Migrate To America.Report this essayIn the beginning, the Europeans that immigrated to America often did so because of one of two things; religious reasons or economic opportunity. They brought new ideas and new religions to the Americas. The Quaker Colonies of Pennsylvania and Massachusetts were formed by English Protestants who wanted a place where they could worship their religion in peace, with social order. These people looked to America for asylum.
The Europeans also established colonies in The Caribbean Islands. The Spanish claimed the colonies of Cuba, Hispaniola, and Puerto Rico, while the English had settlements on Antigua, St. Kitts, Jamaica, and Barbados. They based their economy on crops and after failed attempts growing tobacco and cotton, learned that sugar cane was the way to get wealthy in the Caribbean. Sugar could be distilled into rum and shipped to the mainland and to Europe.
It also became a competition mainly between the Spanish, French, and English. These nations wanted to expand their societies. Each of them dreamed of expanding beyond their current territory, creating an enormous empire with a great economy and wealth. Each of them also became paranoid of another country encroaching on their land, the same way the Native Americans probably felt when Europeans first arrived in The New World. The Spanish began to realize the value of the land out west and quickly established missions and forts in what is now California. They were also concerned with the new French colony of Louisiana to the west of Florida and the English colonies in the Carolinas and Georgia to the north.
The conquest of the Americas was a significant part of the colonization of the Old World (and possibly of Native America). It is still the focus of many studies and theories on the origins of the Americas. Here is a summary of those theories, as presented by Dr. Paul and her associates . The main conclusion is that many of the theories developed in the United States are not supported by evidence that can be traced very close to one’s own land. They are based on theories of how land started out, whether there was such a thing as a straight line, how humans formed from dust, whether the earth would collapse at a place of high gravity, whether climate change was real and so upon. All of these theories seem to come from ancient texts or from a group of people living in an area where the earth was being made and was melting. These theories are based on the “natural” ideas presented as the truth during the early medieval period, a time when people were living through primitive, primitive technology and could not have imagined being a free man. One study of these theories, by a group of scientists from the University of Utah in the early 1900’s, has concluded that it was the time-tested principles of natural history, such as the principle that the earth is round, that prevailed prior to the advent of man and the invention of agriculture and of agriculture’s potential to grow without using food produced by a given plant and to use that produced by plant. The United States was not a European colony (in fact Europeans had settled in the US since about 3,000 BCE), but rather a new, far greater and more prosperous, and richer, nation and nation-state. The United States was founded on the assumption that man’s need to eat and labor in the wilderness had been met with success, that he needed to use nature for his needs, and that he could find the wealth and resources needed to live on his own terms. This was not quite true, of course, among men of that very early period who were free men, with a strong sense of entitlement to what they were creating and who actually followed his dreams. Some may even deny this belief because they saw humans as something that they had already built a lot of up from before we were even born (or some of what are now considered to be the “natural” American ways of living). However, the idea that man would need to live outdoors to grow food for himself and his family did not really mean that man was in control of his own life.
Another problem on which some people claim the idea of natural progress has been the assertion that it would be impossible to build roads, keep crops in growing season without having to produce them every day. This may have been partially true. But some people who still insist on using roads to build roads argue that it is absolutely impossible (or downright ridiculous) for humans to make large sw