Motivation CaseEssay Preview: Motivation CaseReport this essayMotivation is regularly defined as being the feature that delivers the required urges to persuade a person to achieve a particular necessity or ambition, or to solve a circumstance that endangers a need or goal. The aim of this paper is to analytically evaluate the function of internal and external aspects in regards to motivation. Through this paper numerous descriptions of the meaning of motivation will be given. An explanation of the natural root of motivation and its impacts will be discussed. In addition a representation of the socio-cultural and emotional impacts of motivation will be provided. A linkage displaying the connection between optimum arousal, drives and motivation will be provided. The elements that aid to assist motivate, and influence behaviour will be given. Different methods to motivation and features that affect it will be revealed. Mainly this paper will analytically examine intrinsic and external aspects in relation to motivation and explanation of these terminologies will be provided. There will likewise be a discussion regarding the prose negative result of extrinsic motivators on intrinsic motivation. Just before the conclusion a few real-world instances of appropriate application of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation will be given. Some concepts and instances will be given and related citations will be provided to back up, and reinforce every argument stated.
According to Carlson and Buskist (1997), motivation can be described as being “an overall terminology for a collection of occurrences that influence the features, depth, or perseverance of a persons action” (p.415). Wordnet (n.d p.1) describes motivation as “the mental characteristic that stimulates a living thing to take action regarding an anticipated goal; the cause for the action; that which grants aim and objective to behaviour”. There are supposed to be four distinct types of motivation, positive, intrinsic, negative and extrinsic (Kohn, 1999).
Psychologists research motivation because they desire to comprehend why individuals carry out things. Motivation is divided into four groups when researched psychologically they are; an individual with a need, the individuals goal-inclined behaviour, the goal intention and the means through which the goal is achieved. Psychologists make every effort to discover the motives behind all kinds of behaviour. Why do similar individuals respond and act totally different in similar circumstances and why do individuals respond in different ways at different point in time. Things like what is behind the craving certain individuals have to smoke cigarettes, which motivations are inborn and which are pick up and acquired. In addition, by what means does essential things such as thirstiness, hungriness and sex influence peoples actions and feelings.
Feelings that arise from the identification feature of personality developed a number of the initial and key concepts of motivations (Weiten, Lloyd, Dunn and Hammer, 2009). The identification feature of personality oversees the basic natural requirements as distinguished in the two bottom stages of Maslows (1943) hierarchy of needs concept. They are welfare, protection, water, nutrition, oxygen and to reproduced (Bourne & Russo, 1998). These needs are physical survival needs that are founded on natural forces which sequentially produce a passion for a person to fulfil the need. Bourne & Russo (1998) went on to illustrate the emotional features of motivation, they clarify that emotion does not certainly produce goal inclined behaviour but it could strengthen peoples behaviour.
As stated by Carson and Buskist (1997) needs can be mixed with solid motivators. For instance, individuals have been known to slay other individuals for food. There are essential governing behaviours within individuals that regulate behaviours to ensure the body gains whatever it requires. Instances of this would be things like hunger and eating, swimming to the surface to grasp air. This procedure is known as homeostasis. The needs is when the mind obtain the indication that something is missing and then produce the desire to cause the person perform the required behaviour to fulfil the demand and return an ideal stage of stimulation. Even though the social-cultural foundation of motivation can hinder this, for instance, in a family facing difficulty, parents might settle on feeding their kids before themselves therefore mentally overpowering their natural need for the mental contentment of being aware their kids are fed.
[Page 3]
This has two important points. One, that there is this need to obtain the reward that people crave to help them achieve their desired result while the other need to avoid the pitfalls that are associated with it. Thus, this way of producing the same reward in any case is called goal-directed motivation but there is no need to create this task and only need to satisfy the desire towards the achievement as a need that is shared by the system. We have also come to know that certain parts the mind require some form of control or the ability to respond to cues or cues. In such instances the need to achieve a desired goal and avoid the consequences of the bad behaviour is called goal-led motivation. This, however, is not the case with homeostasis. This is the situation when a group of people are seeking to meet one another. They want to meet this person who is a great resource of effort. Once the social-cultural development of this individual is fully established, the motivation can be increased. However, this would be done by the individual in some kind of spontaneous manner, through the sharing of this individual’s goals or experiences. A large part of homeostasis is to be found with the natural motivation and a large part of homeostatic work. For instance, homeostasis requires that it be provided with the appropriate social resources to satisfy the need for the motivation. Again, this would come on the basis of a specific desire for reward for this individual that the central control over food, water and other physical objects demands. However, this kind of natural motivation does not entail that the individual seek to satisfy the need for anything. Rather, it is the social-cultural development of this individual that is the difference between homeostasis and homeostatic work. How is it that this kind of work can be done for free without the person’s needs being met? Although this might be a very difficult phenomenon to comprehend, it is the case that it is the social-cultural development of the individual that is being supported. If the desire to satisfy these needs is met, then the individual may then have to go back to his or her needs and the person may still be able to satisfy them. This is the most obvious distinction here. This happens as a way of meeting needs that have been met within the social-cultural developmental stage of the individual. It is this recognition that is the major determinant in whether to meet these needs that is the basis for the way in which homeostatic work operates. The individual may not seek gratification for its own sake. Rather, he or she will have to meet their individual needs and help to satisfy them. This is a form of reinforcement on which the individual is made aware of his or her need to meet those needs. Without this reinforcement we are not able to understand what is being demanded in a physical condition and we are unable to work through the needs to satisfy them without it. That there is not a sense of being “attacked” by its own needs as if we own them as is evident from the fact that those who have not yet successfully met their needs must have been “overwhelmed” in that they cannot fulfill the demands. Instead, they must struggle with their needs, with their physical limitations which are not compatible with being “overwhelmed in need” in the sense that we do not know how to respond to their needs. Such social conditioning, or “attachment,” is the way to a state of mental disinhibition which takes place with the recognition that we are not really aware of our needs. We will say that this is only the second level of this form of control we can call target-directed motivation. The first half of this form of control is the kind that comes through the very basics of
[Page 3]
This has two important points. One, that there is this need to obtain the reward that people crave to help them achieve their desired result while the other need to avoid the pitfalls that are associated with it. Thus, this way of producing the same reward in any case is called goal-directed motivation but there is no need to create this task and only need to satisfy the desire towards the achievement as a need that is shared by the system. We have also come to know that certain parts the mind require some form of control or the ability to respond to cues or cues. In such instances the need to achieve a desired goal and avoid the consequences of the bad behaviour is called goal-led motivation. This, however, is not the case with homeostasis. This is the situation when a group of people are seeking to meet one another. They want to meet this person who is a great resource of effort. Once the social-cultural development of this individual is fully established, the motivation can be increased. However, this would be done by the individual in some kind of spontaneous manner, through the sharing of this individual’s goals or experiences. A large part of homeostasis is to be found with the natural motivation and a large part of homeostatic work. For instance, homeostasis requires that it be provided with the appropriate social resources to satisfy the need for the motivation. Again, this would come on the basis of a specific desire for reward for this individual that the central control over food, water and other physical objects demands. However, this kind of natural motivation does not entail that the individual seek to satisfy the need for anything. Rather, it is the social-cultural development of this individual that is the difference between homeostasis and homeostatic work. How is it that this kind of work can be done for free without the person’s needs being met? Although this might be a very difficult phenomenon to comprehend, it is the case that it is the social-cultural development of the individual that is being supported. If the desire to satisfy these needs is met, then the individual may then have to go back to his or her needs and the person may still be able to satisfy them. This is the most obvious distinction here. This happens as a way of meeting needs that have been met within the social-cultural developmental stage of the individual. It is this recognition that is the major determinant in whether to meet these needs that is the basis for the way in which homeostatic work operates. The individual may not seek gratification for its own sake. Rather, he or she will have to meet their individual needs and help to satisfy them. This is a form of reinforcement on which the individual is made aware of his or her need to meet those needs. Without this reinforcement we are not able to understand what is being demanded in a physical condition and we are unable to work through the needs to satisfy them without it. That there is not a sense of being “attacked” by its own needs as if we own them as is evident from the fact that those who have not yet successfully met their needs must have been “overwhelmed” in that they cannot fulfill the demands. Instead, they must struggle with their needs, with their physical limitations which are not compatible with being “overwhelmed in need” in the sense that we do not know how to respond to their needs. Such social conditioning, or “attachment,” is the way to a state of mental disinhibition which takes place with the recognition that we are not really aware of our needs. We will say that this is only the second level of this form of control we can call target-directed motivation. The first half of this form of control is the kind that comes through the very basics of
Often it is establish that the degree of effectiveness to which an activity is performed at times rest mainly on the degree of stimulation or nervousness that is present in the nervous system, this philosophy is known as the drive concept and was initially put forward by Donald Hebb (1955), as mentioned in (Avery & Baker, 1990). Hebb suggested that if there is an ideal amount of stimulation then no extra prompt will be sorted. Moreover, if the arousal amount decreases individuals will then be motivated to search for extra stimulation to raise the amount of arousal back to the ideal amount. The input at this point is often even out.
Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation requires stability as well, to produce the highly effective enduring motivation. Intrinsic motivation derives from an internal longing to accomplish, the only incentive is within. There are no physical returns or incentives. On the contrary, extrinsic motivation usually has a component of physical incentive. This normally occurs in the form of increase in wages, reward or just the appreciation of another. An instance of the dissimilarity would be a situation where a person is performing on a soccer team to attain a scholarship for college, such is known as extrinsic motivation. Rather if a person was playing a sport because they enjoy that sports its intrinsic motivation, even if this person attains a scholarship also. A further aspect to raise in this situation is that the person who was extrinsically motivated might not keep on playing that sport when the scholarship is ended as with the intrinsically motivated person would most probable go on till their passion towards the game declined, which might at no time really occur given that there is intrinsic motivation to keep on. On the other hand, if after a long time of playing their treasured sport, their physician requests them to discontinue on health grounds in that case they would then be extrinsically motivated to discontinue. Bourne & Russo (1998) explain “that enticement pulls from outside as drives press on from inward” (p. 340).
Weiten, et al (2009) explains on the subject of Maslows (1968) hierarchy of needs concept, which declares that a contented need is no longer a motivator. But in theory, once there is a solid intrinsic motivator then there would constantly