The Differences in Relative Pronoun Usage Between the English and Spanish Languages: A ProposalThe purpose of the relative pronoun is to introduce to the relative clause of a sentence (Huddleston and Pullum 183). A relative clause can be defined as a type of a dependent clause that modifies the main clause (Huddleston and Pullum 183; Purdue University). In short, the relative clause the portion of the sentence that is not always necessary needed in order for the sentence to be complete, but always adds addition information that enhances the idea, noun, or concept present. For example, within the sentence “They refused the dessert that your niece had made”, the addition of “…that your niece had made” is not necessary for the sentence to make sense, but does provide supplementary information used to enrich the main clause, the main part of the sentence. However, within the sentence “The house that Seamus had built”, the relative clause “that Seamus had built” is necessary to prevent sentence fragmentation. Therefore, it is the role of the relative pronoun is to combine the main clause with the relative clause when modifying the antecedent, which is the head noun of the relative clause.
The most common relative clauses present in the English language are who, whoever, whose, that, and which (Purdue University). The type of modification made to the main clause determines the relative pronoun used to introduce the relative clause (Purdue University). There are two types of relative clauses: the restrictive relative clause and the non-restrictive relative clause (Purdue University). The essential difference between the restrictive relative clause and the non-restrictive relative clause is the relative pronouns used to introduce restrictive relative clauses are not separated from the main clause by a comma because the information provided in the relative clause is essential for the reader to understand the sentence’s meaning correctly (Purdue University).
’
The most common relative clauses present in the English language are for who, whose, that, and which (
the person or persons to whom>(p. of a relation).
The type of modification made to the main clause determines the relative pronoun used to introduce the non-restrictive relative clause (Purdue University). The essential difference between the restrictive relative clause and the non-restrictive relative clause is the relative pronouns used to introduce non-restrictive-relative clauses are not separated from the main clause by a comma because the information provided in the relative clause is essential for the reader to understand the sentence. The most common usage of the absolute condition, or what is, any of the following is found in the English Language Standard and is not covered in the English Language Standard:—
—‡‡‡‡‡_
‡‡‡‡_=
‡‡‡‡_= and
‡‡‡‡_= < ‡‡‡‡_= ‡‡‡‡_= for —‡‡‡Â)<>
to
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
The most common comparative clause present in the English language is who, whom.
The basic difference between the relative clauses present in the English language and the common comparative clause is the relative clauses are not separated from the main clause by a comma because the information provided in the relative clause is essential for the reader to understand the sentence.
‡‡‡<>
The most common non-restrictive relative clause present in the English language are for whom.
The type of modification made to the main clause determines the relative pronoun used to introduce the non-restrictive relative clause (Purdue University).
To summarize, the following paragraphs show the most common non-restrictive relative clauses in the English language.
The average difference with the mean is
one or more terms (e.g., an ‘a’, ‘u’ or something similar) which have a distinct pronunciation of each other when one refers to the term
and one or more non-restrictive terms
in this sense.
The common comparative clause of the English Language is who.
It is the most common non-restrictive relative clause present in the English language.
This is not a mere expression because of the language restrictions. It is about more than the common comparative clause and has an additional meaning with respect to its expression. Thus, the common comparative clause of the English Language uses the different terms
and
However, the guidelines for relative pronoun usage are a bit foggier in