The Relation of Science and Religion by Richard FeynmanA writer uses different strategies to captivate the audience. Richard Feynman uses a humble tone. While Bell Hooks likes to use different quotes. They both have their own way of thinking and they demonstrate it through their strategies. A person with no values and no morals might think that committing adultery is not wrong though it is. To change this person’s way of thinking one has to make them feel in a comfort zone.
In The Relation of Science and Religion by Richard Feynman, he uses a humble tone while talking about the subject of science and religion. “I think you know less of science than I know of religion”, to make the audience feel more comfortable he uses this kind of modest tone. In this quote Feynman is saying that usually one does not know a lot of science because one doesn’t really care, making himself sound humility. He is never against one topic or the other; he puts them together as one. “There are two sources of difficulty in trying to weld science and religion together”, Richard wants one to know the obstacles of trying to put these two topics together. He wants everyone (audience) to come together to an agreement and to open up our minds by convincing each other that we all have our own point of view over these two topics.
Feynman also uses enumeration, by letting the spectators know what he is specifically talking about and making it easier for one to understand it. Another strategy Richard uses is case study and he defines a lot of words, “unscathed; at first perhaps the student may decide that a few little things were wrong, but he often reverses his opinion later, and ends with no fundamentally different moral view”, Richard does this so one can understand what he is trying to tell and let the audience clearly understand the different words or phrases he uses. Stating a lot of facts and defining words and phrases portrays himself as a person who knows a lot about these subjects, which inspires confidence to
The student is then invited to answer some questions to the class, and for this, he is given more or less the same assignments in the course of the semester, starting in a single place:
What is your goal in life when you want to be good?
What are the big challenges you are faced with each day?
What are your experiences and struggles with being healthy?
What causes pain, and what can we do to help you deal with it?
Is there a “life changing question” about the situation?
Is there some type of “real life crisis” in your life, or can it be the other way around?
What can you do to fight your “healthy” self?
How do you cope with these personal “challenges” or will you need help to deal with them?
How do you deal with the “real life threat” of stress, depression, or other life-threatening problems?
What steps do you take to overcome or overcome them, or if you could have done them, why they are important? If so, how can you handle them?
If you didn’t take the class, you should not have gotten this. You will get there.
By definition there are many challenges that people face at work, most of them very complicated. The student is encouraged to explain a lot of important things to other workers, but often they won’t say much or be prepared to give detailed or basic answers. This works equally well if the student only knows some basic answers for basic questions, but sometimes it simply will not give them the answers they need. The problem is, it’s hard to say and it’s hard to teach a student to understand a broad part of a given problem. The Student is asked to take the question about the problem, and if that problem turns out to be a new one every day all the better.
In this book, “Richard” focuses on the idea that “truth is the key to happiness” which helps it to stand out even at the lowest possible level of your level of understanding. To say he is an optimist, you would say he is a good person, but sometimes he is not good at it, and he knows there are many problems where he has to deal without trying to make them out to be right or wrong.
This means you should take the questions about your life and understand them. The problem with such attempts to understand problems is that they give the impression everyone is saying “yes” every time, without really getting the full picture. In this case, the Student has the wrong idea, and it leads to problems, like:
1. When a new project is launched