Essay About Robert A. Levy And Washington Times

Shakedown
Join now to read essay Shakedown
The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com
Washingtons extortion lobby
Published February 20, 2005
SHAKEDOWN: HOW CORPORATIONS, GOVERNMENT, AND TRIAL LAWYERS ABUSE THE
JUDICIAL PROCESS
By Robert A. Levy
Cato, 334 pages, $22.95
REVIEWED BY WILLIAM H. PETERSON
Worry over security played a big role in the presidential campaign — and plays it still. For persisting in
of D.C. is the naive if popular opinion that government is “on our side” — that it is an impartial protector
even seeing to it that we shall not want. Sure.
In “Shakedownю” Robert A. Levy, a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute, says su
opinion leaks. Our Framers were far above such leakiness. Thus did their constitutional checks and balan
to stem abuse of power. They knew that Brutus still lurks about, that as Thomas Jefferson noted in 1788,
natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.”
That gain is tracked by the author. He sees Washington, D.C.s leading industry as not tourism but spe
interests milking a giant, most cooperative cash cow, with consumers and taxpayers getting hit by many
“baseless lawsuits.”
Apart from antitrust, the extortion lobby works three routes: one, through victimizing smokers and a b
socked tobacco industry; two, through anti-gun advocates circumventing the Second Amendment and sta
legislatures by suing in court and in the process victimizing gun manufacturers and potential gun owners
three, through seductive tort liability and antitrust systems hobbling our economy via perverse “regulatio
through litigation.”
Mr. Levy titles part one of his two-part book “Tort Law as Litigation Tyranny” and part two “Antitrust
Corporate Welfare for Market Losers.” This libertarian pulls no punches.
But what about the rising tide of tort cases that push up, among other things, medical malpractice insu
premiums to six-figure heights and force many doctors, such as gynecologists and obstreticians, out of bu
Up go the costs of of office and hospital visits, hurting many family budgets.
The author supplies a neat reply. As a federalist as well as a libertarian, he believes in states rights, in
Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to t
States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
He adds, “There is no constitutional right to health care.” He sees state medical malpractice reform as
ubiquitous. He cites more than three dozen states with damage caps, with all 50 states passing or conside
some kind of malpractice reform.
Mr. Levy decries the fact that many congressional Republicans as well as liberal Democrats milk an ex
lobby. The author would invoke the 14th Amendment to check state tort laws which deny both procedura
2/22/2005
substantive protection against quasi-criminal punishment. He writes that “the federal government not onl
but must intervene. Otherwise,