Us Invasion Of Cambodia
Essay Preview: Us Invasion Of Cambodia
Report this essay
“The banyan tree grows throughout Cambodia. It may reach a height of over 100 feet, and as it grows, new roots descend from its branches, pushing into the ground and forming new trunks. The roots grow relentlessly; many of the ancient temples of Angkor have toppled as these roots have become embedded in the cracks and crevices between their massive stones. A single tree might have dozens of trunks, and it is often impossible to tell which is the original.
This is Cambodia today: a thousand intertwined branches, a thousand stories woven together, a thousand currents of history swirling in different directions. To understand Cambodia in the present, it is necessary to look at Cambodia in the past.”
This paper will begin by given a cursory overview of Cambodian history that sets the stage for the rule of Norodom Sihanouk, then, in more detail, specific events that happened between 1953 ( the date of Cambodian Independence from France) through 1973 when Sihanouk was overthrown in a coup. With the background set, I will then discuss the version of events as describe by William Blum in his work “Killing Hope.” It is my hope that an objective look can be given into the role that the United States played during the 1950’s, 60’s and early 70’s in Indochina and more specifically Cambodia.
History
The area that is present-day Cambodia came under Khmer rule about 600, when the region was at the center of a vast empire that stretched over most of Southeast Asia. Under the Khmers, who were Hindus, a magnificent temple complex was constructed at Angkor. Buddhism was introduced in the 12th century during the rule of Jayavaram VII. However, the kingdom, then known as Kambuja, fell into decline after Jayavarams reign and was nearly annihilated by Thai and Vietnamese invaders. Its power steadily diminished until 1863, when France colonized the region, joining Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam into a single protectorate known as French Indochina.
The French quickly usurped all but ceremonial powers from the monarch, Norodom. When he died in 1904, the French passed over his sons and handed the throne to his brother, Sisowath. Sisowath and his son ruled until 1941, when Norodom Sihanouk was elevated to power. Sihanouks coronation, along with the Japanese occupation during the war, worked to reinforce a sentiment among Cambodians that the region should be free from outside control. After World War II, Cambodians sought independence, but France was reluctant to part with its colony. Cambodia was granted independence within the French Union in 1949. But the French-Indochinese War provided an opportunity for Sihanouk to gain full military control of the country. In 1953, Cambodia managed to gain their independence in spite of World War II and the First Indochina War. Their independence was obtained through the political savvy of King Sihanouk. Wanting to be released from the pressures of the monarchy, Sihanouk abdicated the throne and became a full time politician.
He started a political faction called the Peoples Socialist Community (Sangkum Reastr Niyum) which then won by a landslide in the 1955 national elections.
In 1960, when his father died he was named head of state (up until then hed been the prime minister). Although he had remained neutral in a struggle between the US and USSR regarding tensions in Vietnam, he changed his position in 1965 and eliminated diplomatic relations with the US.
At the same time he allowed the Communist Vietnamese access to Cambodian soil to set up bases. With the Cambodian economy becoming unstable, Sihanouk decided to renew his relations with the US, who were secretly planning on bombing Cambodian areas suspected of housing Vietnamese Communists. While Sihanouk was abroad in 1970, he was ousted from power and fled to China.
Key Persons
The two key players in Cambodia during this time were the Cambodian Government, essential Sihanouk, and the U.S. government, with various presidents, advisors, military personnel and CIA representative all contributing to the U.S. communications. U.S. involvement started because of the ever expanding presence of Communism throughout Indochina. The dividing line came to be Vietnam, split into two, north and south, each “controlled” by either Communism or Democracy. As the battle raged in Vietnam, U.S. politicians and military advisors afraid of the “domino” effect saw the next struggle to be in Cambodia.
Blum Critique
After reading several of Blum’s explanations for U.S. interventions, it is quite clear that his position begins with an opposition to any U.S. intervention outside its borders. That being said, Blum provides an accurate account of events between 1955 and 1973 in Cambodia. He highlights Sihanouk and his influence to a point where other aspects of the situation are either ignored or brushed over.
Blum leaves out two areas that I feel are important, first is the misunderstood actions of Sihanouk in the eyes of a conservative 1950’s American culture and the extended role the