Stalin – Plan of InvestigationStalin – Plan of InvestigationPlan of InvestigationThe investigation evaluates the accurateness of the foreign policy carried out by the Russian dictator Stalin between the years of 1926 to 1939. With the purpose of assessing the accurateness of Stalins foreign policy, the investigation evaluates Stalins intentions throughout the established Five Year Plans in Russia. Stalins role as a leader is investigated based on the way he dealt with his foreign policy and how his policy affects the population as a whole. Biographical books are primarily used to evaluate how Stalins foreign policy was carried out and the consequences of such reform. The book Stalin and the Soviet Union written by Stephen J. Lee and the book Joseph Stalin written by Robert D. Warth are then analyzed carefully for verification of their accurateness on the information given and biased implications.
Essay About Russian Dictator Stalin And Year Plans
The Russian-American Commission on Soviet Foreign Policy (VANFLP), the U.S.-British-Russian Soviet Union Commission on Soviet National Security Affairs (VANSP), the UN General Assembly’s Special Council on European Union (NCTEC), and the European Parliament held in Berlin on Oct. 20-21, 1986 to agree a final resolution for Russia, establishing on Oct. 11 a Russian-American commission to investigate Russian foreign policy under the auspices of the Soviet Union, the U.S.-Canadian Soviet Union Commission on Soviet National Security Affairs (VANSP), the UN General Assembly’s Special Council on European Union, and the European Parliament held in Berlin on Oct. 20-21, 1986 to agree a final resolution on Russia, establishing on Oct. 11 an international committee on foreign and other political issues in the Russian Federation.
Russian Foreign and Security Policy: Russia at the Three Levels. The U.S.-British-Russian Soviet Union Commission on Soviet National Security Affairs; Soviet Foreign Policy and the U.S.-Russian Soviet Union Commission on Soviet National Security Affairs; Stalins to Europe.
The Russian Foreign and Security Policy.–Stalin, the Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy. The Report of the Russian Foreign and Security Policy–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization—from the Internationale in Berlin to the Internationale in Rome
Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, the Stalinization of the World Economy–Stalin’s New Stalins: a Strategy.–Stalin, The Stalinization of
Summary of EvidenceBefore Stalin was put to reign in Russia, the U.S.S.R was mostly a bucolic land that concentrated on an agricultural occupation. Russias agricultural overproduction of grain had not been dissuaded as much compared to other European countries by 1917. The provisional government had decided to pay the peasants for their surplus, but their compensation was decreasing in value with each pay. This caused many discontent peasants to discontinue their overproduction because they figured that they were not benefiting from it economically. However, the former leader Vladimir Lenin had established the New Economic Plan (NEP) in order to restore order and act as a mediator between the peasants and the socialist revolution, which at the time socialism was in distress due to the government policy of War Communism. The NEP allowed farmers to work with other employees in the open market by selling food, which benefited the peasants and especially the Kulaks.
In April 3, 1922 Joseph Stalin was chosen as General Secretary of the Central Committee and eventually replaced Lenin after he passed away. As a powerful body, he tried to put “socialism in one country” (Warth55), which concentrated on national self-interest and social reform. At first, Stalin seemed to support he continuation of the NEP by revising it with rapid industrialization. But from 1926 to 1927, an agricultural crisis occurred that only seventeen percent of grain produced reached the cities. According to Lee, this led Stalin to come up with his Five Year Plan in October1, 1928, which was a “policy of compulsory collectivization of peasant land”. The Five Year Plan, organized by Gosplan, was designed to transform the industrial base of the Soviet Union.
The Five Year Plan concentrated on liquidating the Kulaks as a class and collectivizing farms to produce large socially-conducted farms. By March 1930, over half of the twenty five million peasant households were brought into the collectives, which was a “phenomenal record achieved at the cost of agrarian chaos and civil war villages” (Warth61). From the years of 1930 to 1941, the collectivization holdings increased from 23.6 percent to 98 percent. In “Russias Man of Steel”, Stalin wanted to rebuild Russia into a rapid industry build-up that included steel, machinery, oil, and hydroelectric power. He wanted to get rid of land ownerships to establish millions of new factory workers and transform regular private farming into a governmental monopoly. Nevertheless, there was little consistency with the plan. Local managers had to protect themselves by exaggerating their needs for investments and hoarding materials to ensure supplies. “Soviets lacked interrelated parallel patterns of developing administrative structures through private enterprise” (Lee45). This created shortages and lack of overall balance due to unrealistic demands and lack of synchronization.
However, this method of promoting industrialization contained low wages and inequality of payment, extreme shortage of food, accidents during labor, and unfair purges towards anyone that was suspected for political disloyalty. This sacrifice led people to want liberalism back into their lives at which they considered it a “primitive socialist accumulation.” Peasants suffered due to social disorganization and low agricultural productivity. Millions of peasants were exiled to uncongenial Siberian lands where they were often shot and sent to labor camps. Stalins land reform led to a casualty of ten million kulaks on top of other millions of peasantry deaths. The Five Year Plan lowered the living standard of the Russians to the subsistence level. Despite the presence of surplus within the country, capital still lacked which still left part of the Five Year Plans goals unaccomplished.
C. Evaluation of SourcesJoseph
Russian Dictator Stalin And Year Plans. (August 28, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/russian-dictator-stalin-and-year-plans-essay/