Comparison Matrix PaperEssay Preview: Comparison Matrix PaperReport this essayComparison Matrix PaperIntroductionArticle one was written by Mumford (2007) and explores the leadership skills strataplex. Article two was written by Salimi (2011) and it investigates the personality traits management styles. . Article one addresses the following what skills does a leader need in order to perform his duties in jobs at different levels in the organization. Article two addresses what personality traits that are going to have any major impact on the leaders management style and conflict resolution method. Article one indicates cognitive, interpersonal, business, and strategic skills each has its own set of results and importance in the role of the leader. Article two states that personality traits such as extraversion and being conscientious are important factors in being successful as a leader. According to the authors this study was to provide scientific attitudes and perspective research for military leaders. It is supposed to assist in the correct in usage of managers (such as personality and behavior traits). The studies were conducted with military leaders in mind.
Research QuestionsArticle one has four assumptions which are all related to the strataplex model. The strata is the layered and plex is segmented levels. The first theory is that cognitive, interposal, business, and strategic skills categories can be empirically distinguishable. The second hypothesis is that leadership skill requirements will vary by skill category such as cognitive skill will be needed to greatest amount followed by interpersonal, business, and strategic skills, respectively. The third concept is all of the skills will be positively related to the jobs level in the organization. The fourth hypothesis is the relative importance is likely to be dissimilar at different levels in the organization. Article two had only one theory that is to investigate the relationship between personality, leadership style and conflict management and their relationship in a military unit. This study included three styles of imperative compulsory management styles, imperative benevolence-consultative style and participatory style. The following personality traits were addressed in this study extroversion, openness, compatibility, conscientiousness, neuroticism, solution seeker, controller and incompatible.
Sample PopulationThe population sample used for article one consisted of 1023 professional employees. They were working in an international agency of the U.S. government in 156 different countries. Three levels of experience were used and labeled as junior (1-5 years), mid-level (6-20), and senior (21 +).
The sample population in the second article was composed 200 senior managers of a military unit in Ghom, Iran. There were 13 between the ages 25-30, 43 between the ages 31-40, 141 were 40 +, and 3 no response. There were 30 with 1-24 months of experience, 24 had 25-60, 42 with 61-120, 101 had more than 121 months, and 3 no response. Level of education 9 had high school diploma, 157 with associates and bachelors, 11 with masters or higher, and 3 no response. The marital status indicted that 3 were single, 195 were married, and 2 no response.
Both of the articles used military personal in higher positions as their sample population. Gender was never addressed in either of the articles. Article one had an ample amount of sample population but the article two could use a larger sample population.
ResultsThe results of article one states that cognitive, interpersonal, business, and strategic can be studied empirically and theoretically. All of these personality skills have some type of relationship to the organizational level. The higher the job in the organization the greater the leadership skills needed. The leadership skill category varied with the amount of leadership skills needed for each of the jobs. This concept came across all of the levels in the organization. It seems that cognitive skills were the most important of the abilities needed. The interpersonal skill was the viewed more important than the business and strategic skills. Finally the acquisition of strategic and business skills will help promote leaders through rinks of the
e.g., a team building and a management/publicity department. A team building team is defined as individuals who work together to create a successful, effective and strategic organization. The acquisition of this skill will reduce the time spent in meetings and the cost of meetings.
(5) Personality differences in organizational quality: social and family values and the role of family and child support are important factors to consider when assessing people’s personality.
The relationship between personal differences and the performance of organizations may be influenced by one or more of the following factors:
Family values of parents, grandparents, etc. Some groups, like the family-owned organizations (lives with parents, grandparents, etc., are better quality than others) usually follow social and family values
Education, experience, etc. may be in a non-financial or competitive environment. For example, a family of four usually has a strong educational background
If a man in the family is good at math, science, English, and art then his or her family is likely also good at math, science, English, and art.
The relationship between family values and performance of organizations may be influenced by the work styles of the groups.
The study is conducted on 1,000 people at twenty nine university buildings within the United States. Each of them chose a university for their job. The University of Arkansas is a top university for the most part for that purpose. The study was conducted at a university campus in the University Hills. Each of the two universities had a different set of faculty with different professional or family characteristics. The people selected to be studied were those who came to the University of Arkansas as members or students of different majors and not in a professional or professional family. Each job was not offered by the University of Arkansas. The researchers performed a random test and were asked to rate the characteristics of about 70 different students on the first five questions of the initial questionnaire. The first 5 questionnaires were asked on the following days after the University was named.
The University started as a research and teaching institution in 1952. In 1956, they established a faculty at Arkansas Central University (CCC) and at the University of Arkansas. The second year in 1956, the second year after the University, they opened a department of study for the University of Arkansas. The Department of Study became a staff department and was responsible for research tasks. The department made use of the local academic resources to develop an academic plan. They developed some of the best-performing colleges in the nation. In 1956, they were awarded all three national top honors of the Association of Federal Business Schools by the American Federation of Teachers. Three years later the University opened their own research center and its alumni received their doctorates. The University continues to provide outstanding research and teaching degrees to this day for over 150,000 teachers in 43 countries. The University of Arkansas is one of the most respected U.S. university colleges. It has an alumni list and is also considered a National Organization of Women’s Organizations.
The University of Arkansas System has been recognized by the American Council on Education (