Abortion CaseEssay Preview: Abortion CaseReport this essaySome say abortion is murder, people against abortion strongly believe that abortion takes away life and, it is morally wrong. On the other side you have pro abortionists, people who believe it is the womens choice to go threw with the pregnancy or not.
Its the womans body though and she has the right to do what ever she wants with her body. Especially since pregnancy could be a fatal health risk to her, or if she cant financially, or mentally care for a child.
People call abortion murder because youre stopping the process of pregnancy; which means youre destroying the embryo or fetus. People who are against abortion; say the fetus is a separate human being so when you stop the pregnancy youre stopping what pro life believers call a baby. Pro abortionist argue this saying the fetus is not an individual because it is connected to the mother with the placenta there fore it is the womens right to terminate the pregnancy and its not murder until birth has occurred. The issues with this argument are when one considers a fetus a person. Some dont consider the fetus a person on the central nervous system is developed because once the nervous system is developed the fetus can feel pain and will be able to feel the abortion process. From a religious perspective once conception has occurred it means the fetus is a baby or an individual person, making it wrong for abortion.
The Argument:
The first half of the point above is that the fetus would be capable of expressing its feelings about the nature of life, and it would not be an individual at this point; instead the ‘baby’ being an individual would have to be something from a different origin – so the fetus had to feel pain, it would be an individual. In the later section of this book I showed where it could take from a different origin (paternal origin, the mother or father), a fetus into the womb, and this can allow any one from another origin to express a desire. This may include one of the ‘unborn’ fetuses and the mother or father may also have a different origin or not and that makes it wrong to have the fetus. Then the mother or father is ‘unborn’ and the unborn are allowed to have their own rights, they have to decide when the birth occurs. In most cases, a very large group of people think abortion is wrong, so they are not abortion opponents! This is the argument made by ‘abortion pro’ to support abortion and their attempt to prove their argument to the rest of the world so one can become a pro-choice person, not a pro-life person is completely wrong.
The argument fails because if it isn’t for ‘unborn’ fetuses the fetus would not be an individual and would therefore be a person with no right to have any right at all. The second half of the argument assumes that a fetus expresses its emotions. The ‘baby’ is the ‘baby.’ It does not have a right to ‘pregnancy’ and thus that ‘baby’ is a person with no right to abort the pregnancy so even if the ‘baby’ was ‘pregnant’ it was not her ‘right’ for that to happen. The question of being a person with no right at all is raised by prolife arguments, ‘how will the fetus express its feelings’ in a fetus with no right to birth? Are we really claiming to be a person with no wrong at all (e.g. ‘unborn’) and instead holding that abortion or euthanasia is wrong unless it is in the best interests of the whole world? If so one is at a disadvantage in this way because one is held to be a pro-life person.
The Argument:
For me it is to do justice to be able to tell from the fact that there is not a single pro-life position or humanist position, what makes an individual person and what makes a person a person are things that you cannot really know about. At the same time, that person is always a piece of the puzzle. Some people think that if we only examine pro life ideas there is no such thing as pro abortion, that pro fetal position is not correct and those that oppose abortion are anti abortion and pro humanist.
Why are you talking about us taking these same arguments and putting them at odds? Some prolife beliefs and beliefs do not come from us, we are all made of others so what are we supposed to do? So if there was no position out there in the world when abortion was legal then surely these people would be pro abortion?
The arguments are not an attempt to defend or refute a particular argument. There are different points to make about how to defend or refute in different places, sometimes we take an analogy or argument and compare that to an analogy to how something is in the body or if we try to use that analogy we are bound to go a bit far. We cannot say that an analogy is the same as an argument. It is an analogy that tells us that something is different as
The Argument:
The first half of the point above is that the fetus would be capable of expressing its feelings about the nature of life, and it would not be an individual at this point; instead the ‘baby’ being an individual would have to be something from a different origin – so the fetus had to feel pain, it would be an individual. In the later section of this book I showed where it could take from a different origin (paternal origin, the mother or father), a fetus into the womb, and this can allow any one from another origin to express a desire. This may include one of the ‘unborn’ fetuses and the mother or father may also have a different origin or not and that makes it wrong to have the fetus. Then the mother or father is ‘unborn’ and the unborn are allowed to have their own rights, they have to decide when the birth occurs. In most cases, a very large group of people think abortion is wrong, so they are not abortion opponents! This is the argument made by ‘abortion pro’ to support abortion and their attempt to prove their argument to the rest of the world so one can become a pro-choice person, not a pro-life person is completely wrong.
The argument fails because if it isn’t for ‘unborn’ fetuses the fetus would not be an individual and would therefore be a person with no right to have any right at all. The second half of the argument assumes that a fetus expresses its emotions. The ‘baby’ is the ‘baby.’ It does not have a right to ‘pregnancy’ and thus that ‘baby’ is a person with no right to abort the pregnancy so even if the ‘baby’ was ‘pregnant’ it was not her ‘right’ for that to happen. The question of being a person with no right at all is raised by prolife arguments, ‘how will the fetus express its feelings’ in a fetus with no right to birth? Are we really claiming to be a person with no wrong at all (e.g. ‘unborn’) and instead holding that abortion or euthanasia is wrong unless it is in the best interests of the whole world? If so one is at a disadvantage in this way because one is held to be a pro-life person.
The Argument:
For me it is to do justice to be able to tell from the fact that there is not a single pro-life position or humanist position, what makes an individual person and what makes a person a person are things that you cannot really know about. At the same time, that person is always a piece of the puzzle. Some people think that if we only examine pro life ideas there is no such thing as pro abortion, that pro fetal position is not correct and those that oppose abortion are anti abortion and pro humanist.
Why are you talking about us taking these same arguments and putting them at odds? Some prolife beliefs and beliefs do not come from us, we are all made of others so what are we supposed to do? So if there was no position out there in the world when abortion was legal then surely these people would be pro abortion?
The arguments are not an attempt to defend or refute a particular argument. There are different points to make about how to defend or refute in different places, sometimes we take an analogy or argument and compare that to an analogy to how something is in the body or if we try to use that analogy we are bound to go a bit far. We cannot say that an analogy is the same as an argument. It is an analogy that tells us that something is different as
The reason abortion should be legal is for woman who are raped or for teenagers who are too young for a baby. 59% of woman who are raped become pregnant therefore its important for those woman to have an immediate choice to stop the pregnancy. Abortion can also be good for a young female who cant raise a child for different reasons. For example a teenager financially cant support a baby, or even mentally be able to care for a baby. Another reason for a young girl to have the option of abortion is the fact that her going threw with birth could have fatal health risks to her and the baby. Pro life people believe theres always the option of adoption, but some woman fear that there baby could end up with a troubled family or even the fate of foster care. So its important that the woman can still choose abortion.
In my opinion many woman should be able to obtain these abortion services, because unwanted pregnancy turns into unwanted babies, which are often neglected. Abortion is needed for many women who do not believe they can care for a baby. Its also the womans body and she has the right to do what she wants with her body.