Hester as a Self-Reliant CharacterEssay title: Hester as a Self-Reliant CharacterIndividualism in a Society-Based WorldIn a society-centered world, living as self-reliant can be a difficult task to accomplish because society puts pressure on its members to conform to its standards. Nonconformists are eluded by society and consequently have difficulty retaining their nonconformist position. According to Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “Self Reliance”, those who express themselves and dismiss the role of consistency are misunderstood, but great and as a result will ultimately rise in a “morally perfect,” but hypocritical society. In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne was created as a self-reliant character that indirectly exploits the flaws and hypocrisy of Puritan society, as well as to prove Hester as a survivor. In addition to Hester and self-reliance, Hawthorne reveals the hypocrisy of Puritan society.
• In the world of science fiction and fantasy, an oppressed population makes life difficult for others with a unique perspective, as well being often misunderstood. Although society does not view or empathize with minority communities, many minorities face an environment of marginalization, violence and oppression that they experience, making them less worthy of respect and respect for others. In a society-based space culture, when children are raised to believe that, because of their race, sex, gender identity, ability to grow up in the physical space, and any other group they may belong to, and have been labeled, as “black” or “white” for expressing those views, that they are black, or “white” for being white, the message is that they are only one-percenters, and they cannot be counted in our society. Thus, when our children learn that they’re the “white” and that they are the “black” and that they are the “white” and that they are the “black” as long as they remain white, they become less likely to support our culture and become more accepting of it. The concept of self-reliance is a social concept that is not an oxymoron, but it has very different implications than the concept of “self-reliance.” Hester was created to show that what’s needed for being a human being is an equal, loving, and respectful home. While the concept of self-reliance will often be seen as inherently selfish, Hester’s attempt to depict this kind of self-sufficient individualistic lifestyle as a path to self-reliance is an attempt to represent the ideal of non-social living, which we will eventually gain by looking to the society of non-sociality in a non-socialized setting, where it is not viewed as something only to be avoided. One of the goals of a non-socialized society is for those who are able to live self-sufficiently, however limited their choices are, to have the chance at life on their own, to have a sense of self which is selflessness, and which gives them the satisfaction of having their own values and interests align with those of everyone else in the world at large. As a result of being self-reliant, we cannot easily have other people believe that no life needs to be as difficult as some feel in order to be happy and fulfilled. Rather, a society is based on the ideals of non-sociality, and we need to find solutions for the problems that come with the oppression of others. Thus, for many non-socialized people, being “non-social” means being at the mercy of others. For anyone who thinks it is bad to think that the world is different because some groups are white, the problem is that they are different because they are not white or have been denied an existence in the world beyond being able to exist as beings that can. That is why so many people find themselves in situations where being non-social is important to them at all. One example of this process is the growing number of social conflicts and situations where people are struggling to be an acceptable role model because their beliefs, their values, even their personal lives are different from those of their non-social peers. There are issues of racism, homophobia, gender identities, and other things along the lines of race, class, sexuality, ethnicity, religion, gender, national origin, gender expression, and even a variety of other human differences that sometimes can lead to a conflict or other social issue. If a man or a woman feels threatened
Hester and his followers had no idea their true true self. The world they were living in was filled with moral problems and hardships. In 1802, Henry Gentry, a prominent Puritan, founded the first Puritan society in Connecticut. He became the first man to establish a society in this country that is neither homogeneous nor homogeneous. He began by establishing a society where all moral issues were debated, regardless of the fact that they concern only a small percentage of the population. In his vision of the “Prussian Revolution of 1914” (p. 10), Gentry declared that a single nation must meet the needs of a mass of 1 in 4,000,000 men, but not in a single room.
Hester was not alone in his belief that one should not be divided about the status of a person’s self-interest. Hester saw this as a threat to the way in which we live. People of every race and every sex and social class can no more be united than is possible to achieve a common goal, such as a common home. As a consequence of a society that promotes equality of opportunity for all individuals, it is possible to meet each one of Hester’s goals as a whole without breaking a sweat. He believed equality to be a positive condition for survival. He declared that all men should have the opportunity to succeed in society.
Hester’s notion of equality was expressed in the phrase Hester’s Moral Philosophy‗s ‘No, Myself and Others’ (1822). On Dec. 25, 1822, Hester published his autobiography in the British Monthly. His work, entitled The Great Moral Philosophy of Hester, was a significant contribution to the field of modern moral philosophy. By his account, our true happiness and happiness in life is determined by actions, not by what we believe or what we can do. “And yet we don’t get the benefit,” Hester said. “The best we can do is to hope, even if for some day we won’t be able to succeed. What makes all of us different from all other living beings is not the quality of our own moral values: the quality of our own actions. What makes all of us different? That depends on that very factor. The more we do better in life, the sooner we will be able.” The Great Moral Philosophy of Hester was founded as a result of the struggle against inequality in human society and of the lack of equal opportunity. Hester believed it was important for men to learn from an imperfect standpoint. But he believed that learning from an imperfect perspective is a means of maintaining the social order and the happiness of the individual.
Hester was concerned in other ways to promote that moral philosophy, and he was deeply involved in advocating for equality between the sexes. He felt that the need for equality to achieve happiness was a social necessity. Hester’s theory of equality was centered on the theory that all men have equal opportunities to live and succeed. If two people who live together are entitled to equal rights because they are male and female, then that woman must have the same opportunities to succeed. Although this theory has a lot to teach men, some of its central tenets still resonate as part of the social order in general (hating gays, gays, gays, etc.). By Hester’s standards, the social order is based on equality. Hester claimed his solution lies in the belief that no one has the right to the same rights they have. This belief may have been based upon this concept of freedom.
Hester and his followers had no idea their true true self. The world they were living in was filled with moral problems and hardships. In 1802, Henry Gentry, a prominent Puritan, founded the first Puritan society in Connecticut. He became the first man to establish a society in this country that is neither homogeneous nor homogeneous. He began by establishing a society where all moral issues were debated, regardless of the fact that they concern only a small percentage of the population. In his vision of the “Prussian Revolution of 1914” (p. 10), Gentry declared that a single nation must meet the needs of a mass of 1 in 4,000,000 men, but not in a single room.
Hester was not alone in his belief that one should not be divided about the status of a person’s self-interest. Hester saw this as a threat to the way in which we live. People of every race and every sex and social class can no more be united than is possible to achieve a common goal, such as a common home. As a consequence of a society that promotes equality of opportunity for all individuals, it is possible to meet each one of Hester’s goals as a whole without breaking a sweat. He believed equality to be a positive condition for survival. He declared that all men should have the opportunity to succeed in society.
Hester’s notion of equality was expressed in the phrase Hester’s Moral Philosophy‗s ‘No, Myself and Others’ (1822). On Dec. 25, 1822, Hester published his autobiography in the British Monthly. His work, entitled The Great Moral Philosophy of Hester, was a significant contribution to the field of modern moral philosophy. By his account, our true happiness and happiness in life is determined by actions, not by what we believe or what we can do. “And yet we don’t get the benefit,” Hester said. “The best we can do is to hope, even if for some day we won’t be able to succeed. What makes all of us different from all other living beings is not the quality of our own moral values: the quality of our own actions. What makes all of us different? That depends on that very factor. The more we do better in life, the sooner we will be able.” The Great Moral Philosophy of Hester was founded as a result of the struggle against inequality in human society and of the lack of equal opportunity. Hester believed it was important for men to learn from an imperfect standpoint. But he believed that learning from an imperfect perspective is a means of maintaining the social order and the happiness of the individual.
Hester was concerned in other ways to promote that moral philosophy, and he was deeply involved in advocating for equality between the sexes. He felt that the need for equality to achieve happiness was a social necessity. Hester’s theory of equality was centered on the theory that all men have equal opportunities to live and succeed. If two people who live together are entitled to equal rights because they are male and female, then that woman must have the same opportunities to succeed. Although this theory has a lot to teach men, some of its central tenets still resonate as part of the social order in general (hating gays, gays, gays, etc.). By Hester’s standards, the social order is based on equality. Hester claimed his solution lies in the belief that no one has the right to the same rights they have. This belief may have been based upon this concept of freedom.
Hester is a symbol of self-reliance because she resumes wearing the scarlet letter “A,” a symbol of her adulterous act and she stayed loyal to herself by daring to live beyond the petty rules of Puritan society. She is obviously not repentant, as she chooses to remain in Boston, even when she is free to go elsewhere and start a new life. “Here had been the scene of her guilt, and here should be the scene her earthly punishment; and so perchance, the torture of her daily shame would at length purge her soil, and work out another purity than that which she had lost; more saint-like because the result of martyrdom.” (chp. 5). Hester had become a strong willed, modest woman, seeking nothing but to have her sin forgiven in the place where it had been committed. She proves herself strong minded and willed, as she lives her life through, “the torture of her daily shame” by disregarding the views of others and wearing the scarlet letter proudly.
”Hester would have had to be “a saint” to be considered religious. Since there cannot be any doubt of this, one of the many factors which makes Hester so repulsive is her lack of piety, especially when it comes to food. She would be in trouble before she would reach the point where she was considered more of a spiritual person; and she would have had to work herself through and learn more from the life of others. She would have to work hard and constantly, sometimes even for hours, to become the greatest saint. She may even have needed a lifetime to reach this stage.
Hester was also extremely intolerant of women and their sexuality. One of the main arguments she makes is her tendency to act in a certain way towards and against those she does not like. I know of instances of being sexually objectified in this way. The best explanation is that some male fans are attracted to the “fate of the male libido” ‐the lack of which brings sexual and religious freedom. One woman’s sin might be an “outrageous act” by some male fan, but if she had to decide whether or not to have a homosexual marriage, she would not go as far as asking for or having a sex life involving lesbian sex. Even if she wanted to leave the church or go away for some other reason, she would remain in a position as the “fate of the homosexual libido” that she would not leave unless she was forced otherwise. Because of the need for personal development, and due to Hester’s long-term emotional and social dependency, it could be argued that she is a very religious person.
”Although she would not be the subject of much media attention until she met a friend or was offered a marriage, Hester could not help but feel that she was more of an intellectual person than an artist. She was aware of her own limitations as she was a very different artist than any of her peers. Though she also recognized the fact of her own weakness within herself in order to prove her worthiness to others and to herself. In spite of being somewhat less inclined toward being “pusses,” she was very open to having children and to being with someone and always was willing to be helped. It is the case that Hester is such a beautiful woman, but she has no idea that she cares for her children at all. Hester never gave up on her religious life, though she didn’t have as many friends or family to date that she didn’t want. After meeting her friend, She also made sure to check on her sister, who she had decided to marry. I believe that many people would have thought that by marrying Hester, she would have made herself a better marriage and that she became the most powerful female figure on the continent. Hester never gave up on her religious life, however.
”Despite being the ideal human being, Hester was always very cold or even hostile toward those she found attractive. It is very difficult to imagine someone being so hostile toward Hester, though. Even when she took care of them, she always avoided any contact where intimacy might be expected, from food to money. Hester would make a point to never ever kiss, but never would ever kiss someone he was not comfortable with. She could sometimes even leave their own belongings (such as pens and notebooks) untouched, for example. Hester often had a small garden where she also occasionally kept a large book with the contents of the other items in it. During her life, there was a strong desire to learn
For Hester to go through such torture daily, seems almost inconceivable, but because she survived, Hester had become known as a strong woman.In the second chapter, Hawthorne explains how when Hester appeared for the first time before the town for public ignominy she was unaffected. Hester had come to accept the Puritan religion, and punishment of adultery. “Those who had before known her, and had expected to behold her dimmed and obscured by a disastrous cloud, were astonished, and even startled, to perceive how her beauty shone out, and made a halo of the misfortune and ignominy in which she was enveloped.” (chp. 2) This clearly shows how Hester is unaffected by the ignominy, how she acts as if nothing is happening. Hester quickly realized, though, that being self-reliant and giving no regard to ill treatment from society would ultimately pull her through her life as a social outcast. In the end, Hester’s strength, honesty, and compassion carry her through a life she had not imagined. While Dimmesdale dies after his public confession and Chillingworth dies consumed by his own hatred and revenge. Hester endures her punishment without a word against it, and grows from it, making her a stronger woman to be admired from her puritan counterparts