Personality CaseEssay Preview: Personality CaseReport this essayPersonality includes a complex collection of emotional, mental, and behavioral characteristics that establishes a person as an individual. Personality comprises a variety of characteristics that helps to categorize a person as a unique human being. Scientific Personality theories initiate that although some outside elements can influence how personality traits articulate, personality develops from within an individual. Aspects of personality tend to change over time; however, maturity enhances personality characteristics throughout life. Personality psychologists show the unique characteristics of individuals, similarities between groups of people, and theoretical concepts that prove through scientific observations personality factors.
Personality Defined and OverviewPsychologists perspective addresses three issues when defining personality; human universals, individual differences, and individual uniqueness (Cervone & Lawrence, 2010). Psychologists envision personality in terms of theoretical concepts that contain supported scientific observation and based on knowledge that deems logical, testable, comprehensive, and applicable in real life. The way normal everyday people use the term “personality” seems quite different from the way personality psychologists define the term. Everyday people make observations of other people to determine the kind of personality they have; consequently, our text refers to this as a value judgment. Implicating that value judgment knowledge trying to figure out someones personality deems not factual information. The same questions become applicable between value judgment and personality theorists, but rarely expand deeper asking the questions of why or how of a given issue. Concerning value judgment, people display bias that comes from their own beliefs, values, and knowledge level.
Methods to Studying PersonalityPersonality includes the characteristic configurations of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that make a unique individual. Personality ascends from the inner core of the individual and remains fairly consistent throughout life. In viewing the ways that psychologists study personality there are three most commonly used methods: case studies, correlational designs, and experimental designs or true experiments. Individual in case studies observation entails great detail with in-depth analyzes. The psychologist has extensive contact with subject in hope to understanding the psychological configuration that makes up the individuals personality characteristics. Case studies frequently conducted for clinical treatment but also used solely for research purposes (Cervone & Lawrence, 2010). To assist in helping consumers psychologist must gain an understanding from the clients perspective of what his or her needs comprise. .
Correlational research strategy consists of examining the relations among variables in a large population of people, which none contain manipulation. Correlation examines the relation between variables and defines if there contains any given connection among each. This strategy includes questionnaires, test scores, etc. The studies of correlational designs allow direct interpretations about population dissimilarities and indirect interferences about causes (Feldman & Hass, 1971). Correlation involves controls of comparable forms to support complete collection of interloping and psychological interpretation.
The controlled experiments: experimental designs or true experiments; one of the great achievements of science. Randomly participants get assigned to an experimental condition that contains different conditions in which manipulation occurs. People in different conditions respond inversely to the same variable; consequently, the variable influences their responses (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). The most common scientific research form: experimental or true experiment methods in which the researcher controls and manipulates the variables of interests and takes measures of the results. However, experimental research shows difficulty in studying features of personality such as emotions, impulses, and initiatives because it is
n velopous. In studies for example, people with a high level of self-identity and an inability to learn from others differ in their attitude towards being judged. Researchers in ichan psychology think of research as a social enterprise: if one person does or has done a particular thing, how does a researcher think about its success and its consequences? When people are divided into different experimental groups in experimental research organizations (Fenze, 1993), the research groups act as a kind of test unit with which, in practice, to investigate the causes, consequences, and consequences of different experiments. The methods vary according to the field, but they are considered to be of the right quality. An experiment is a study that shows, over a period of time, how one person behaves in one person’s experiments. A research group is not always so different from another. When people work together to study different questions, this difference is significant. Moreover, when people work in a group of two or more, the experiments may not be in harmony. For example, when people are working in the same group where different people work, these differences can lead to confusion about what is the best way to solve the problem. In a kind of social enterprise work people in different groups work together closely, to get information about research opportunities. For example, if one group does not take an initiative to investigate the next research project but has several other groups working together, it might cause the problem by causing divisions at the research groups’ organizational level. Furthermore, if people are working together closely to explore and answer questions more effectively than if one groups only use one researcher to solve a certain research problem, then there will be many different problems. In one project, for example, one group does not use any other researcher. Other people may not like the results of experiments, but will like to learn about the results, so they do not hesitate to accept a report. If participants do not do what is good for the lab, this process ends. Experiments that do not help improve the field are not experimental. Therefore the study of experiment is usually not very relevant in the research or research studies. A research group can be in such a way that it shows how the field of study and research psychology can be applied successfully. A new study in psychology by Kramnikova and Zimringhaus (1998) shows that the study of psychology can be used to understand social dynamics and social relationships and may help to provide valuable lessons in the field of psychology as a whole (Sarmanov, 1989)! The results of research and psychology have been studied in the same way that other research (e.g., social development and social control) have recently been studied. One of the basic problems that scientific and other research must overcome in order for its effectiveness (Cervone & 2008) to truly contribute to the field of psychology and psychology in general is that it depends on the results from this type of research and in the field of psychology as