The Art of WarEssay title: The Art of WarThe second book I read for my internship was The Art of War by Sun Tzu. The Art of War was written in early China as a guide for military strategy of the day. This text has stood the test of time and was used for centuries afterward as a guide for generals in warfare. In modern times the book has taken on a new role as its old lessons on military strategy and warfare are converted for use in the modern corporate business world. It is surprising how much value these lessons continue to hold thousands of years after they were originated. I read the text and over the course of my internship at Colliers International looked for examples of Sun Tzu’s strategy being incorporated into the workplace as well as examples of how integrating his tactics would lead to a more successful corporate structure.
There were several examples over the course of my internship where I was able to see Sun Tzu’s principles in action. One main example of this was my division’s attempt to expand its operations into Southern California. Colliers International, the company I interned for has an interesting corporate structure as it is not a single entity, but rather a compilation of over 20 companies under the Colliers heading. The Los Angeles area was considered a territory of a different company of the Colliers tree; however, my boss was intent on expanding the practices of his division, appraisal, into this area of the country. Needless to say, this situation was very delicate and required skillful planning and management to become successful. He used several Sun Tzu lessons to accomplish his goals.
He used the following Sun Tzu principal, “In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemys country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.” Mr. Paulus negotiated with the Los Angeles company and in the end secured the use of space in their offices to start his practice. By using their resources he significantly reduced his start-up costs which allowed him to divert the assets to strengthen other areas. This allowed him to increase the scope of the practice which would have taken him several years to attain on his own.
As Managing Director of business practice, Mr. Paulus seemed like an ideal model for comparing the modern businessman to Sun Tzu’s general. After careful observation I began to see correlations between the two. For example, Sun Tzu says, “He who can modify his tactics in relation to his opponent and thereby succeed in winning may be called a heaven-born captain.” I routinely saw Mr. Paulus looking for any possible angle to improve his business and build his client base. He would even come to me for advice on gaining an edge on his competition. This humbleness allows Mr. Paulus to operate much more efficiently and gain an advantage on opposition that does not value the opinions of all team members
This conclusion I also concluded that the relationship is not a straightforward one. The problem has to do with maintaining the confidence in the players. For a team to continue with their current performance, the players must maintain a more relaxed and analytical attitude, as shown by the previous study, as opposed to one that relies on the usual approach. It also has to do with whether the players will change their approach and decide right away this change is the right one. I suggest that this is the issue with Sun Tzu’s general management. He will make decisions based on what players feel can better the organization, so it isn’t a good game to use this theory as a base for deciding on changes to their team. The player will then have more faith that the new approach will be accepted, but it won’t be a good one to use against a player who is working on his or her own business interests.
Conclusion
While I was a long-time Sun Tzu disciple, it is difficult to know if Sun Tzu was the first Sun Buddhist to create his own version of business philosophy. There are many reasons why some may think they believe he was Sun Buddhist. These can be, among many, more important. When he comes up with the concept of “managing oneself”, his focus gets turned on himself, rather than on others. Sun Tzu’s method of thinking was influenced by a lot of Western political and social doctrines. Sun Tzu’s focus on himself and his beliefs are the exact opposites that he is. Sun Tzu’s business doctrine came from both men, the early Chinese and the Westerns. Sun Tzu was quite a man of many ideas. He understood that there could no longer be a monolithic system with the same hierarchy and rule. As such, he set himself up to maintain his own values, which he took on from his mentor and teacher Sun Tzu. This is why he thought of himself as “one of the most enlightened modern Chinese.” This would not surprise me if Sun Tzu, who was not Buddhist, began to have such a strong belief in himself as to believe he was Zen Buddhist only around the middle ages. It is also very interesting in that he was not even aware of the fact that Buddhism was also a tradition that he believed in. It is important to understand that in today’s modern society, many Sun Tzu texts are considered heresy. It could have been this or that Sun Tzu was not aware of the fact that Buddhism was a religion, which led to the formation of his philosophy, but to believe he was Zen Zen Buddhism.
In addition, his teachings, which come from various Sun Buddhism texts, make it apparent that there was not one single guru or master in Sun Tzu’s