Descartes- 2nd Meditation
Essay Preview: Descartes- 2nd Meditation
Report this essay
SECOND MEDITATION
At the beginning of the Second Meditation, Descartes is stuck in the middle of nothingness. As he regards everything that is around him to be false he has nothing to believe in. He considers what he has learnt to be false too and as his senses deceive him he cant trust them either. Everything that he has ever seen, learned or thought is now external from what he believes to be true and he is beginning his knowledge from non-existence. He feels like he is “in a whirlpool which tumbles me around so that I can neither stand on the bottom nor swim to the top.”(Second Meditation 24). Descartes is certain of one thing: nothing; because to be certain of nothing is still to be certain of something. As he is a rational thinker he rationalizes that nothing in the world is known. He decides to re-start his belief process and call everything he has ever believed in, into doubt.
Descartes reasons that as he is debating complex ideas in his head and doubting his existence in the world, he has to be certain. The fact that he is having these thoughts proves that he exists. Descartes then states with certainty “I am, I exist” (Second Meditation 25). This is the first accurate idea that Descartes is confident about.
Once Descartes recognizes the unquestionable truth that he exists, he then attempts to further his knowledge by discovering the type of thing he is. Trying to understand what he is, Descartes recalls Aristotles definition of a human as a rational animal. This is unsatisfactory since this requires investigating into the notions of rational and animal. Continuing his quest for identity, he recalls a more general view he previously had of his identity; he is composed of both body and soul. He cant refer to himself as a thing that has a body, though, since this involves sensory perception. He claims that attributes such as eating, movement, and sensation cant be part of the soul since this involves a body, which in turn, is based on the senses. Descartes continues examining other theories of human existence and attributes about himself that he can imagine and comes to a conclusion that thinking is the only attribute that he can justifiably claim. This is proven when he says, “”but what then am I? A thing that thinks. What is that? A thing that doubts, understands, affirms, deniesД (Second Meditation 28)
Through the Meditation, Descartes tries to say that “I” know not only that the mind exists, but also “I” know more about the mind than about the world outside the mind. This argument would only hold if every thought, perception and imagination told “me” something new about the mind. But all these thoughts tell “me” only one and the same thing: that “I” exist, and that “I” am a thing that thinks.