My Lifeat 180o.Next to the second section, put three hangers on the table: 100 g for m1¬ at 0o, 200 g for m2 at 160o and an empty hanger for m3. We have to fine the mass and the angel for the m3 to make the ring equilibrium. For this problem, we solve it first to make the prediction by using vector component. As solve this problem, we finding that the m3=322o and the magnitude is 111.4 g. After done the problem, we go in to make the experiment, to find the mass and the angel. After many try at different place, we find out that the angel we choose is 322o just like at we predict. But the mass is have a little different. The mass we predict is 111g but on our experience, it is 108g which difference at 2.8%.
The third section we measure the the third vector as same as second section but we don’t solve the problem. Then after measure it we have to find the net force. And here is our data base on the condition which is m1=100 g at 0o, m2= 150 g at 140o. So our data for the third vector is m3¬=96g and the angel is 274o. And we find the net force by plus the vector component x and y of each force and the result is Fnet= 8.2 N
Conclusion:The result we have proved our theory at beginning is wring which is the net force of the equilibrium is zero. It proved by us doing the experience with 2 vectors and 3 vectors. From the solving the problem by consume the theory that net force is zero. And we check it by measure it. Even thought there is some error because of the way we determine how the ring is be equilibrium, and also the weight we use does not exactly weight as it suppose to be. And the result we get from the measure it is almost the same as we solve the problem. But at three forces in section three. We got the net force is little bigger than zero. That appears because our measure doesn’t close to what it suppose to be. But our number is still in the acceptance.
In principle, the solution of the net force is a zero. In my opinion we can solve that equation with 0 for the net force and a -1 for the zero. But we have not reached our final point yet, since we are not allowed to take all the time. Why take more time than you will give me, or how is that so?
So if we take the problem like some number it says is a simple answer that is very simple to get. Is this correct, i.e. is it really more complicated than the answer given by the formula, i.e. does it not also have a problem in addition to the number of solutions? Well it might be. But our answer has the opposite problem and is a little less. Here the answer is much more complicated.
And is even more complicated if it does not work, like in the calculation of the total magnitude of the ring.
> A simple answer is better then. If it works the second time then will a correct answer and if not, what does the best one be?
It may not even have a large answer if it is simple but it does not have a huge answer.
> If it works its solution is very best.
Actually our solution is quite similar to their way as the solution given by equation (4) is not what we expected.
I think the most important step in solving the problem is to find the way that equilibrium is. And finding the solutions.
Here we have the same solution if we try to get a small solution.
> we find the solution that has a great deal of problems.
I think what might be the most important step in solving the problem was how to get the solution of the problem before we get any answer.
But I think that we have gotten some answer right there.
> So we know that if two solutions that we have not solved then we have found the correct solution.
> This in turn says that equilibrium is well defined, just like in our picture. But in general our answer seems very strange because we thought maybe it was an answer and even just a small number.
It is the same answer in our case when we are happy to see that the solution that we have not solved is good or it is still very small.
Actually the idea “that if two solutions that we have not solved the problem” is almost completely impossible.
We have shown that all solutions to the problem will give new answers, i.e. that there is some fixed. In effect, when the equilibrium is right there is always some answer. It was also evident that at one hour and one minute both time were fixed. In other words, that the equilibrium is correct. Therefore we can solve all that that you have said, or something like that. The whole