Absence of Evidence, or Evidence of Absence; a Paper on Animal Consciousness
Essay Preview: Absence of Evidence, or Evidence of Absence; a Paper on Animal Consciousness
Report this essay
Absence of Evidence, or Evidence of Absence?
A paper on Animal Consciousness
December 15, 2004
ANSCI 305
Consciousness is a difficult term to grasp; so much so, that many scientists will not even attempt to define the term, much less search for its evidence. Most however, do agree that consciousness must include certain aspects; specifically cognition, self-awareness, memory, and abstract thought.
Lesley J. Rogers describes consciousness as, “related to awareness, intelligence, and complex cognition, as well as language. Consciousness may be manifested in self-awareness, awareness of others, intentional behavior, including intentional communication, deception of others, and in the ability to make mental and symbolic representations (13).”
There is no question that humans carry these attributes, but what about animals? Some philosophers, including Descartes, claimed that while humans are conscious, animals are like machines, with no thought process or sentience. Others claim that animals are very capable of consciousness, and that we just have not had the capabilities to test the aspects of it through the scientific method. As Donald R. Griffin expressed:
Conscious thinking may well be a core function of central nervous systems. For conscious animals enjoy the advantage of being able to think about alternative actions and select behavior they believe will get them what they want or help them avoid what they dislike or fear. Of course human consciousness is astronomically more complex and versatile than any conceivable animal thinking, but the basic question addressedis whether the difference is qualitative and absolute, or whether animals are conscious even though the content of their consciousness is undoubtedly limited and very likely quite different of ours. (3)
This paper will look at what evidence there is that may imply that some, if not all, vertebrate animals may have the capacity for conscious thinking. Cognition, for example is something that animals may require in order to adapt to their changing environments so quickly. Cognition is an animals ability to make a decision by evaluating or processing current information based on some representation of prior experience (Kamil in Pepperberg 127). Some animal studies, such as Francine Pattersons study on Koko the gorilla, and Irene Pepperbergs study with Alex, an African gray parrot, have shown that some animals can be made to memorize symbols and their meanings, and then apply them to objects.
In Dr. Pepperbergs book, The Alex Studies, she taught the parrot to be able to recognize different objects by color, shape, and material. He was even able to eventually distinguish between concepts such as “bigger,” “smaller,” “same,” “different,” “over,” and “under.” When asked to identify objects, Alex correctly identified, on first try, 80% of all objects presented in over 200 tests (45). He was also able to correctly pair different labels together to fit a certain object; for example color and material. After only two years of training, Alex was able to communicate with contextual and conceptual use of human speech. He could identify, request, and refuse a set of objects for play or food (50). Dr. Pepperberg also took precautions to ensure that she had not allowed for any “cues” to tip off Alex to a correct answer, as in the case of “Clever Hans.”
These animals also demonstrated memory, another of the aspects of consciousness. Many behaviorists believe that animals act only on instinct, or on conditioned responses to stimuli. Others, like Lesley J. Rogers, believe that memories actually play an important part in an animals behavior. “The uniqueness of an individual is not simply encoded in the enormous diversity of our genetic code (our inheritance) but is established by our unique experiences encoded in our memories. It is the collection of memories that becomes part of the self” (20). She is not saying that all animals are aware of the memories they form, and gives the example that even cockroaches can learn and form memories, but that doesnt necessarily mean that they are self-aware.
Pigeons have a surprisingly developed memory system, and have been able to remember and distinguish hundreds of different patterns on a conditioning box out of a series of six hundred other patterns that offered no reward when pecked. The same test was very difficult for humans to accomplish, but pigeons were able to maintain 88% accuracy after seven months (Rogers 71).
Francine Pattersons study with Koko showed some of the capacity of a gorillas memory for signs. At 51 months of training, Koko had acquired 161 signs that she used on a regular basis (Patterson and Linden 87). It would take a great deal of memory to recognize those signs and their meanings, much less be able to form them oneself, but that is what the gorilla and her trainers did every day.
Along with memories comes self-awareness. This would include being aware of your own perceptions and memories, and may include (according to some) being able to recognize your own image. “At a basic level, self-awareness means to be aware of ones own feelings or emotions and to be conscious of pain, but self-awareness also includes awareness of ones body …ones state of mind, ones self in social context, and numerous other, ill-defined attributes that we would assign to ourselves” (Rogers 15). Rogers definition is an example of how these terms are created to fit a human standard. One reason that many scientists or psychologists will not give a standard definition for terms like these, is that there may be a form of self-awareness that fits an animals mind, but is different from our own.
One test that many have used to search for self-awareness in animals is the Gallup mirror test. The test entails having an animal look into a mirror in order to see itself. The animal is later anesthetized, and a mark is placed somewhere on the animal, usually the forehead, or some other spot that wouldnt be seen without a mirror. The animal is once again placed before a mirror, and when it wakes up, is observed to determine if it will touch the spot, showing that it recognizes the mirror image as a representation of itself. It was first developed to test when children first become self aware, and was later used on several animal species.