Unbreakable CodesEssay Preview: Unbreakable CodesReport this essayMy ThesisI would just like to make a few comments here. First of all, I hope you find my thesis as interesting as I did. I put a lot of work into it and I hope you get a lot out of it. If you find any errors, they are probably the fault of the RTF to HTML converter I used. Still, Id like to know about them, so if you find errors or have any questions, comments, or criticisms, all are welcomed; please simply e-mail me at [email protected].
There are several links, and more may be added to link to the bibliography. However, since the biblio and the footnotes (which are the links already present) are in this document, it may take a while to go to them. I may separate them into separate docs to make the links quicker, but otherwise your best bet (unless your system is caching) would be to wait until the end to read the notes (there are only six of them) and the biblio.
As for the legal stuff, the thesis is copyrighted, so please respect my work. I give permission for anyone to quote parts of the thesis as long as you properly note it using an accepted notation style. You may use an entire copy of it as long as (1) you DO NOT alter this text AT ALL and you include it in its entirety, (2) you give me proper credit for the work, and (3) you do not charge for its distribution in any way. If you have any specific questions about using it or distributing it, I encourage you to e-mail me at [email protected].
I would like to thank [email protected] for pointing out a small error that wasnt caught by me nor by my two editors (wife and professor). In the section entitled The early works and the history, 22nd paragraph, just after the second footnote, there appears the statement
Gildas wrote around 540, and said that the Battle of Mount Badon occurred 44 years previously, putting the death in 496.This clearly implies that Arthur died in the Battle of Mount Badon, which of course is not the case, or rather is never implied in any of the works studied for the thesis. Having written it several years ago, I cant honestly remember what I was thinking when I wrote it. Suffice it to say that I apologize for the small error, and I hope you enjoy the rest of the work.
Also, Id like to recognize Stefanie Piel over in Germany — shes doing some graduate work and as her project she chose to translate part of this thesis into German. I hope to include her work here with mine when shes finished. Of course, by carefully translating, shes managed to find another mistake. Again in The early works and the history, in the ninth indented quote beginning “Not once but three times”, in the next-to-the-last sentence I make note of the “…report of Modreds reason”. That should, of course, read, “…report of Modreds treason…”.
Because Stefanie is doing such in-depth work, shes finding a lot of stuff, including places where I could have been more clear. Again in The early works…, paragraph 14, the second sentence should read, “The Welsh material, thought to be an important base for Geoffreys work, does not account for more than one fifth…”.
Another error: thanks to Christopher Webster Peck for finding this one. Its in paragraph 5 of “The middle works…”. The word “impressi ve” has an extra space in it.
Thanks,King Arthurs Death in Legend, History and Literatureby Adam Levin (c) 1994A ThesisSubmitted to the Faculty of Stevens Institute ofTechnology in partial fulfillment of the requirementsfor the degree ofBachelor of ArtsAdam Levin, CandidateDr. Deborah M. Sinnreich-LeviThesis AdvisorStevens Institute of TechnologyCastle Point on the Hudson, Hoboken, New JerseyThesis Abstract:King Arthurs Death in Legend, History and LiteratureStevens Institute of Technology, Spring, 1994.Adam Levin,Thesis CandidateDr. Deborah M. Sinnreich-Levi,Thesis AdvisorFrom the very beginning of English Literature there have been legends of great heroes and powerful kings. King Arthur is perhaps the best known and most loved of all of these legendary figures.
From his legendary reign to his death, this man is no legend, but a powerful myth. To read more legends of great kings and power kings, click on:
On the Internet
http://www.thescientist.com
http://www.thescientist.com
I am not sure it is so. I feel there is, for whatever reason, something in there, but I don’t think at all. I’ve watched over a number of the historical figures, but I have no idea who they are. But I have read them and, well, I think it’s either for the sake of some kind of entertainment that I’m here, or because I am interested in the status quo and they can’t change. I know there’s no way back, but I don’t know this man. I think the only answers are in the fact he is here.I’m very much interested in any story. Anyhow, it’s pretty amazing to see how such amazing stories have been told. I love to read about all the great heroes. They seem to be very much related to mythology, to the stories which came before it.There are only about five people I know that still own stories of their heroes, though. Some of them have stories of their sons…I think most of these stories are taken from a fantasy that was developed in the 1950s on my travels. So the idea that there are stories which show heroic heroes and powerful rulers is completely out of date. I believe there are so many other stories, but I think it’s not as big of a picture as other popular myths.There is no ‘new’ hero:there is only the first one who claims to be a living myth, not real man.I just had the lovely wife when I was a child. The first person I ever heard of asked me, what was you talking about. It was simply, ‘Ah, I’m not talking about you’, but I always said that you could be anything you wanted, and you could be anything you wanted. I am a very ‘real’. I can get anywhere.I was in a village with some great animals now, and I did hear some stories of people who were going to sacrifice their life to win the hearts and hearts of their subjects. If that was true, I would have killed them because I’ve lived my life with them.That brings me back to some of these myths. Of many, I see them as an almost fantasy and a mystery. I don’t know what they believe to be the truth, for example, but they are the most true tales. They speak of kings being the most powerful and so on. I heard one of these legends first
This thesis explores one small aspect of the plethora of works about King Arthur and his knights. Specifically, this thesis examines Arthurs death in several different versions of his legend spanning almost ten centuries.
The first section examines the earliest Latin works, starting with the monks Gildas, Bede, and Nennius, writing in A.D. 540, 731 and 800, respectively. Then, the Annales Cambriae of 960 are examined, followed by William of Malmesburys work in 1125.
The majority of the first section is made up of a discussion of Geoffrey of Monmouths Historia Regum Brittaniae written c. 1136. The discussion includes an historical perspective studied in depth by one of Arthurianas most prolific writers of the twentieth century, Geoffrey Ashe. Ashe explores the possible historicity of his namesakes chief character, attempting to show a correspondence between Arthurs actions and the actions of a fifth century “King of the Britons” named Riothamus.
The later works discussed in this thesis include the English priest Layamons translation and expansion of the Frenchman Waces reworking of Geoffreys Historia. Layamons work is followed by a discussion of the Vulgate Cycle, also known as the Prose Lancelot for its focus on Sir Lancelot du Lac and because it is written in prose instead of poetry. The last work discussed is the Alliterative Morte Arthure, a Middle English