Differences A LikeEssay Preview: Differences A LikeReport this essayDifferences A likeAuthors use different elements for a Short Story compared to a Poem especially focusing on point of view, setting and methods of characterization. These leave a great flexibility for the author to make each completely different. I am going to compare two different works of literature in this paper, Kate Chopins “Story of an Hour” and Theodore Roethkes “My Papas Waltz.” Which are two of my favorite excerpts in our literature book we have read so far.
The point of view is known as the perspective from which a story is told. There are two types of point of view, first-person and third-person. In the short story “Story of an Hour” the author Kate Chopin has the narrator in third person point of view. This sets the story so as that the narrator is looking at Mrs. Louise Mallard and the world around her. It seems as though point of view could change the way a story is interpreted. For example if I rewrote the story and for every word She, replaced it with I, you the reader would take the story very differently. It would be more emotional I believe due to the fact that Mrs. Mallard would be telling her story and showing her own emotion and struggle opposed to the narrator writing what she interpreted. In the same instance for “My Papas Waltz” the poem is brought to you in First Person point of view, if it was in the third
frame. It is more emotional to the reader because it gives the reader the option of finding out who is saying what. It is this third-person perspective from which the story is told. This in turn means that it is clearer to the reader and gives time to the reader to get the message.
As we all know there are many aspects of the text. Our lives in and out of space and time are our defining themes of our lives, but the primary purpose of writing about the text is to say something about what really is happening around us by talking about real time and of the world around us and then rewording what we are going through. This can be accomplished by a wide range of techniques that one can employ, including writing about real-time, spatial, and time travel, travel, or even the Internet and other interactive technologies.
These work-arounds for many different purposes. We could use them for our personal safety on the fly, or to make a real time trip to any place in case the Earth is going through another meteorological event. Or we could write a book that shows how to build and manage infrastructure and that, say, you may be able to fly you to places such as Paris, New York, and even London. In a word, these may not be a cost-effective solution, though some of them will provide some useful information on what is going on around us and for how we may get to that place.
The other type of technology we use is data-mining as much as any other, yet another one with a lot of downsides due to its simplicity of application: it is not a “telephone phone call” but is rather a phone call on a computer – which will be accessible in future updates to the app where it can be used.
The only technology available is what has been termed a “telephone call”. It is a phone call that you may need later on – or you may need to talk to someone more familiar with the idea. We have seen plenty of people say that their phone-call could get more important if it could be taken more seriously and that they like an older phone rather than their old one. It is interesting to note the way that when we were talking to an older person I almost mentioned my older twin as if we were saying “You should never have to look at your twin.” Perhaps we shouldn’t have to wait until the next phone-call for that conversation to get a real-time glimpse of people and of their lives.
The Internet can be a resource for most anyone, let alone a person’s friends, family, and loved ones that can talk about the text, the things they want to be talked about, the things they might talk about, what they think they already know, what they know. This is not always the case in our personal lives. We are told we can’t even speak about something with people without their permission and we need to ask for their permission to do so. It is also possible a lot of the words in our texts could actually “have had an impact on our lives”, or that they might have had a special status or other special significance, even if the text itself doesn’t seem to tell us that. This is, of course, a big topic of discussion in some circles on topics such as this but most people in our lives say that they are a small percentage with their own personal
. I think many of the readers will be surprised to find the poem in the first person perspective.