Smart Guns; Are They Dumb Technology?
Essay Preview: Smart Guns; Are They Dumb Technology?
Report this essay
Smart Guns 1
Running Head: Smart Guns
Smart Guns; Are They Dumb Technology?
A look at the technology of smart guns and an
examination of their potential effects on society.
William Shipman
UI 319-01
March 15, 2006
Smart Guns 2
Smart Guns; Are They Dumb Technology?
Everybody has felt the gut wrenching emotion induced by news stories of children being shot. Whether suicide, accidental shooting, or school shooting these are tragedies that touch nearly everyone. This paper will examine a technology that many believe has the potential to drastically reduce incidents like the ones previously mentioned. This technology is popularly referred to as smart gun technology. Smart guns or personalized guns are guns designed to be fired only by the guns owner. As such the gun would be useless in the hands children.
The Need for a Smart Gun
According to FBI statistics in 2005 twenty percent of cops shot in the line of duty were shot with their own gun, and there were twenty-four deaths resulting from school shootings (
As stated in the introduction, a smart gun can only be operated by its legal owner, therefore they may reduce the likelihood of firearm injuries to young children and law enforcement officers. Police armed with a smart gun could never be shot by a criminal who had managed to wrestle their
Smart Guns 3
gun away from them. Since children cannot legally purchase
firearms they would not be able to accidentally discharge them or use them in school shootings. Firearms that were stolen would be useless.
How Smart Guns Operate
There are a number of technologies in existence that can be used to personalize guns. The simplest of these technologies are variations on the mechanical locks that are already in existence. Some of these smart locks require the owner to type in a code on a keypad to unlock the device, others use a fingerprint scanner to unlock the device.
The fingerprint scanner and keypad have also been integrated into the firearm instead of being located on a removable locking device. Americas largest gun manufacturer, Smith & Wesson, has developed a prototype which only allows the magazine to be inserted after it has verified the owners thumbprint (
Other technology that is currently being tested requires the gun owner to wear a ring, wristband, or watch which activates a computer within the gun allowing it to fire. Colt currently has a prototype which uses a ring or
Smart Guns 4
bracelet that emits a radio signal which activates the gun (“Smart guns,” 1996). Another manufacture, Fulton Arms, has taken a slightly different approach. The Fulton Arms weapon uses a ring which contains a magnet. The gun will only respond if a magnet with precisely the right strength is within one half inch of the gun.
More sophisticated technology which does not require the owner to wear any special device or do anything but pick the weapon up and fire it is many years away. The New Jersey Institute of Technology says that such a gun could recognize the owner in several ways, including fingerprint, and voice, as well as patterns of bones, arteries, and veins in the hand (
Shortcomings of Smart Guns
At first thought it seems like a great idea. A gun that can determine if the person holding it is an authorized user. Homeowners want it because it eliminates the danger of their kids or anyone else using it. The cops surely want it, because it eliminates the danger of a bad guy getting hold of their weapon and turning the tables. Whats not to like?
The biggest drawback comes as a result of integrating computers and guns. Besides being very complicated, this is quite expensive. The expense in developing these guns
Smart Guns 5
translates