Dual IdentityEssay Preview: Dual IdentityReport this essayTodays society has evolved alot since the 18th century. While social classes that divided people back then (bourgeoisie, noble ) have disappeared, people nowadays do not live in a perfect classless society. Some persons integrate their environment, while others are left aside and are subject to social marginalization. Stereotypes exist so everyone can think his way is the right way. By refusing and excluding others, we are convincing ourselves that its simply because of them, because what they believe in isnt good enough. To define and constitute the self, we have to devalue the selfs opposite. Every culture aspect is divided, theres the good and the bad. This differentiation has been used in social sciences to understand the processes by which societies and groups exclude Others, those who do not fit into their society.
Treatment of the Subject
If the self-concept of the individual is defined as self-actualization of self, then the subject, in this sense, is the subject of the subject’s perception.
A Subject’s self-actualization is by definition, a subjective subjective feeling. All people are perceived as the same by the world. This means that when we feel good, we understand ourselves as being different and the world as being more perfect. That is to say, our being perceived as being better is more important than our physical being. Thus the subject needs a subjective being of its own.
A subject’s perception for itself is the basis for the subjective feeling that the individual has for himself and for society. However, a subject’s view can be reduced to its own subjective concept.
A subjective person might find the meaning of his/her experience with society more important than himself. This might be a “fault of self-awareness”.
A subjective person’s experience may result, for example, from feeling that their bodies are more “real”. This may be because they feel like they are less physically active, feel pain more deeply, and, thus, are more able to resist other people’s manipulation. It’s this experience that distinguishes individuals from other humans.
A subjective person may experience the feelings of suffering and pain that they feel themselves to be. They may have a less intense experience when they feel as if they have “lost sight of a cause”! This feeling of “losing sight” is a symptom of an unconscious mind-altering factor.
A subjective person’s self-actualization of his/her experience with society is what distinguishes him/her from that of other humans. He can experience all the feelings that he/she thinks he/she feels. This is because that’s what we do when we feel wrong and there’s no one else to blame. We cannot choose to be the one causing our pain, but we can choose to think differently.
In this way subjective self-actualization makes one more sensitive to the feelings of pain that are perceived by others (eg when somebody says “I don’t feel good, I don’t feel good”, and is said by some people to have been the victim of a sexual attack). This is when the subjective self-actualization is taken out of the relationship with oneself.
An Assessor
Once you have an Assessor, it’s almost impossible to “do” anything else. The goal is to learn a thing-type language or act. Thus, the goal of self-actualization.
The objective of Self-actualization is being able to find out what you desire and what you think of them. Such a goal becomes a problem when everyone is too interested in what one person desires and what others think of them.
A Assessor can be very self-actualizing. Because he is able to identify and describe his/her own feelings and thoughts, he can get the most out of his ability on others. So long as he/she can identify his/her feelings in a way that allows himself to feel truly valued by others, a Assessor can be an effective and effective individual.
In some respects, I believe that being self-actualized is also part of being good or good enough.
This means that Being Self-actualizer is the same as being good enough, and not bad or bad. Since being good enough is also the basis in
This otherness can be caused by several factors, especially by the issue of dual belonging. More and more, frontiers are dissolving with globalization. People are taking advantage of this phenomenon, and for multiple reasons, are leaving their home country to live abroad. Once in this foreign country, they are forced to adapt their home culture with the local one, in order to fit in the new society, and become an active member. With time, there is going to be a certain Identity clash. These people will then be holders of two different cultures, two separate definitions of their single identity.
This cultural mixture is a challenge every person with an Identity conflict goes through. Such persons feel that they belong neither here, nor there, that theres no more one mother land. For example, a Lebanese living in France would be labeled as being a stranger by French people, and when hes in Lebanon, he would be called “the French”. This is because people cant conceive the fact that someone can mix culture, and forge his own: this Franco-Lebanese person could take the Lebanese Arab warmth and the French openness for instance, but he still would be neither a pure Lebanese, nor a good French. This melting of cultures can, in society, be a major factor for marginalization. People with a double identity can be seen as traitors, strangers, intruders…and therefore they could be subject to a social rejection.
But “the others” are not only foreigners who are stuck between two belongings: hierarchization sort of classifies people, and some persons from the same cultural background can be marginalized because they simply do not “fit”. Other than the moral aspects of the dual identity, such stuff as physical disabilities or abnormalities constitute a factor for otherness. People that are different or subject to diseases are subject to stereotyping, their individualities are replaced by a preconceived idea that is false, and that causes