Homophobia At WorkEssay Preview: Homophobia At WorkReport this essayProblem Identification“The social organization of work is the set of relations among people at work” and within any organization, gay and lesbian people account for approximately 10 percent of the workforce (Hodson & Sullivan, 2002, p. 4). “Unlike most other minority groups, however, homosexuals are not readily visible, and many have chosen to remain invisible, especially at work, because they fear the negative consequences that might result from revealing their sexual orientation” (Hunt, 1995, p. 149). For gays and lesbians coming out is not worth risking exclusion, career damage, or even being the butt of jokes and anti-gay remarks. Along with this fear there are also the added obstacles of homophobia in the workplace, which most managers and human resource professionals know little about. The reason that they know little is because gay and lesbian people, as well as most forms of discrimination against them, are invisible. It is this invisibility, which is at the heart of the problem, and which causes most managers to assume that sexual orientation is not an issue in their organization.
“Homophobia – irrational fear and hatred of gay people – underlies a spectrum of emotions and misconceptions that are destructive in the workplace and in society at large” (Winfield & Spielman, 1995, p. 17). It is this homophobia that can cause gay and lesbian people to have difficulty adapting to the workplace culture. Regrettably, homophobia appears to be the result of stereotypes and prejudices and according to Norma Carr-Ruffino some reasons given for prejudice against gay and lesbian persons include:
I believe in traditional gender and sex roles,I fee uncomfortable with gay persons. Im not sure what to say or how to act,Maybe theyll come on to me,Maybe I will get AIDS be being around them,I have to show disapproval of gays so people will know for sure I am not one.Prejudices do not only affect gay and lesbian people, those who hold these prejudices are also affected. Sexual orientation has been discovered to impact employee performance. “When managers send signals or messages that it is not okay to be gay in the workplace, and they do, they negatively impact performance” (Powers & Ellis, 1995, p. 4). Whenever a manger or coworker tells a homophobic joke, the message is sent that it is not okay to be yourself and when these messages are received, many employees feel forced to hide their sexual identity. This hiding begins to take a tremendous amount of psychological and physical energy, causing these employees to divert their energies away from work performance to protect themselves by covering up facts, keeping low profiles, and lying. When people feel excluded, they are much less inclined to devote energy toward making the organization successful.
Most of the difficulties inherent in introducing sexual orientation issues into workplace settings are because of misconceptions held by heterosexual people about those who are gay or lesbian. A few of these misconceptions include:
Being gay is a choice,Gay lifestyle is immoral because it is forbidden by the Bible,All gays have AIDS, and if we let them work here, well get AIDS too,People who associate with gays are probably gay themselves.Accurate information and the right attitude can go a long way to bridging the gap when employees are unsure of how to behave in a particular situation. Unless an organization is well educated on the issues of sexual orientation and their impact on workplace performance and possess the skills and resources required to effectively manage these issues, organizations will not get optimal performance from the employees within the organization.
AnalysisThe millions of U.S. gay and lesbian employees are a group of knowledgeable consumers. They are also a group to quickly spread word throughout the sexual minority community about companies that have and do not have practices and policies addressing homophobia. According to Gerald Hunt, “the demands gays and lesbians are making for equality in the workplace closely mirror the demands made by women and other minorities: they do not want extraordinary rights or privileges, merely the same rights and protection enjoyed by others” (1995, p. 150). Eliminating homophobia in any organization has not been an easy task but in the past years there have been a number of important developments heightening the potential for change in the area of gay rights in the workplace.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on the basis of sex as well as race, color, national origin, and religion. It is unlawful to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of his or her sex in regard to hiring, termination, promotion, compensation, job training, or any other privilege of employment. Unfortunately, it is still legal to fire someone based on his or her sexual orientation in 34 states (Human Rights Campaign, 2005). Many organizations and employees have addressed this inequality by developing initiatives to protect gay and lesbian employees.
Company InitiativesOrganizations recognize that people will perform successfully if they are carefully selected, know their job and what is expected of them, have adequate tools, knowledge, skills, and training, and receive feedback, recognition, and rewards that reinforce successful performance. These components make up a performance system and it is this system that is grossly inadequate in a lot of organizations.
Managers can help organizations take the first step to improving performance systems by hiring diversity-sensitive employees. “Specifically ask for examples of working successfully with people of varying sexual orientations. You will increase the likelihood that these employees will carry out their diversity responsibilities, and help to create an inclusive workplace” (Powers & Ellis, 1995, p. 84). These new employees should possess the willingness to embrace an organizations diversity policies and values and once they are hired, their responsibilities in the area of diversity need to be communicated to them. These responsibilities should include promoting acceptance of all people within the organization by aggressively supporting the companys
*(Powers & Ellis, 1995, p. 68). However, this is not necessary. The companys employees who are hired should have experience in conducting a “take-no-prisoners” culture in their organization where they will take it upon themselves to ensure the organization is doing right by the minority of participants (Powers & Ellis, 1995, p. 68). Employees with disabilities should be well served by getting involved to find out what is going on in the minority community.
These processes are extremely important for the ability to achieve successful outcomes for non-profit organizations such as the United Way, which has a population of more than 2.6 million (Powers, 1996). In a 2000 post I explained that if not for the hiring process, the US economy would be much better off as a whole. There can be two basic principles that can be applied to the hiring process. One is “inclusion, but inclusivity.” It is a fact that Americans are more open about their beliefs and that many may be less open about their own biases than the average person (p. 16). The second principle is the need to make positive changes in the business. That is to say, the business should allow nonprofits, and the nonprofit employee group (or organization) as a whole, to choose and participate in diverse activities. As a manager, there is no single solution. The choice must be made based on shared values and interests.
I am grateful to my colleagues for their involvement—the opportunity to learn more about how leadership works and apply it to how diverse companies operate, to gain valuable experience from others in the field, and to help my colleagues make the most of this opportunity. Here we should also seek to establish a culture of diversity in which people learn and learn on the job and continue to learn, not just in their careers. This is a very important objective and needs to be considered.
SOCIAL MEDIA: Facebook (Powers ' Nussbaum & Pinsky; 2011, p. 492). For more information from the White House on the diversity process
A group of organizations has been asked to support a White House task force on workplace diversity, a body of scholars who work with organizations throughout the country. The Task Force will look at the specific needs of employers and their workers, and discuss opportunities for improvement in diversity among companies, including hiring changes, and also provide recommendations for how this department may be expanded and managed.
The Task Force is chaired by the president of the National Association of Chief Executive Officers (NAO), an industry body that advises every organization, including the government on how to implement a new system of workplace diversity in industries such as agriculture, energy, manufacturing, health care, banking, and healthcare.
The Task Force will have five members led by the president and his staff. Two members are the director of the Office of Management and Budget and the chairman of the National Restaurant Association, with the latter the director of the Federal Trade Commission.