Space TravelEssay title: Space TravelAlex GagosianComposition IIInstructor BieniekAbstractFunding by the government allows selected human beings to experience a world beyond the atmosphere of earth. Some of mans greatest accomplishments have occurred in space, such as the moon landing. Space travel not only provides the delightful experience, but it also helps us to better our technology as the year’s progress. Although these are positive aspects of space travel, there are negative aspects that strongly linger, making space travel not so promising.
As you may know, funding for space travel has cost the people in our society a great deal of money. The government has managed to put the U.S. in debt causing an economic domino effect on other sectors of the economy, such as taxes. Not only is space travel costly from the expenses, lives have been taken as well. Tests have gone wrong resulting in the death of astronauts. Before an astronaut can walk on the moon, they have to go through various tests, which help them prepare for their conquest. During these tests, they are still in great danger for three men died in a fire while conducting what they call a preflight test. Many other astronauts have died through the years before actually stepping foot on the moon, and have also died in space as well during an expedition. These negative aspects of space travel are the main reasons why space travel is not worth its many costs.
Space Travel: Should NASA be held responsible for the Apollo disasters, such as the preflight mission that Jim Loy, a scientist and astronomer, alludes to?
On January 27, 1967, on launch pad 34, Edward White, Virgil (Gus) Grissom, and Roger Chaffee died in a fire, during a preflight test. Their mission had been designated Apollo 204. After the accident, it was named Apollo 1…Numerous problems developed with oxygen and communications, and the test dragged on and on. Various communications went awry. Then five and a half hours after they had entered the command module, Chafee said, “Fire, I smell fire.” Two seconds later, White shouted, “Fire in the cockpit.” A few seconds later they were dead from smoke inhalation. (p. 1).
The Apollo 1 event is one of the many tragic events that have come about because of preflight testing for astronauts. Is space travel worth the extravagant expenses in past and present times? The costs of death, debt, and society out weigh the positive effects of Space Travel. Past events and the impact of space travel have branded space travel not being worth its many expenses.
The actual costs of space travel in recent years have soared well beyond the billions, which in return have added to the national debt (over three trillion dollars today). Just last year another problem occurred involving a material break up of a panel on the side of a spacecraft, causing a life-staking event in returning through the atmosphere. Are the tests that NASA run actually ready for real life exploration in space or are they just proposals they hope to achieve; are the tests worth the millions and even billions of dollars being spent by the public and Federal Government. Space tourism has also become an issue especially when accounting for the costs that are involved with the trips. Mike Kelley from the North Jersey Media Group reveals that a wealthy man “Olsen, who grew up in Ridgefield Park and earned a fortune in science research, paid $20 million for a nine-day trip on a Russian rocket ship to the International Space Station. He claims his priority is to conduct experiments. Critics have another name for his star trek: space tourism.” (p.1). People such as Greg Olsen are spending millions of dollars on space travel just to catch a glimpse of the earth from outer space. This certainly cannot be a logical way to use money. If you had twenty million dollars would you spend it on yourself or others in need?
All the money being spent on space travel does not come “directly” out of U.S. citizens pockets, such as a tax would impose. The Federal Government and private organizations, institutions, and corporations are primarily where the money is extracted. The problem is the U.S. doesn’t have billions of dollars to throw around, so most of the money used for space travel is budgeted into the U.S. deficit. This deficit affects all U.S. citizens through taxes, interest rates, consumption, and investment. Society as a whole is affected tremendously economically. Now when a natural disaster occurs all the money is tied up in the deficit, and federal agencies battle over where the disaster relief money should come from. While all this bickering is taking place within the government, millions of people could be in grave danger. Just a
n.e., a person of the U.S. is being taken by surprise. It’s been documented that in 2012 the number of people transported to, or from, the ISS grew to 18,000 and reached its maximum value in 2012.
In 2011 the U.S. Government sent $2.5 billion in private contracts and $700 million in FY15 appropriations for the U.S. Space Center. We have about 4,000 personnel working on, and operating on, our $15.5 billion budget to date. The new funding represents $1.5 bn of the total $1.4 bn of cost savings in the United States for a budget of $30 bn in FY15 alone. The $25 bn cost savings in FY15 would be equivalent to a cost reduction of $9.8 bn. In return for the funding, we would invest the $2.5 billion that the U.S. received in FY15 in public, private, and private space operations.
Space station
Copyright © 1998, 2018, Lina D. Vostok
Atlas Shrugged: “The Story of America’s Space Pioneers, by William Gibson