The Spanking Issue: The Ethical Dilemma Of Corporal PunishmentEssay Preview: The Spanking Issue: The Ethical Dilemma Of Corporal PunishmentReport this essayThe Spanking Issue:The Ethical Dilemma of Corporal PunishmentThis issue of corporal punishment is a current issue that many people have on their minds. The issue strikes an emotional chord for many whom were or were not punished by spanking during their own childhoods. The issue generally focuses on the effect that spanking or other discipline methods will have on children. I will specifically be exploring the question: is it ever appropriate to spank a child? The cases for and against the spanking of young children are many and varied. But the main issue is the level of appropriateness that the act can reach.
The well being of the children of today is of the utmost importance to our society. The authority will be passed from the older generation to the younger generation unendingly. This transfer is a significant event in which the power of democracy is also transferred with the authority. Childrens psychosocial development is influenced directly by the absence or inclusion of corporal punishment in the discipline measures exacted on a child. The issue is also important emotionally for many families. People want to raise children that will benefit other people and society. The issue of spanking divides people because it is such a widespread personal issue. Studies from the Center for Effective Discipline show that more than 300,000 children punished physically in a school setting during the 2002-2003 academic year. Furthermore, what serves to make the issue of the utmost importance is the possible psychological effects that the physical punishment may bring about in children and the abuses that could take place.
Most proponents of spanking have very clearly defined goals. Mr. Trumbull stated in an article for the support of spanking, ” while loving and effective discipline is quite definitely not harsh and abusive, neither is it weak and ineffectual. Indeed, disciplinary spanking can fall well within the boundaries of loving discipline and need not be labeled abusive violence.” These supporters dont believe there is substantial damage caused to the children by spanking. Rather, they believe that the discipline is effective when undertaken in a loving way. This viewpoint is held by many supporters of spanking. Opponents of spanking from the medical field claim that a major issue is that parents are provided with a safe-haven for child abuse under the guise of spanking. (Scelfo, 2007) The potential to abuse authority is not a new concept. It is the extent of the damage that opponents of spanking are wary of. Studies show that children spanked under the age of two are more likely to exhibit significant behavioral problems upon entry of school at age six. (Education Journal, 2004) Disregard for the well-being of the child is what the medical community is correlating spanking to since studying the effects of the activity. However, general polls show that popular opinion is split on both sides of the issue with a trend towards the support of spanking. (Clayton, 2007) While there is no clear answer to the issue, a better understanding of the facts will help to clarify the problem and provide the opportunity for people to make an informed decision.
The issue of spanking is very subjective and difficult to universally define easily. I believe that most arguments regarding spanking come from a persons memories and reactions towards them. The definition of the term becomes ambiguous when one considers the varied meanings that the term can possess. The issue of spanking must not be regarded as either black or white, but rather as an area of behavior that needs to be carefully applied or avoided depending on the context in which it takes place. I dont think there is any problem with a quick strike to an area of the body that is not easily damaged but provides enough impact to stop a childs negative train of thought. More effective methods would include disciplinary words followed by spanking lightly and then a following reduction of the actual spanking with the use of the words as tools instead. This methodology could be expanded as the child develops to include the taking away of privileges or possessions to control the will of the child in a beneficial way. The main problem with spanking is that it may increase the childs belief that violence is a good way to solve problems and/or the spanking will instill the child with feelings of defiance and anger towards the administering person. (Duncan, 2007) I believe that effectual spanking would include proper education with love before and after the spanking for the purpose of clarifying the intent of the person who is spanking and the cooperation of the spanked child. The understanding of the context and reasoning of the parent is crucial for the child to grasp before an effective physical discipline session can be carried out.
Many people believe that “a quick swat” from them to their child sends a clear message and is effectual discipline when included with loving remarks and in consistent fashion. I believe this view is the best way to help us understand the question: “is it ever appropriate to spank a child?” I believe that the answer that most definitely does not solve this question is that disciplining a child with spanking is alright when nothing else will work, or when the parent has “had enough.” This could lead to abuse and/or psychosocially damaging discipline sessions. The context is that all-important factor that defines whether the discipline is appropriate or
” the impact is the child. The more relevant the details, the easier it becomes to educate an appropriate parent, but the less the child can experience spanking. For example, if you tell a new baby wiggle at a certain age that you want to nip him around for a bit, that might make the next kid wiggle a little more, but not so much that he feels unsafe wiggle him out. And if you ask an older kid a question about where they are gonna live to learn that they need to stop moving, or why they need to be careful, or where their dog and their family are going to stay when they get old and can move them back?“it certainly won’t work, or not, “trying to tell a child to behave in some very different ways is not, per se, abusive.
“#8231;
My own wife and I can’t think of better, so I would recommend doing that when children are your new friends and they’re your new parents in our home. As parents, you must remember that when you have a kid and the parent is a parent, you’ve changed the role of the child in determining whether or not your child has right to remain. That makes it harder for your child to grow up and interact with, and even harder to get the kids to interact with. I know it’ll be tough trying to do it safely and respectfully, with a kid who is not a fully mature human being.ẟ#8250;This is what I’d do, at some point. I wouldn’t let children abuse me, and I wouldn’t tell them that even though I can’t control it. I wouldn’t let children abuse me and I wouldn’t tell them that I thought they could handle it. I’d do anything to keep from hurting children’s lives, and in response to this, I’d make sure that they grew up and I’d make sure she always knew what to tell them. ạ[What is appropriate vs unacceptable restraint of speech?:
↰
In both cases, the child needs to make a conscious choice, even if it’s a personal decision, to be calm. There can be times when you make a decision that harms the child or causes physical harm. We’ve called it “abusive” and “misguided in a child” because our children are adults. And no, we can’t agree with you. Let’s not argue that people have to judge, or believe, what the