George Orwell’s 1984Essay title: George Orwell’s 1984The terrors of a totalitarian government presented in George Orwell’s 1984 apply not only to the Party, but also to the Stalinist Russia of the 1930’s. Frightening similarities exist between these two bodies which both started out as forms of government, and then mutated into life-controlling political organizations which “subordinated all institutions and classes under one supreme power” (Buckler 924). Orwell shows how such a system can impose its will on the people through manipulation of media, constant supervision as aided by technology, and the threat of pain, both physical and mental. Orwell also shows how the state has more subtle methods for imposing its authority, such as the manipulation of language and propaganda as they are used to achieve the goal of absolute power for the system. A key parallel between the Party and Stalin’s Communism is the use of technology and communication to control the economic, social, and personal aspects of life.
Stalin and Big Brother achieved total control, not only of social and economic aspects of the state, but also of their people’s personal lives. They did this first and foremost by constantly observing the people. Both Stalin & “The Party” believed in total control over their “party members”. The objectives of the Spies, the Ministry of Truth, Thought Police, and the telescreens in Oceania are mirrored in Stalin’s Russia by the actions of the KGB, and all the technologies they used to monitor people. Another way was by altering all forms of media. The Ministry of Truth worked to change the past in all forms of media, making Big Brother appear to have always been right. Stalin had books rewritten, histories revamped, and paintings altered to feature his presence. Although unlimited control could not be achieved in 1930’s Russia, Orwell gives Big Brother this power to demonstrate how, if ever attained, it would lead to the complete destruction of individual freedom.
Powell, “Beyond Utopia: Russia and the United States in the Nineteenth Century, 1950 to 2012,” New York Quarterly Review, December 24, 2006, 112-12.
|
|
President Kennedy, Jr. has a history of trying to influence American opinion, and his legacy has had a huge effect on government. At the time of the American Revolution, it was not a true democracy. | It is now quite clear that President Kennedy, Jr., had been very effective at trying to influence American policy and was ultimately the great leader of a very large country. It was a very unusual moment in American history when a young man, such as he was, used his power over America, as a weapon against the American people. With all this, it is hard to say how much of a success it was for Kennedy to be able to influence American policymakers, and to influence President Eisenhower during his final weeks in office. But it was clear that Kennedy’s strategy for making America more prosperous and prosperous, at least during the last eight weeks, was successful: America never needed more money, never ever needed higher levels of investment, and never grew more prosperous. He put so much faith in American ingenuity and military abilities (and then, of course, in America’s ability to build a better-than-adequate military) that he didn’t believe that there was anything that could be done to help it to grow economically. He did it by bringing together a large-scale civil-military alliance and by using the new technology necessary to defeat a Russian attack. It was the great American strategy for a century in the face of an unprecedented Russian threat: the Soviets. Obama won the popular vote in 2004, but only because of his public support for it, which was still the case when Obama was President. His policies of trying to make the United States more successful and prosperous in the first place, helped lead to the creation of a large-scale NATO organization and a major military presence in Europe from which the next big problem could emerge: North Korea. These actions are part of the same process in which Obama launched a series of wars to counter North Koreaâ€
& Iraq was used to defend its own security interests, and in doing so, had been able to bring its own kind of military capability and prestige. It was not only the United States, for a time, which was the target of military threats, but American leadership and support of the Soviet Union and the United States had made it possible to contain and prevent all potential nuclear and nuclear-armed states. Since it took just a few years after U.S. military operations in Iraq had ended for the first time, with Obama’s presidency and the establishment of a permanent ground operation in the Persian Gulf to protect the U.S Tangible similarities between the two leaders, Stalin and Big Brother, are also daunting. Joseph Stalin could easily fit the description of Big Brother in the novel. Stalin had his 5-year plan for the economy, just as references were made to the 3-year plans in 1984. The Party rejects and vilifies every principle for which the Socialist movement ever stood, and it chooses to do this in the name of Socialism, just as Stalin claimed to be following Lenin, when in reality he had his own ambitions. Stalin used massive amounts of propaganda to show how well the soviets were doing. In reality most people were oppressed & hungry just as in 1984.”The Party” did the same through the false reports in the “Times” and over the telescreens. Also Stalin would eliminate any rivals for power (ex. when he killed off his rivals Kamenev & Zinoviev after a public trial where they were denounced as traitors). “The Party” does this with most of their”traitors”(Public hangings,etc). Stalin “purged the people who did not agree with him when he came to power. So did “the Party”. They killed Winstons parents and many others. Also Stalin exiled his primary political rival, Trotsky, just as “BIG BROTHER” got rid of Emanuel Goldstein. So as you can see Stalins “Soviet Union” was much like “Oceania” The monitoring for Big Brother is achieved by telescreens, the Thought Police, other Party member, and even your own family. Another way both Stalin and Big Brother tried to gain power was by changing language. The Party seeks to stifle any individual or “potentially revolutionary” thought by introducing a new language, Newspeak, and the subsequent eradication of the English language. The introduction of this new language means that eventually, no one is able to commit thoughtcrime due to the lack of words to express it. This is a frightening concept; the restriction of your thought could Stalin’S Communism And Big Brother. (September 29, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/stalins-communism-and-big-brother-essay/ |