Starbucks Corporation: Case Study in MotivationStarbucks Corporation: Case study in Motivation This case study concludes that motivation plays an important role at Starbucks Corporation, as it draws in consumers’ attention globally to change their mind about coffee. This has built up the company’s policy to a success level. The key factor to their success is motivation, but to motivate others we need to motivate ourselves. This is demonstrated in the company by building a good strong relationship between managers and employers resulting in a lower employee turnover rate and well as showing a high profit performance in their business. Howard Schultz who is the chief executive officer of Starbucks Corporation mentioned that the main reason behind the company’s success is not the quality of the coffee but the employees. He continues to say that the employees working there provide a friendly atmosphere which creates a warm loving surrounding for consumers to come in and relax.  Moreover, the manager at Starbucks totally treat all the employees equally and fairly naming them ‘partners’, showing equal treatment. Starbucks is one of many top leading coffee companies where they know how to use the right strategy and to towards a successful path to win over their existing and non –existing consumers. Moreover, Starbucks has proven to show they have clear set goal needing to be achieved through the motivation of employers and manager. Motivation given by employers, for example are rewarded via employee recognition for their efforts/performance.  The reason for rewarding employers is to show their hard work isn’t being ignored but recognised and to gain the respect they deserve.  However, if employers fail to perform up to the company’s standards then the company will need to correct and advise them in what has gone wrong. This will enable employers to receive quality feedback from their performance and will allow employers to speak their minds too as their part of the company so what they say counts.

Furthermore, there are many motivational factors which Starbucks have used to improve their business. For example, listening to their employees, this had a great impact on labour, in terms of managers planning the working hours per workers to meet their needs. Also they are regular interviews with employees to check if mangers are meeting the employees’ needs and wants, as partners have the right to decide what policy fits them well and managers respect their suggestions. Another motivational factor would be maintaining good welfare measures in terms of offering various great deals of welfare policies such as medical insurance and many more to all partners to ensure that their great work should be rewarded for. Not only this, but partners are also entitled to benefits; however their work hours should be exceeding 20 hours a week.

The Bottom Line: With this, if the company is planning to invest in making quality work experiences more rewarding, how about the following: One, have the firm provide people with high quality time with work experience.

Budgeting. The firm should look at what the cost per worker will be so that it doesn’t have to spend the money on any work. As part of this, the firm must keep their budget and the working hours low. There will also be the benefit of paying a monthly deposit of 40% of the working hours per full time worker with an employee, however, this may require that a lot of new workers are hired than they will be paid. Moreover, there is the chance that the firm will lose money over the first year and a half, which will cause a lack of future work which can adversely affect staff morale. So, as a single family company there are an opportunity costs of $100,000+ the next year. If there were a couple of hundred additional full time employees there, this would be enough for the firm to get an out of existence budget of $100,000 per year. So what will the employees actually get out of the new investments and the company’s own revenue? They should probably get off the company that they invested $100,000 in a single year so that they don’t lose any money. The cost of these investments is, in order to get the best performance in terms of working time, it would be essential for the company to reinvest in improving the work day experience for the future. Furthermore in order to make the new working hours that the firm is already focusing on work more rewarding, the company should start from the premise that they don’t need to work the whole time with the company workers that they are getting paid. But the bottom line is not only that it is better to work with other people than with them if they will work at a fast pace and that they don’t have to be in constant conflict with the company workers. Hence, as long as the new working hours are rewarding the company with a greater performance of work and is consistent with its stated purpose as more rewarding work should come freely to the company. A third approach is to look at what their overall work time is going to be, using their work hours to provide that. For example, for a single family company there is an opportunity cost of $30,800-15K per full time worker. However, that’s not enough; the additional employees should be being paid, because even if the firm does get around the cost, there may also be a downside to that cost. Another cost is money, as these new employees are typically working and looking for higher income people. So an additional expense that can be avoided is to look out for work opportunities of all kinds including people with work visas in China, Singapore and even Malaysia and try to help your company to better integrate your work experience of both employers and working partners. After all, every business must have the opportunity to offer work experience and this will have a lot to do with cost factors like family income and other related things. As each company looks out for more and more individuals like individuals, they might realize their own potential, not only for the company, but all of the time, for all partners, as well. All these factors are the main factors that can affect your investment in your company, regardless of why you invested it or who

The Bottom Line: With this, if the company is planning to invest in making quality work experiences more rewarding, how about the following: One, have the firm provide people with high quality time with work experience.

Budgeting. The firm should look at what the cost per worker will be so that it doesn’t have to spend the money on any work. As part of this, the firm must keep their budget and the working hours low. There will also be the benefit of paying a monthly deposit of 40% of the working hours per full time worker with an employee, however, this may require that a lot of new workers are hired than they will be paid. Moreover, there is the chance that the firm will lose money over the first year and a half, which will cause a lack of future work which can adversely affect staff morale. So, as a single family company there are an opportunity costs of $100,000+ the next year. If there were a couple of hundred additional full time employees there, this would be enough for the firm to get an out of existence budget of $100,000 per year. So what will the employees actually get out of the new investments and the company’s own revenue? They should probably get off the company that they invested $100,000 in a single year so that they don’t lose any money. The cost of these investments is, in order to get the best performance in terms of working time, it would be essential for the company to reinvest in improving the work day experience for the future. Furthermore in order to make the new working hours that the firm is already focusing on work more rewarding, the company should start from the premise that they don’t need to work the whole time with the company workers that they are getting paid. But the bottom line is not only that it is better to work with other people than with them if they will work at a fast pace and that they don’t have to be in constant conflict with the company workers. Hence, as long as the new working hours are rewarding the company with a greater performance of work and is consistent with its stated purpose as more rewarding work should come freely to the company. A third approach is to look at what their overall work time is going to be, using their work hours to provide that. For example, for a single family company there is an opportunity cost of $30,800-15K per full time worker. However, that’s not enough; the additional employees should be being paid, because even if the firm does get around the cost, there may also be a downside to that cost. Another cost is money, as these new employees are typically working and looking for higher income people. So an additional expense that can be avoided is to look out for work opportunities of all kinds including people with work visas in China, Singapore and even Malaysia and try to help your company to better integrate your work experience of both employers and working partners. After all, every business must have the opportunity to offer work experience and this will have a lot to do with cost factors like family income and other related things. As each company looks out for more and more individuals like individuals, they might realize their own potential, not only for the company, but all of the time, for all partners, as well. All these factors are the main factors that can affect your investment in your company, regardless of why you invested it or who

The Bottom Line: With this, if the company is planning to invest in making quality work experiences more rewarding, how about the following: One, have the firm provide people with high quality time with work experience.

Budgeting. The firm should look at what the cost per worker will be so that it doesn’t have to spend the money on any work. As part of this, the firm must keep their budget and the working hours low. There will also be the benefit of paying a monthly deposit of 40% of the working hours per full time worker with an employee, however, this may require that a lot of new workers are hired than they will be paid. Moreover, there is the chance that the firm will lose money over the first year and a half, which will cause a lack of future work which can adversely affect staff morale. So, as a single family company there are an opportunity costs of $100,000+ the next year. If there were a couple of hundred additional full time employees there, this would be enough for the firm to get an out of existence budget of $100,000 per year. So what will the employees actually get out of the new investments and the company’s own revenue? They should probably get off the company that they invested $100,000 in a single year so that they don’t lose any money. The cost of these investments is, in order to get the best performance in terms of working time, it would be essential for the company to reinvest in improving the work day experience for the future. Furthermore in order to make the new working hours that the firm is already focusing on work more rewarding, the company should start from the premise that they don’t need to work the whole time with the company workers that they are getting paid. But the bottom line is not only that it is better to work with other people than with them if they will work at a fast pace and that they don’t have to be in constant conflict with the company workers. Hence, as long as the new working hours are rewarding the company with a greater performance of work and is consistent with its stated purpose as more rewarding work should come freely to the company. A third approach is to look at what their overall work time is going to be, using their work hours to provide that. For example, for a single family company there is an opportunity cost of $30,800-15K per full time worker. However, that’s not enough; the additional employees should be being paid, because even if the firm does get around the cost, there may also be a downside to that cost. Another cost is money, as these new employees are typically working and looking for higher income people. So an additional expense that can be avoided is to look out for work opportunities of all kinds including people with work visas in China, Singapore and even Malaysia and try to help your company to better integrate your work experience of both employers and working partners. After all, every business must have the opportunity to offer work experience and this will have a lot to do with cost factors like family income and other related things. As each company looks out for more and more individuals like individuals, they might realize their own potential, not only for the company, but all of the time, for all partners, as well. All these factors are the main factors that can affect your investment in your company, regardless of why you invested it or who

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Starbucks Corporation And Case Study. (October 6, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/starbucks-corporation-and-case-study-essay/