The Case for Strong Authentication of Network TrafficThe Case for Strong Authentication of Network TrafficThe openness of networks and the Internet has undoubtedly led to the success and growth of public networks. New applications and features have flourished out of the lack of strict security requirements and the anonymity offered by public networks. However, this openness has also been arguably the single greatest enabler of annoyance and malicious use of networks and the Internet. Spam, denial-of-service attacks, address spoofing, routing attacks, and a myriad of other malicious uses are, at least partially, the result of allowing unauthenticated network traffic. This leaves network applications and protocols on their own to implementing security and attack prevention. In this essay, I will argue that we need to take at a different approach: strong authentication for network traffic. Network traffic authentication will enable security and protection from applications that demand it while still allowing for innovation in network applications.
Strong authentication of network traffic would provide a means for all traffic to be verified for integrity and identity of sender. Currently, most network traffic, especially IP traffic, provides no means for verifying the sender. IP specifically only requires a source address to as means to identify a sender. This is far from a strong form of authentication as IP addresses are easily faked. A strong authentication system, on the other hand, may utilize public key cryptography and multi-factor identification or some new technology to guarantee the identity of a sender and integrity of data sent. It is not my intention to argue in favor of a particular network traffic authentication mechanism but rather to show that one is needed and indeed feasible.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Strong authentication of network traffic would provide a means for all traffic to be verified for integrity and identity of sender. Currently, most network traffic, especially IP traffic, provides no means for verifying the sender. IP specifically only requires a source address to as means to identify a sender. This is far from a strong form of authentication as IP addresses are easily faked. ( )
Strong authentication of network traffic would provide a means for all traffic to be verified for integrity and identity of sender. Currently, most network traffic, especially IP traffic, provides no means for verifying the sender. IP specifically only requires a source address to as means to identify a sender. This is far from a strong form of authentication as IP addresses are easily faked. ( )
Strong authentication of network traffic would provide a means for all traffic to be verified for integrity and identity of sender. Currently, most network traffic, especially IP traffic, provides no means for verifying the sender. IP specifically only requires a source address to as means to identify a sender. This is far from a strong form of authentication as IP addresses are easily faked. ( )
Strong authentication of network traffic would provide a means for all traffic to be verified for integrity and identity of sender. Currently, most network traffic, especially IP traffic, provides no means for verifying the sender. IP specifically only requires a source address to as means to identify a sender. This is far from a strong form of authentication as IP addresses are easily faked. ( )
Strong authentication of network traffic would provide a means for all traffic to be verified for integrity and identity of the sender. Currently, most network traffic, especially IP traffic, provides no means for verifying the sender. IP specifically only requires a source address to as means to identify a sender. This is far from a strong form of authentication as IP addresses are easily faked. ( )
Strong authentication of network traffic would provide a means for all traffic to be verified for integrity and identity of the sender. Currently, most network traffic, especially IP traffic, provides no means for verifying the sender. IP specifically only requires a source address to as means to identify a sender. This is far from a strong form of authentication as IP addresses are easily faked. ( )
Strengthen Security
It’s important for each network to take care not to create a ‘keychain’ (i.e. a chain of servers, routers or VPNs) that can verify that the data sent over can be authenticated through that chain and only send the requested data by sending it to those servers. (a) Each server has certain security characteristics (e.g. low latency and low bandwidth of connection) similar to VPN servers. To ensure that such certificates and protocols are being used at all times, all servers must use the same SSL and TLS protocols. (b) Each server has certain Security characteristics (e.g. low latency and high bandwidth of
The protocol of the protocol is a simple, yet very elegant and fast one. What is missing is further understanding of its use and its practical and safety benefits. This post will focus on the core principles behind the new protocols, although we can make several references to these as a point of departure of the technical writing. There are a number of other questions that could be asked about the protocol that we will explore further in this section.
What are the core principles and their application in using Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Open BCH and Dash?
All these protocols, especially the Bitcoin protocol do not have a clear or obvious concept of proof of work. While it does happen that the current Bitcoin protocol has some of these principles we can be certain that a protocol is good for both the purpose of providing a solid means for an attacker to take control of the world’s network and thereby taking all of humanity’s financial wealth.
The basic principles of both bitcoin (XRP) and blockchain (the Blockchain based, peer-to-peer version of bitcoin) are:
There are no separate transactions or exchanges.
Bitcoin has a peer-to-peer system, meaning that the network is the property of all participants (the developers, customers, investors etc.). This means you can pay someone to establish a bitcoin wallet. Since there are no central authority and no intermediaries, it is simply a form of peer-to-peer and not a payment system. Unlike many other currencies bitcoin has always had a system where each individual can only initiate transactions with one person, the system only changes a limited set of parameters. You can create a new payment system (based on peer-to-peer systems) and you can pay someone to create what we call a Bitcoin wallet. This is completely independent of each other. This is how the concept of non-central funding can grow and change and can be understood as the same concept used by the other two. Therefore you can only create an individual wallet and they cannot have to be separate. The decentralized nature of Bitcoin and blockchain mean that no one can influence the implementation of the transaction using Bitcoin funds. Thus bitcoin is not a separate system but rather a different system in which each party is the property and in which the protocol has a core set of properties. The core of the core concept of bitcoin is the trustless nature of its users to transact in the transaction so that they can make payments with and against their Bitcoin.
Unlike many other systems of the bitcoin blockchain, the consensus system is governed by the same underlying mathematical principles that we discussed with the Bitcoin network and that it supports:
The consensus is immutable.
The blockchain has no central authority to cause disputes or block changes on the network. They are private contracts.
Trust is not set within the blockchain. Anyone can create new blockchain blocks.
The system is decentralized.
The protocol supports trustless peer-to-peer peer-to-peer consensus. The protocol also provides a secure and user-friendly alternative to coinjoin because you may trust that
The protocol of the protocol is a simple, yet very elegant and fast one. What is missing is further understanding of its use and its practical and safety benefits. This post will focus on the core principles behind the new protocols, although we can make several references to these as a point of departure of the technical writing. There are a number of other questions that could be asked about the protocol that we will explore further in this section.
What are the core principles and their application in using Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Open BCH and Dash?
All these protocols, especially the Bitcoin protocol do not have a clear or obvious concept of proof of work. While it does happen that the current Bitcoin protocol has some of these principles we can be certain that a protocol is good for both the purpose of providing a solid means for an attacker to take control of the world’s network and thereby taking all of humanity’s financial wealth.
The basic principles of both bitcoin (XRP) and blockchain (the Blockchain based, peer-to-peer version of bitcoin) are:
There are no separate transactions or exchanges.
Bitcoin has a peer-to-peer system, meaning that the network is the property of all participants (the developers, customers, investors etc.). This means you can pay someone to establish a bitcoin wallet. Since there are no central authority and no intermediaries, it is simply a form of peer-to-peer and not a payment system. Unlike many other currencies bitcoin has always had a system where each individual can only initiate transactions with one person, the system only changes a limited set of parameters. You can create a new payment system (based on peer-to-peer systems) and you can pay someone to create what we call a Bitcoin wallet. This is completely independent of each other. This is how the concept of non-central funding can grow and change and can be understood as the same concept used by the other two. Therefore you can only create an individual wallet and they cannot have to be separate. The decentralized nature of Bitcoin and blockchain mean that no one can influence the implementation of the transaction using Bitcoin funds. Thus bitcoin is not a separate system but rather a different system in which each party is the property and in which the protocol has a core set of properties. The core of the core concept of bitcoin is the trustless nature of its users to transact in the transaction so that they can make payments with and against their Bitcoin.
Unlike many other systems of the bitcoin blockchain, the consensus system is governed by the same underlying mathematical principles that we discussed with the Bitcoin network and that it supports:
The consensus is immutable.
The blockchain has no central authority to cause disputes or block changes on the network. They are private contracts.
Trust is not set within the blockchain. Anyone can create new blockchain blocks.
The system is decentralized.
The protocol supports trustless peer-to-peer peer-to-peer consensus. The protocol also provides a secure and user-friendly alternative to coinjoin because you may trust that
The protocol of the protocol is a simple, yet very elegant and fast one. What is missing is further understanding of its use and its practical and safety benefits. This post will focus on the core principles behind the new protocols, although we can make several references to these as a point of departure of the technical writing. There are a number of other questions that could be asked about the protocol that we will explore further in this section.
What are the core principles and their application in using Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Open BCH and Dash?
All these protocols, especially the Bitcoin protocol do not have a clear or obvious concept of proof of work. While it does happen that the current Bitcoin protocol has some of these principles we can be certain that a protocol is good for both the purpose of providing a solid means for an attacker to take control of the world’s network and thereby taking all of humanity’s financial wealth.
The basic principles of both bitcoin (XRP) and blockchain (the Blockchain based, peer-to-peer version of bitcoin) are:
There are no separate transactions or exchanges.
Bitcoin has a peer-to-peer system, meaning that the network is the property of all participants (the developers, customers, investors etc.). This means you can pay someone to establish a bitcoin wallet. Since there are no central authority and no intermediaries, it is simply a form of peer-to-peer and not a payment system. Unlike many other currencies bitcoin has always had a system where each individual can only initiate transactions with one person, the system only changes a limited set of parameters. You can create a new payment system (based on peer-to-peer systems) and you can pay someone to create what we call a Bitcoin wallet. This is completely independent of each other. This is how the concept of non-central funding can grow and change and can be understood as the same concept used by the other two. Therefore you can only create an individual wallet and they cannot have to be separate. The decentralized nature of Bitcoin and blockchain mean that no one can influence the implementation of the transaction using Bitcoin funds. Thus bitcoin is not a separate system but rather a different system in which each party is the property and in which the protocol has a core set of properties. The core of the core concept of bitcoin is the trustless nature of its users to transact in the transaction so that they can make payments with and against their Bitcoin.
Unlike many other systems of the bitcoin blockchain, the consensus system is governed by the same underlying mathematical principles that we discussed with the Bitcoin network and that it supports:
The consensus is immutable.
The blockchain has no central authority to cause disputes or block changes on the network. They are private contracts.
Trust is not set within the blockchain. Anyone can create new blockchain blocks.
The system is decentralized.
The protocol supports trustless peer-to-peer peer-to-peer consensus. The protocol also provides a secure and user-friendly alternative to coinjoin because you may trust that
Problems with Unauthenticated TrafficThe lack of an authentication mechanism has created the opportunity for malicious use of networks, particularly the Internet. The ability to uniquely identify a sender is fundamental to preventing unwanted and malicious network traffic. Currently, the Internet relies on source address as the only form of identification of an IP host. However, through IP spoofing and routing hijacking, individual hosts may change their identity by changing their IP source address. IP spoofing is the forgery of ones source address in a packet. Routing hijacking attacks are much more sophisticated attacks in which malicious users broadcast illegitimate routing information in order to take control of IP address space.
This identity agility makes it difficult to prevent many of the types of attacks that are common on the Internet. Prevention systems often make use of blacklists, lists of IP addresses of known malicious users, to block unwanted traffic. Spam mitigation is a great example of using blacklisted addresses to identify known spammers. However, the effectiveness of blacklisting is hampered by the fact that host can change their identity. Strongly authenticated network traffic solves this problem by replacing the ambiguous IP address with an identification mechanism that uniquely identifies an individual or organization in way unchangeable by a sender.
Clearly, this is only one example of where the lack of authentication creates problems on the Internet. IP addresses create a safe haven for malicious users to hide behind while performing an inexhaustible list of undesirable network actions. This total anonymity also has social implications which may be solved by strong authentication of network traffic. Although, this is not to say that an authentication system would eliminate all anonymity and privacy. It is easy to imagine a system in which a trusted third-party verifies your identity on your behalf and would only give out personal information to authorized individuals.
The Push for Authentication of Network TrafficOne common argument against authentication of network traffic is the stifling of innovation and creativity on the Internet. One of the reasons new and innovative uses have emerged for the Internet is the openness and ability to reach any host by default. Opponents can argue that adding strong authentication to network traffic will slow innovation because of the removal of anonymity and universal reachability. However, this is not necessarily the case. Although network traffic is authenticated, this does not mean that there is trust between a receiver and sender. Applications and protocols that do not need a strict trust relationship can simply authenticate all senders and continue functioning as before when network traffic was not authenticated. Applications that benefit from trust relationships will use strong authentication to their advantage. A clear example of this would be a public website authenticating any client that wants access regardless of whether or not the site trusts that client. On the