The Life Cycle of a MouseEssay title: The Life Cycle of a MouseDepartment of Political ScienceCollege of Arts and Social SciencesMSU-Iligan Institute of TechnologyIligan City, 9200ESSAY/BOOK REVIEW COVER SHEETName:Layasan, Jovel T.Student ID Number: 2004-4527Contact Numbers:09217712718Due Date:January 22, 2007Subject: Political Science 50Date received:January 22, 2007Instructor: Sir Darwin ManubagClass schedule3:00-4:30(Mth)Essay/Thesis TitleSome arguments of Institutional Approach to Philippine PoliticsLength of Essay (number of words) 853 wordsIMPORTANT:Make and keep a copy of all essays and assignments before submitting them for assessmentEssay/thesis extension forms are available at the office of the Department of Political SciencePLAGIARISM AND COLLUSION:Plagiarism is the presentation by a student of an assignment which has in fact been copied in whole or in part from another student’s work, or from any other source without due acknowledgment in the text. Examples include:
A “thesis” is any writing which was printed in a book, or that was in the public domain only. Plagiarisms are not accepted as material if the assignments and/or the text is copyrighted or is otherwise published in any format in which they are claimed to be published. Plagiarism may in certain circumstances apply in the sense of allowing for reproduction or distribution by anyone but solely for personal publicity. Examples include, for example, articles which are made by those with an interest in the theory or practice, or articles where the academic and professional interest is only expressed for academic reference and/or research purposes. (In some states, most of the state’s political party and political party affiliations are not listed as having, or are not listed as having, any political affiliation.) Plagiarism is a term which is used and often used by politicians, scholars, politicians, or some other person, or group of persons, even to express an opinion, and to express the opinion of, a majority of the public, whether in one state, another or a third. Plagiarisms cannot, however, directly apply to any position or organization that is a party, which means that they do not, in fact, influence anything with a political or technical aspect.
I’ve written several essays on Plagiarism in this series. One of these discussions focuses on the possibility of plagiarism when, for example, a paper which deals with the philosophy of Plato was originally published as a pamphlet. It appears the idea was to present only Plato’s philosophy of thought as it actually contained three distinct conceptions of the subject—the Platonic, Platonicism and Platonicism of the Metaphysical and Political Systems. The second discussion dealt with several issues related to plagiarism and the theory of the subject. The fourth set of discussions involved the possibility that a paper, or other work, published as a book, on an assignment or thesis, would be in direct conflict with an article by someone in some other way. This would thus seem to make the plagiarism possibility unlikely. (For more discussion of Plagiarism and the theory of the subject and of its effect in practice, you can read my paper, “A Plagiarizing Case of Unusual Plagiarism: Essays on Unusual Objections to Plagiarism.”) This first set of essays discusses how the Plagiarization Theory has been applied in practice to the field of political science, and how this applied to other disciplines that are similar in their philosophical formulations. As I mentioned in earlier papers, Plagiarism is not an easy problem to solve, especially when the subject is a subject that involves more than “objection” or “objection” to the Plagiarization Principle. Therefore I have created a series of essay “The Ethics of Prakrit,” in which I discuss the ethics of plagiarism and on why it is important for us to develop more sophisticated Plagiaristic theory in order to address this issue.Plagiarism theory is a concept which applies to all political scientists who have been involved with other fields. While some students may be able to distinguish between a plagiarist (an editor or blogger who gives only a small percentage of original contributions) and their fellow academics, most do not. Many of the Plagiarists are people who do not hold a certain political view but who nevertheless are doing so for political reasons. This is a very different kind of Plagiarism than other types of plagiarism. The real problem was not that in this series I am trying to help students or students in any way, or to explain some of our issues by asking them to give away some ideas
Direct duplication, by copying (or allowing to be copied) another’s work. This includes copying from a book, article, journal, web site or another student’s assignment;
Paraphrasing another person’s work with minor changes, but keeping the meaning, form and/or progression of ideas of the original;Piecing together sections of the work of others into a new whole;Submitting an assignment that has already been submitted for assessment in another subject;Presenting an assignment as independent work when it has been produced in whole or in part in collusion with other people, for example, another student or a tutor.
CONSEQUENCES OF PLAGIARISM AND COLLUSION:Where the student is suspected of plagiarism by an examiner, the following procedure will apply:The examiner will present the details to the Chair of the Department who will determine whether to proceed with the matter;If the Chair determines to proceed, the students(s) will be invited to a hearing before a relevant Department Examination Committee;If after the hearing, the Department Examination Committee is of the opinion that the student(s) has been guilty of plagiarism, it may:Return a mark zero for the piece of assessment;Return a fail grade for the subjectRefer the matter to the Dean regarding the possible presentation of a case of academic misconduct to a discipline committee.In all cases where penalty is applied to a student, a written notification will be sent by the Chair of the Department Examination Board.I DECLARE THAT THIS IS MY OWN ORIGINAL WORK.SignatureDate: January 22, 2007ESSAY/ BOOK REVIEW EVALUATIONExcellentNeeds workFail1. Research 40%1.1 Appropriate amount of research1.2 Demonstrated comprehension of material2. Presentation and Organization 30%2.1 Writing Style and Expression- clear &concise? Grammar2.2 Are facts/opinions/quotes referenced