Essay About Such Incidents And Eastern Kentucky University

Black and Blue: Police Abuse of Force
Black and Blue: Police Abuse of Force
Richard Edwards
Professor Wedes
ENGL 1302
November 16, 2006
Black and Blue: Police Abuse of Force
Ever since Rodney King was plunged into the national spotlight following his violent
arrest by Los Angeles Police Department officers, law enforcement agencies nationwide have
been implementing policies in order to cease any such incidents from occurring within their
jurisdiction. Contrary to popular belief, many incidents concerning police abuse of force stems
from Special Weapons and Tactics (S.W.A.T.) officers and not ordinary patrol officers. The
number of police abuse of force incidents involving S.W.A.T. officers have been increasing
over the last few years. Some believe that this is due to their military-esque training, which by
comparison can be related to that of the NAVY SEALs. Not only do these police officers
undergo rigorous military style training, but many of them have experience in the military to
some degree. The risks associated with such teams are high because “Special Response Teams
deal with incidents that have a potential for personal harm and/or loss of life” (Smith 4). Also,
“the cost of poor decisions is the greater risk-to the agency, administrators, team members,
victims, and suspects” (Smith 4). The issue regarding S.W.A.T. team excessive force may never
be eliminated entirely, however, through extensive training involving simulations we can
hopefully limit these number of incidents. This training could possibly instruct S.W.A.T.
officers what not to do given specific situations and circumstances.
A majority of incidents occur because of the overall violent nature of S.W.A.T. team
deployments. According to Professor Peter Kraska, an expert on police militarization from
Eastern Kentucky University, “I get several calls a month from people asking about local
incidents – wrong address raids, excessive use of force, wrongful shootings – this stuff is
happening all the time”. The manner in which these S.W.A.T. teams handle different
situations does not always fit the offense. In S.W.A.T., not one mission is the same, however,
the way that they execute their mission objectives does not fluctuate. For example, the entry
made into a residence while serving a simple warrant is closely mirrored to that of a high-risk
situation. This ultimately increases the possibility for a non-violent offender to then retaliate in
a violent way because of the way the situation was handled. This can also occur on the
opposite end of the spectrum. While reporting to a hostage negotiation scene, S.W.A.T. officers
could actually make matters worse by engaging hostile actions in an already hostile
environment. A possible solution would find S.W.A.T. officers training for different situations
by the degree of danger that it may pose. This would eliminate many of the suicide-by-cop
incidents that occur because of the pressure that is put on when there is a Special Response Team
present. By training for different situations according to the degree of danger that it may pose
would utilize the tactical capabilities of Special Weapons and Tactics teams. This focuses on the
self-discipline aspect which should be higher in a S.W.A.T. team officer because they are
required to decipher the correct amount of force while under a tremendous amount of stress.
Special Response Team members must understand that “the level of professionalism
expected