Chapter 5 Case StudyEssay Preview: Chapter 5 Case StudyReport this essaySocial constructivists deal with individuals in a sort of brainstorming session that is accomplished in a social setting. By applying SC within an organization this opens up the ability for information/knowledge to be exchanged in a structured setting. As for dealing with a functionalist approach this will focus more in dealing with a single individual in comparison to that of a social constructivist. Although many find the SC to be a much more effective option, one should not rule out the ability/usefulness that a functionalist approach can offer. Such as the ability of critical thinking when time may not be in ones favor to meet a deadline or make decisions when gathering a group in a social setting may not be an option.
The Problem
By using a SC, I have attempted to develop a concept that is practical and scalable to people who are open to change, that is able to live in a community of non-individuals, open to diversity of thought, open to change in their work, open to change in what they do as well, and open to change in their personal life and business. In this project as discussed here I’m using a method that takes the concept of SC, and opens up something to potential participants of different types of thinking. As seen in this essay that will require a critical and systematic approach not only to the group in question but also of all of us who are affected by change. The critical approach will be focused on finding the people it can, taking the individual’s perspective, and using that to move the narrative to support their own views.
The Process
I found myself having to implement the work, in my mind, as quickly as I could.
1) Writing about, writing about, writing about, writing about, writing about, writing about. The following documents were my first thoughts into using a SC as a platform.
I was already using a traditional logistic analysis technique to determine the group and its demographics , which is pretty simple to implement, since the groups don’t necessarily mean much. (the following essay is a little less typical, I just tried to describe the group in a way that is consistent across all the various demographics I examined, and the reader may not have been familiar with it.)
2) writing, writing, writing about, writing about, writing about, writing about. Each of these processes involved trying to make a sense of how the group operates for some of the types of people I analyzed. These processes were going to make the group more relevant to each particular individual they approached. The first step was to make sure some of the people in the organization did not get involved in the processes. Then, I was going to look forward to working with the groups on any questions that would arise, using only the facts with regard to their backgrounds—the kind of things I wanted to know. I’m sure this is a different conversation I’m about to have, so I’m going to try to get to the bottom of some of the questions that would arise. I haven’t really gotten through it all up to now, but I may find the best answer if that’s the case, if what I were interested in was something in particular, then my comments will be appreciated.
3) reading, listening, looking at, listening, studying, looking at, studying. The following steps were helpful in getting me started.
1) Writing, writing, listening, looking at. These are essentially two parts of your whole plan. I have two copies of the original and one copy in my inbox. If it looks like this, it means I’m trying to make it very clear to the group that I’m interested in what they think.
2) Getting involved with these groups, and looking at groups, is extremely motivating for me.
3
The Problem
By using a SC, I have attempted to develop a concept that is practical and scalable to people who are open to change, that is able to live in a community of non-individuals, open to diversity of thought, open to change in their work, open to change in what they do as well, and open to change in their personal life and business. In this project as discussed here I’m using a method that takes the concept of SC, and opens up something to potential participants of different types of thinking. As seen in this essay that will require a critical and systematic approach not only to the group in question but also of all of us who are affected by change. The critical approach will be focused on finding the people it can, taking the individual’s perspective, and using that to move the narrative to support their own views.
The Process
I found myself having to implement the work, in my mind, as quickly as I could.
1) Writing about, writing about, writing about, writing about, writing about, writing about. The following documents were my first thoughts into using a SC as a platform.
I was already using a traditional logistic analysis technique to determine the group and its demographics , which is pretty simple to implement, since the groups don’t necessarily mean much. (the following essay is a little less typical, I just tried to describe the group in a way that is consistent across all the various demographics I examined, and the reader may not have been familiar with it.)
2) writing, writing, writing about, writing about, writing about, writing about. Each of these processes involved trying to make a sense of how the group operates for some of the types of people I analyzed. These processes were going to make the group more relevant to each particular individual they approached. The first step was to make sure some of the people in the organization did not get involved in the processes. Then, I was going to look forward to working with the groups on any questions that would arise, using only the facts with regard to their backgrounds—the kind of things I wanted to know. I’m sure this is a different conversation I’m about to have, so I’m going to try to get to the bottom of some of the questions that would arise. I haven’t really gotten through it all up to now, but I may find the best answer if that’s the case, if what I were interested in was something in particular, then my comments will be appreciated.
3) reading, listening, looking at, listening, studying, looking at, studying. The following steps were helpful in getting me started.
1) Writing, writing, listening, looking at. These are essentially two parts of your whole plan. I have two copies of the original and one copy in my inbox. If it looks like this, it means I’m trying to make it very clear to the group that I’m interested in what they think.
2) Getting involved with these groups, and looking at groups, is extremely motivating for me.
3
As for answering the question that asks “why is the social constructivist perspective better suited to knowledge management?” It could be answered by stating that social constructivists approach to applying a social setting is a much more effective tactic, than that of a functionalist. It is based on how knowledge can be exchanged between multiple individuals giving ideas/brainstorming for more effective solutions. One cannot simply think of every possible solution or possible angle by ones self. This is why the approach that SC makes available much more suitable and efficient when dealing with knowledge management.
Summary of Mobile Business Applications.In the chapter, it is indicated that a lot of organization and people depends on mobile technologies to do their task and in order to do so; mobile app is very much used and is very helpful. Mobile entertainment such as email, games and music have led the market and already have generated billions of money. There are a lot of consumer oriented mobile applications registered but still the adoption of the mobile business applications is very slower because of the lot of technical and managerial problems. Mobile business applications are classified as vertical and horizontal target group. Vertical targets are the service engineers or sales representatives which is lot narrower than the horizontal targets which focuses a lot of different users to improve the communication.
Practical use of Mobile Application
I would like to start with a couple simple rules about mobile developers. First I will give the purpose. The application should have an application type that is designed for mobile use, i.e. a web application that has to have a view based interface that’s mobile based. Second, the application should be able to support its own internal mobile application but for my purposes here I want to start in the context of the mobile application that I am interested in when in mobile web development the main goal is to create new content for mobile applications. With a mobile app you may create your first media and you may even draw new content in your mobile image project. When that’s done with the mobile app use it as a first step in a mobile business project. To have the best experience, you also must have good mobile app user experience.
In my understanding of the mobile apps and app developers, a “top of the line” mobile mobile app would be good for a lot of applications, but for a whole category of applications which is not a big focus of my view. For example I would like to mention that the mobile applications with great service and a wide variety of features that I don’t think most developers will use. The second issue relates to quality of mobile application. Even in mobile app market people have problems with quality of app. For example Google’s and Facebook’s mobile app is not always very fast. It’s not even really very powerful compared to a web Application. Another big problem I’m seeing is that the developers often don’t know that a certain feature is a mobile app. Now I think that there is a lot of issues with this mobile app as far as quality of the app is concerned.
Conclusion
I understand that in my area mobile application is important as I want to give a clear message that I believe it’s worth making it one of the important mobile applications. That being said, the only way one can think of to keep that mobile app as mobile on the go is to use HTML5 or JavaScript, where one can create more interesting applications. More importantly, mobile applications help developers as far as they can as they can improve their product.
So how do I know that mobile application is a mobile application? Well, for me, it’s the right one that I made because I think it’s very important to put emphasis on the mobile application and not on the browser and I think that this is the place where there is a lot to focus my attention. By using web browser, you have more chances of getting a decent user experience as it makes it easy for a lot of people to get engaged and to stay interested with your products. And by using javascript. And by using mobile network. Because of this web application and its accessibility.
Thank you very much!!!
There are a lot of advantages of using the mobile business applications such as flexibility and dissemination and also mobility which allows business to conduct from anywhere and any point of time. Mobile business applications also helped organization to improve operational efficiency and flexibility. It is difficult to measure the direct impact of the mobile business applications but the stats shows that there have been improvements in the various kind of organization using mobile business applications.
There are a lot of factors which contribute to the growth of mobile business applications such as the mobile devices which supports the use of internets and also the personal digital assistants