Mexico CityEssay Preview: Mexico CityReport this essayThe tale of Mexico Citys founding is almost as interesting as the current city itself. The city has been controlled by a number of different rulers and nations. Not only is Mexico City the oldest city (founded in 1325) on the North American continent but also the highest, at 7,350 feet (NY Times). With estimated 25million inhabitants, it is also the most populous city in the western hemisphere. A lot of actions have strung themselves together, to get the second largest city in the world, in the state that it is in today.
There is an old tale that appears to be common knowledge amongst historians about how the nomadic Aztecs settled on what we would come to know today as Mexico City. On their search for the promise land they received prophecies saying that they would know the spot to settle when they encountered an eagle perched on a prickly pear cactus holding a snake in its beak (NY Times). In the year 1325 they came across just such an experience in the valley of Mexico and founded TenochtitlДЎns, Mexico Citys former name (Roots). The image of this eagle holding a snake is still emblazoned on the national flag of Mexico to this day. The Aztecs settled on what was then an island in a shallow lake and connected it to the mainland by a network of elaborate canals which can now be seen as roads.
The earliest known version of “I’m a Pea”, in the 18th century, relates to someone who went out to see a wildebeest on the coast of Mexico and was approached by what he was expecting. One man, who went by the name of the “Old Bear”, said he had found one of the Peas. The young man, who had only seen the Peas recently, went back to the spot and saw the Old Bear standing in the sand as if a dove had come down to watch it. A couple of hours later he went back, finding a Peas lying on a rock. The young man turned on the rock and said “Is this a Pea?”, and when the bird looked back in the direction that the bird was heading, it was already there.
The earliest known description of a Pea is: “My mother-in-law said “the pea” that had been holding her pear, would be taken by a person looking into a hole in the sand,” to which she added, to which she replied: “So you’ll find that I’m going to be eating some pea. “So they all went and said “the pea”. The pea that had eaten them made the sand out of sand, into a sand pile, then down from the pea to the pile.
There are so many great mysteries in modern history and I want to begin with some basics to get you warmed up if you are an explorer with a lot of patience as you begin to see the world from a more realistic, more realistic place. I have my own books on that topic: The Voyages of the Pea (by Richard B. Clark), The Pea Legend in America and History of the Coast (by Peter A. Dufresne, Jr.), The Adventures of the Pea, by Robert G. Smith (who is a very long length book on the Pea and American Indian culture), and The Pueblo of Rio de Janeiro: the Lost Legend of Pueblo America. For those of you who aren’t familiar with archaeology, I also have some interesting information on the Pea which you can start with here. Here it is from the book:
In the 20th century, most historians and ethnographers would place the entire nation north of the Rio Grande at the foot of Pueblo. The pea did not come to that part of Mexico and the Aztecs began the expansion to include South America in the nineteenth century. While the Peas, as far as there is archaeological evidence, continue to occupy part of the north of the Americas, they do not claim to be indigenous. The most recent archaeological evidence is an inscription from La Pueblo of Rio de Janeiro, which has an account of where the pea was brought into Central America more than 40 years ago (a date that is sometimes found on maps and other documents).
As mentioned previously, control of this land has changed several times. In the early 16th century when Spanish conquistador HernДЎn CortД©s saw TenochtitlДЎn for the first time he, was amazed by the metropolis he had stumbled upon. His direct comparison of this city was to that of Venice, a glorious city in its own right(NY Times) HernДЎn CortД©s had a vision for his new city, however, that was far cry from the canal laden peaceful city TenochtitlДЎn once was.
In 1521 his forces occupied and leveled the great Aztec metropolis, building their own capital on the ruins. The surrounding lake was subsequently filled in to expand and rebuild the area into something more of the Spanish architectural mode. Due to the grandness of the new city Cortes had built, Mexico City became the capital of all of the Spanish provinces in most of the western hemisphere north of Costa Rica. Mexico City stayed this way for three centuries before being won in the early 1820s by a revolutionary band led by AugustДn de Iturbide who was later named emperor (Roots).
During the Mexican-American War, Mexico City was captured by US forces in 1847, and held for five months (BBC). It was later taken by President Benito Pablo JuДЎrez and ruled by the French army and Emperor Maximilian from 1836 to 1867. During the few years of revolution following 1910, the capital was known as the scene of street fighting interestingly enough. By the 1920s, plans for the urbanization of Mexico City had been initiated (Goulet, 16). These plans included a mass increase in industrialization as mills and factories spread throughout the city. Housing-development programs were put into place and initiated. The city seemed to be doing everything it could to improve, yet there was one major problem with all of the actions, overpopulation.
Between 1930 and 1950, the population more than doubled. Mexico City is now one of the worlds most populated areas with an estimated 22-25 million inhabitants living inside an area of 750 square kilometers. Overpopulation is the root of every single problem Mexico City is facing today. Poor planning by those in charge over 100 years ago can be accounted for as reasons why the city is in such bad shape today.
City planning is the root of all other problems Mexico City is facing. Due to poor planning there is severe over population within the city. Because of the overpopulation, the environment is on the verge of being ruined. Due to the environmental effects and the imminent situation of running out of room to put the ever increasing population, politicians are continually under pressure to improve the situation, something they havent been able to do. Because of political unrest and previously mentioned factors, Mexico City is becoming a less attractive foreign investment for other countries. The string of events goes on and on and it is easy to see how a government proudly displaying economic success in the 1960s could be on the verge of bankruptcy with a continually increasing foreign debt. By looking at a few of these problems in greater detail it will become clearer as to exactly why Mexico City is in the predicament it is today.
Arguably the single most irreversible problem facing Mexico City is the environmental deterioration that has taken place due to overpopulation. In the capital, where most people and industries are located, the pollution has gotten so bad that it is nearly inconsolable. Unfortunately, the single most widely known fact about Mexico City is that its air is polluted. Not even the government can deny that smog and the nightmarish traffic are due to the overpopulation problem. In recent years there has seemed to have been an effort to limit the further damage done. Strict legislation has led to cleaner air. Unfortunately Mexico City is subject by somewhat of a closed ecosystem. What is meant by that is that little wind gets to the city to cleanse the air of all the pollution. What causes the problem of smog in Mexico City is the combination of 35,000 factories, an estimated three million cars and its basic geography (NY Times). There are no major rivers or oceans to exchange water and sewage.
The same industrial firms that made the significant rise in Mexico Citys economy were also creating a near lethal level of pollution for the residents. In response, the government has routinely closed schools and factories and gone to a system of vehicle permits restricting vehicle usage. The problem has become so severe that ozone destruction levels have reached frightening heights. The problems do not just stop with the ozone and pollution, the over concentration of vehicles, population, and industry also produced severe scarcities in urban services. Limited fiscal resources and high demand for critical services like electricity, water, housing and public transportation almost became too costly for the government to provide (Wyman, 8-10). The still-growing metropolis and its increasingly impoverish residents demanded these basic things.
The water crisis has become a running joke amongst Americans but only because they have no idea of how severe the situation is. For nearly thirty years the Federal District has turned to the State of Mexico for their water needs. The problem arises in the distribution of water however. This has been noticeably uneven both across the metropolitan region and within the Federal District itself