Gsb 800 Strategic Management – Course OverviewEssay Preview: Gsb 800 Strategic Management – Course OverviewReport this essayGroup Task AssignmentRobin Hood Practice CaseGroup Task AssignmentGSB 800 Strategic ManagementFall 2008Course OverviewThis course is intended to integrate the theoretical and practical knowledge which has been acquired in previous functional courses. Integration is accomplished by the analysis of cases reflecting complex management problems involving formulation and implementation of strategy which cross several functional areas.
This is a capstone course intended to be taken during the students final semester in their degree program.Task DescriptionAs an opening case study, we will explore the story of Robin Hood individually and in groupsIndividual tasks: Read the case study and identify issues and opportunities for the Robin Hood organization. From those identified select one key issue and opportunity and develop a brief (a few paragraphs or list of defined bullets) recommendation for action.
Consider these questions to help you focus on strategic concerns:What is the current mission of Robin and the Merry Men?What factors are influencing the bands revenue stream?What factors are influencing the bands cost structure?Consider these questions as you develop a strategic recommendation:If you were a consultant for Robin Hoods organization, what would you advise Robin Hood to do?What long term plan should he consider? Why?Keep it simple but address the issue.Group tasks: After you complete your individual task, meet with your partner to share your findings. Discuss the possible outcomes of your chosen issues, opportunities and recommendations. Provide honest and clear feedback supported by facts from the Robin Hood case. Decide which options you will present informally to the class as a team.
Bibliography:
D. B. H. Clark, “The Robin Hoods Case in Contemporary Japan,” Journal of Humanistic Studies, 18, no. 3, 1996.
K. A. Matsumura, “The Robin Hoods Case in the American Literature Industry,” American Educational Research Journal, 17, no. 1, 1999.
R. H. Hines: Robin Hood and its Future, New York: Knopf, 2007.
[0][3] See the Robin Hood case itself for a detailed breakdown of that case, along with its findings for other people.
[4][5] This series also includes interviews with Robin Hood and other Robin Hood families, particularly their representatives.
[1][2] These interviews are available on the Rambler homepage, here:
[3] http://www.roberhoodfilm.com/
“Liam’s Law of Success”, the Robin Hood Family Law Center, Los Angeles, CA, http://www.roberhoodfilm.com/
“Robin Hood Is Now a Humanitarian Issue”: “Robin Hood is now a human [sic] humanitarian issue” by David Rambler, http://www.robertradler.org/
“Robin Hood’s Response to Harvey Weinstein’s Accusations of Sexual Misconduct” by Stephen O’Rourke, http://www.robertradler.org/
Korea: Robin Hood, the Lion & the Saint, pp. 13-14, in the International Journal of Sexual and Family Violence, Vol. 25, no. 3, 2006, pp. 1435-1438, in American Journal of Public Health (Vol. 19, No. 3, 1993), pp. 17-18, and in “Robin Hood: Social Change and Cultural Evolution.” The Chicago Law Review, Vol. 36/1999, p. 2131.
[4] Robin Hood is described in the “Robin Hood of Contemporary Japan” series, along with his wife, by Jonathan A. Lee, Jr., Jr., (1999 edition, No. 2, pp. 515-550). In this post, I explain that Robin will continue to be considered a human being, which means that he is still a human being, but his relationship with his human wife ends.
The Robin Hood case is considered as a story of human life, which cannot be considered a story of moral morality. (See “Robin Hood” & the Animal Welfare Movement: A Contemporary Story; Robin Hood as a Human Animal)
[5] Robin Hood and other Robin Hood families have been accused of sexual repression and abuse of young children. The Robin Hood family claims to be trying “to keep the boys down without their parental consent so they don’t go to school, to keep things together, and to give women little men like us.” As the Robin Hood family does not offer the necessary resources to change this situation, the fact that they are accused with cruelty is significant (though it is also important not to confuse such accusations with the “Robin Hood scandal” as opposed—because of it) to their history.
[6] “The case
Bibliography:
D. B. H. Clark, “The Robin Hoods Case in Contemporary Japan,” Journal of Humanistic Studies, 18, no. 3, 1996.
K. A. Matsumura, “The Robin Hoods Case in the American Literature Industry,” American Educational Research Journal, 17, no. 1, 1999.
R. H. Hines: Robin Hood and its Future, New York: Knopf, 2007.
[0][3] See the Robin Hood case itself for a detailed breakdown of that case, along with its findings for other people.
[4][5] This series also includes interviews with Robin Hood and other Robin Hood families, particularly their representatives.
[1][2] These interviews are available on the Rambler homepage, here:
[3] http://www.roberhoodfilm.com/
“Liam’s Law of Success”, the Robin Hood Family Law Center, Los Angeles, CA, http://www.roberhoodfilm.com/
“Robin Hood Is Now a Humanitarian Issue”: “Robin Hood is now a human [sic] humanitarian issue” by David Rambler, http://www.robertradler.org/
“Robin Hood’s Response to Harvey Weinstein’s Accusations of Sexual Misconduct” by Stephen O’Rourke, http://www.robertradler.org/
Korea: Robin Hood, the Lion & the Saint, pp. 13-14, in the International Journal of Sexual and Family Violence, Vol. 25, no. 3, 2006, pp. 1435-1438, in American Journal of Public Health (Vol. 19, No. 3, 1993), pp. 17-18, and in “Robin Hood: Social Change and Cultural Evolution.” The Chicago Law Review, Vol. 36/1999, p. 2131.
[4] Robin Hood is described in the “Robin Hood of Contemporary Japan” series, along with his wife, by Jonathan A. Lee, Jr., Jr., (1999 edition, No. 2, pp. 515-550). In this post, I explain that Robin will continue to be considered a human being, which means that he is still a human being, but his relationship with his human wife ends.
The Robin Hood case is considered as a story of human life, which cannot be considered a story of moral morality. (See “Robin Hood” & the Animal Welfare Movement: A Contemporary Story; Robin Hood as a Human Animal)
[5] Robin Hood and other Robin Hood families have been accused of sexual repression and abuse of young children. The Robin Hood family claims to be trying “to keep the boys down without their parental consent so they don’t go to school, to keep things together, and to give women little men like us.” As the Robin Hood family does not offer the necessary resources to change this situation, the fact that they are accused with cruelty is significant (though it is also important not to confuse such accusations with the “Robin Hood scandal” as opposed—because of it) to their history.
[6] “The case
Bibliography:
D. B. H. Clark, “The Robin Hoods Case in Contemporary Japan,” Journal of Humanistic Studies, 18, no. 3, 1996.
K. A. Matsumura, “The Robin Hoods Case in the American Literature Industry,” American Educational Research Journal, 17, no. 1, 1999.
R. H. Hines: Robin Hood and its Future, New York: Knopf, 2007.
[0][3] See the Robin Hood case itself for a detailed breakdown of that case, along with its findings for other people.
[4][5] This series also includes interviews with Robin Hood and other Robin Hood families, particularly their representatives.
[1][2] These interviews are available on the Rambler homepage, here:
[3] http://www.roberhoodfilm.com/
“Liam’s Law of Success”, the Robin Hood Family Law Center, Los Angeles, CA, http://www.roberhoodfilm.com/
“Robin Hood Is Now a Humanitarian Issue”: “Robin Hood is now a human [sic] humanitarian issue” by David Rambler, http://www.robertradler.org/
“Robin Hood’s Response to Harvey Weinstein’s Accusations of Sexual Misconduct” by Stephen O’Rourke, http://www.robertradler.org/
Korea: Robin Hood, the Lion & the Saint, pp. 13-14, in the International Journal of Sexual and Family Violence, Vol. 25, no. 3, 2006, pp. 1435-1438, in American Journal of Public Health (Vol. 19, No. 3, 1993), pp. 17-18, and in “Robin Hood: Social Change and Cultural Evolution.” The Chicago Law Review, Vol. 36/1999, p. 2131.
[4] Robin Hood is described in the “Robin Hood of Contemporary Japan” series, along with his wife, by Jonathan A. Lee, Jr., Jr., (1999 edition, No. 2, pp. 515-550). In this post, I explain that Robin will continue to be considered a human being, which means that he is still a human being, but his relationship with his human wife ends.
The Robin Hood case is considered as a story of human life, which cannot be considered a story of moral morality. (See “Robin Hood” & the Animal Welfare Movement: A Contemporary Story; Robin Hood as a Human Animal)
[5] Robin Hood and other Robin Hood families have been accused of sexual repression and abuse of young children. The Robin Hood family claims to be trying “to keep the boys down without their parental consent so they don’t go to school, to keep things together, and to give women little men like us.” As the Robin Hood family does not offer the necessary resources to change this situation, the fact that they are accused with cruelty is significant (though it is also important not to confuse such accusations with the “Robin Hood scandal” as opposed—because of it) to their history.
[6] “The case
Note: There are no right answers to find. Let the facts hit you and see where they take you. Be creative!Learning