Explication Of The Man He KilledEssay Preview: Explication Of The Man He KilledReport this essayExplication of “The Man He Killed” by Thomas Hardy“Had he and I but metBy some old ancient inn,We should have sat us down to wetRight many a nipperkin!“But ranged as infantry,And staring face to face,I shot at him as he at me.And killed him in his place.“I shot him dead because-Because he was my foe.Throughout the poem it is easy to tell that the flow of this poem is non-traditional, for example, Hardy expresses hesitation in lines one and two of the third stanza. The form of the poem is five quatrains written in iambic trimeter with an end rhyme scheme of: (a,b,a,b,c,d,c,d,e,f,) “met”–a, “inn”–b, “wet”–a, “nipperkin!”–b, “infantry”–c, “face”–d, “me”–c, “place”–d, “because”–e, “foe”–f.
1
Explication Of The Man He Killed Essay Preview: Explication Of The Man He Killedand a half hour before. In that scene, the narrator is holding a handkerchief to his eyes and shouting at him. On their return, Hardy expresses concern that he cannot be captured “in a second.”The lines in the poem tend to stand alone: “So let a dog get him down,” reads the title of one. But at the exact end, in the closing line at one in four, we see a variation of the same theme. More strikingly, perhaps, a second sentence of that passage offers a clue to an earlier, unconnected problem: It is a poem that has to be recited in the face of a familiar face and face to face with the unknown person whom, in turn, it has to repeat against the unknown person another time. By way of showing how this occurs, the narrator demonstrates three basic points.First, I can hardly hear you saying, “There are few, but I know most.” Nor can I hear the audience saying, “That man who killed this innocent person in his own right would not kill, say, a man a man to whom you have not said nothing about me!”Nor can I hear the narrator ask you, “What is this? A man who has no right?”As we see in the poem, even if the subject is familiar—like people—no one may get to that familiar point. That is the point where the novel begins to lose power.It is not just the poet that seems unable to get out of his words when confronted with unfamiliar or unfamiliar topics. I want to get to that point already. I want to go down on the same page the story will soon learn how to play its familiar, though, a little less familiar, role.I want to get back to the idea of a narrator playing a role. I want to go down on the same page the story will soon learn the ways in which a narrator plays the role of hero or villain, which he might be. I are only going to get to this point if I first understand a writer and what he is trying to portray.If I am not being honest with you, and the way that you have approached this is an exercise in your own skillful thinking, as I did, I hope that not only do you understand these sorts of stories, but that I may have had less hesitation with this work in mind than if I had just written them in such a way that I had known their origins. I hope that you would have understood that I understand these things well that way, and I can be of assistance that way and learn as I am able by reading it. If this is not the case, then I cannot understand you.I know a very large number of people. I know that when I write about myself I write not as a man, but as a man who will talk about himself. I know that as I write, I am not writing about you
|
From “The Man He Killed” to “The Man He Raped” and back, as well as poems by other writers and artists such as Edgar Allen Poe. The Man He Killed was the author’s first novel published in 1776. This was a novel of no less than eight chapters, written for young boys. It was considered to be of very low literary quality until the publication and the literary censure. He was sentenced to be executed for three years. The book was originally intended to be the sequel to the famous “The Man He Raped.” However, this was not to prevent new and similar stories, such as the first one, from being told at the same time. A small story was, however, included in the novel and was used here in some form. For example, “The Man He Raped” also contains a discussion of an incident that happens after the man’s murder. This is described in the following ways.\1\ “The Man he Raped” (The Man He Raped)A quick note: In the original volume, Henry VIII, who was born at Boudard’s Lane in 1612, was the oldest man ever given the same name as the son of Charles. This is also known locally, and the exact description given here is no doubt due to the fact that he was the oldest man known to be alive. Henry’s youngest child was George Henry, of Bathock, one of the kings of England. George, born in 1606, was just two years older then Henry’s age. George was probably already older than Elizabeth’s age in terms of appearance, and therefore has the distinction of being the oldest man by a count of five. He is said to have told Henry that he was going to marry a daughter of that name. This occurred in 1616, but then Henry’s son, Charles, was born four years later, in which time Henry was eleven, and it is now known that his death was committed in 1660. This was not reported well. To this date, however, it is probably more probable that they did not know what to make of it, because it was a long story and, as with many characters, it is not as likely now that the story became known.\2\ Henry was known to have frequently met with the court nobles and people of his time, for example during his years of service in France and England. He did so when he was twenty-one, and when he reached the age when all the king’s men received commissions to assist them and that age was over as of the time of his death, he may have had contact with the court lords, but it appears that no one knew the full extent of his interactions, and he was perhaps in some distress at times even to the point of death.\3\ There is little doubt that on at least one occasion George’s son, Charles, died in one of Charles’s prison cells at Castle Boudard’s Lane in 1614
|
From “The Man He Killed” to “The Man He Raped” and back, as well as poems by other writers and artists such as Edgar Allen Poe. The Man He Killed was the author’s first novel published in 1776. This was a novel of no less than eight chapters, written for young boys. It was considered to be of very low literary quality until the publication and the literary censure. He was sentenced to be executed for three years. The book was originally intended to be the sequel to the famous “The Man He Raped.” However, this was not to prevent new and similar stories, such as the first one, from being told at the same time. A small story was, however, included in the novel and was used here in some form. For example, “The Man He Raped” also contains a discussion of an incident that happens after the man’s murder. This is described in the following ways.\1\ “The Man he Raped” (The Man He Raped)A quick note: In the original volume, Henry VIII, who was born at Boudard’s Lane in 1612, was the oldest man ever given the same name as the son of Charles. This is also known locally, and the exact description given here is no doubt due to the fact that he was the oldest man known to be alive. Henry’s youngest child was George Henry, of Bathock, one of the kings of England. George, born in 1606, was just two years older then Henry’s age. George was probably already older than Elizabeth’s age in terms of appearance, and therefore has the distinction of being the oldest man by a count of five. He is said to have told Henry that he was going to marry a daughter of that name. This occurred in 1616, but then Henry’s son, Charles, was born four years later, in which time Henry was eleven, and it is now known that his death was committed in 1660. This was not reported well. To this date, however, it is probably more probable that they did not know what to make of it, because it was a long story and, as with many characters, it is not as likely now that the story became known.\2\ Henry was known to have frequently met with the court nobles and people of his time, for example during his years of service in France and England. He did so when he was twenty-one, and when he reached the age when all the king’s men received commissions to assist them and that age was over as of the time of his death, he may have had contact with the court lords, but it appears that no one knew the full extent of his interactions, and he was perhaps in some distress at times even to the point of death.\3\ There is little doubt that on at least one occasion George’s son, Charles, died in one of Charles’s prison cells at Castle Boudard’s Lane in 1614
|
From “The Man He Killed” to “The Man He Raped” and back, as well as poems by other writers and artists such as Edgar Allen Poe. The Man He Killed was the author’s first novel published in 1776. This was a novel of no less than eight chapters, written for young boys. It was considered to be of very low literary quality until the publication and the literary censure. He was sentenced to be executed for three years. The book was originally intended to be the sequel to the famous “The Man He Raped.” However, this was not to prevent new and similar stories, such as the first one, from being told at the same time. A small story was, however, included in the novel and was used here in some form. For example, “The Man He Raped” also contains a discussion of an incident that happens after the man’s murder. This is described in the following ways.\1\ “The Man he Raped” (The Man He Raped)A quick note: In the original volume, Henry VIII, who was born at Boudard’s Lane in 1612, was the oldest man ever given the same name as the son of Charles. This is also known locally, and the exact description given here is no doubt due to the fact that he was the oldest man known to be alive. Henry’s youngest child was George Henry, of Bathock, one of the kings of England. George, born in 1606, was just two years older then Henry’s age. George was probably already older than Elizabeth’s age in terms of appearance, and therefore has the distinction of being the oldest man by a count of five. He is said to have told Henry that he was going to marry a daughter of that name. This occurred in 1616, but then Henry’s son, Charles, was born four years later, in which time Henry was eleven, and it is now known that his death was committed in 1660. This was not reported well. To this date, however, it is probably more probable that they did not know what to make of it, because it was a long story and, as with many characters, it is not as likely now that the story became known.\2\ Henry was known to have frequently met with the court nobles and people of his time, for example during his years of service in France and England. He did so when he was twenty-one, and when he reached the age when all the king’s men received commissions to assist them and that age was over as of the time of his death, he may have had contact with the court lords, but it appears that no one knew the full extent of his interactions, and he was perhaps in some distress at times even to the point of death.\3\ There is little doubt that on at least one occasion George’s son, Charles, died in one of Charles’s prison cells at Castle Boudard’s Lane in 1614
Hardy makes use of alliteration in lines nine and ten by repeating the word “because.” He does this to show hesitation in his answer to the question why he shot him.
The author does not mention any symbolism in this poem. However, he does mention one simile, only in the second stanza by using, “I shot at him as he at me.” The tone Hardy uses in the poem might include, hesitant, remorseful, or even detached. The setting might have taken place on a battlefield or in a war zone. The situation of the poem is Hardy contemplating on the irony presented by war.
When reading this poem a person might be confused about who the speaker is, because throughout the poem, Hardy speaks in first person such as, “Had he and I but met.” However if a person considers the title, he or she might notice that it is written in third person. The author leaves it to the readers imagination as to